The best Practical Law Guides for Real Estate books: Reddit reviews

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

We're rich, we have a lot of land, and we had mass car ownership first. Cultural preferences like what Sonia Hirt calls "spatial individualism" also likely play a role.

> por que quando os primeiros colonos chegavam em algum lugar técnicamente não existia estado apenas colonos no local [...] Então técnicamente era sim uma terra sei lei até um certo período da história

E vc presume que só pq n tem estado n tem lei? Não é uma opinião minha, é um fato

Lê esse livro aq sobre o assunto

> I also don't recognize the authority of the contract that I signed by the owner of the property. > > now what?

Now no one will enter into a contract with you. You'll be ostracized to varying degrees. You'll be living in a van down by the river.

There are examples of anarchist societies in Iceland and Ireland (~1,000 year).

A more recent example is the US west frontier in the 1800s.

[The Not So Wild, Wild West]9https://www.amazon.com/Not-So-Wild-West-Economics/dp/0804748543)

Additionally, if you continue to treat others in that way you'll eventually do so to someone who will accept the cost to their community reputation and they'll use violence against you.

Your post history makes no sense. You post offering advice with links but seem like you are a first time buyer.

Weird.

Anyways. Before going any further, read https://www.amazon.com/dp/1413327001/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_fabc_7RGGVK0N1TQPCRNN0F76

There have been approximations to AnCapistan though. Such as The American Old West, and Saga period Iceland.

Not too likely. This well-researched book addresses your question in detail:

https://www.amazon.com/Not-So-Wild-West-Economics/dp/0804748543

If you don't want to drop the coin for it at least read the description to be exposed to a different perspective than is often parroted in mainstream culture (as visible on this thread).

Also, you can find reviews of the book and other content by the authors on the subject via your favorite search engine.

I work in a large Bronx landlord's office as a paralegal. Your aunt may find this book useful, which one of the attorneys lent to me when I switched into this role: https://www.amazon.com/Landlords-Legal-Guide-Survival-Guides/dp/1572485914

It's written in plain language and will give your aunt a better idea of her obligations as a landlord in NY (state and city).

So I recently read this book https://www.amazon.com/Not-So-Wild-West-Economics/dp/0804748543

Which provides a pretty good case study of anarchism in practice. People moved out west in the United States before governments and despite Hollywood portrayals of the West as a lawless place, people were able to create a number of informal institutions that keep the peace and allowed people to thrive and flourish.

Not legal advice, not legal advice, not legal advice but I suspect you could write a Notice to Cure. It's basically a heads up to the tenant that they're violating a term of their lease and that more serious consequences can arise from their continuing to do so. It has to be delivered in a certain way and you need to keep records. The escalation would be to a Notice to Terminate, and then a holdover eviction proceeding. However an NTC often scares tenants into compliance before rising to that level.

In our office, we do Notices to Cure when tenants are smoking in their apartments, accessing the roof without permission or, for stabilized tenants, refusing to sign their lease renewal. However, you should contact a landlord-tenant attorney to ensure that your lease clause is legal and enforceable and to assess what your best course of action is.

This is not a replacement for an attorney but this is a very helpful book for examples of language to use in your notices and to better apprise yourself of New York property management best practices: https://www.amazon.com/Landlords-Legal-Guide-Survival-Guides/dp/1572485914/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&qid=1517001324&sr=8-11&keywords=new+york+landlord+tenant

> property as a de iure institution requires the prior existence of a State

There's a logical contradiction there. In order for the state to receive any funding (to perform it's actions at a state) it must confiscate people's production. But before people can produce there must first be private property and trade. Thus private property must precede the creation of the state.

Secondly there is lots of evidence of private property without the state. I just finished reading The Not So Wild Wild West which meticulously documents how settlers, who moved West long before governments, defined, protected, and enforced their property rights without the help of the state.

This is the review that I wrote:

> Certainly among the political mainstream but even among certain groups of libertarians there is a belief that government is necessary to define and enforce property rights. It is thought that property rights must be imposed by an outside force and cannot evolve endogenously. The Not So Wild, Wild West demonstrates conclusively time and again that in areas of the Western Frontier that were settled before governments arrived property rights did evolve naturally with the help of institutional entrepreneurs who defined and protected such rights.

> Not only did a vibrant, peaceful, and cooperative social order develop absent formal government, but in almost all cases where the government attempted to impose order, such as with the Homestead Act, it disrupted the natural social order and left settlers worse off than if it had simply done nothing.

> The Western Frontier offers up a case study in practical anarchism and Anderson and Hill have done an excellent job of documenting the achievements of institutional entrepreneurs and debunking the Hollywood caricature of the West as a wild, lawless place.

I found the Nolo guide to buying your first home to be extremely helpful all in one resource.

Nolo's Essential Guide to Buying Your First Home (Nolo's Essential Guidel to Buying Your First House) https://www.amazon.com/dp/1413321186/ref=cm_sw_r_awd_yy80wbZ66CC7V

>Don't know of any specific. They arbitrated disputes in land clubs, Cattlemen's associations, mining camps and wagon trains.

The not so wild wild west.

Source? Maybe the population of downtown is increasing, but it is rather sparse compared to the downtown of most every major American city.

Downtown KC and neighborhoods around Troost and Paseo are a classic example of white flight. I cite this interesting book on the subject. There are many books of various complexity that discuss the issue.

You can not look at things like that in a vacume. The rules of the game very much depend on local situation. If you want to see how this can work, the american west has many good examples. The devopment of mining right for example were very complicated and specific to that situation. The cattle farmers handle there property rights in a diffrent way.

There is not one way of doing everything, the hole point of anarcho capitalism is that you allow a broad range of possible solution and people wo can come up with workable solutions.

Check out the book: The Not So Wild, Wild West: Property Rights on the Frontier (http://www.amazon.com/Not-So-Wild-West-Economics/dp/0804748543/ref=sr_1_1)

I was a first time home buyer last year. I found this book to be very helpful:

Nolo's Essential Guide to Buying Your First Home https://www.amazon.com/dp/1413317626/ref=cm_sw_r_awd_JOz0ub1HDQA1M

It walks you through the whole process.

Yes, I think most libertarians and AnCaps are people who would never consider initiating violence against others, so we naturally resent having violence initiated against us by a monopoly who steals 40% of our money (total cost of government vs. GDP). We police ourselves, and support free trade with other humans in other geographic areas, which naturally prevents wars and minimizes the need for costly militaries and police, while letting each individual pay for as much defense weaponry as they want. However, the wild wild west was really the Not so Wild West

The Complete Guide to Zoning, <em>Dwight Merriam</em>

The author doesn't go into quite as much detail as he should, but so far it seems to good for understanding the overall purpose of zoning laws and how to think about navigating them.

It also pretty entertaining.