The best
Radical Political Thought books:
Reddit reviews
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
The best of Radical Political Thought books by number of unique Reddit comments:
![What Is to Be Done? [Burning Questions of Our Movement]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41YQBPYHt3L._SL500_.jpg)
Top Reddit reviews mentioning Radical Political Thought books:
He's the guy that wrote This (warning: amazon link, open in private browsing so it doesn't effect recommendations) book about how democrats are the real nazis. So you know this guy is grounded in reality.
About how violent Antifa is...kinda ironic
​
https://www.amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
It's the article Why Women Had Better Sex Under Socialism by Kristen R. Ghodsee, which explains the reasons why women had better sex under socialism. She also wrote a book on this subject.
They have chapters, training materials, legal teams, you are literally trying to gaslight people with this nonsense.
Andy Ngo's book breaks all of it down.
https://www.amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
For anyone who wants to read actual proof against what this asshole is talking about.
In the book In Defense of Looting, which is really a historical account of black civil uprisings, the author suggests that we shouldn't view the Civil War as being an abolitionist movement at all. The conflict was, afterall, really spurred on by the role of slavery in new states, and Lincoln had no plans for abolition. The north was centered around bourgeois controlled industry, whereas the south was run more like royalty and aristocracy. And so the Civil War was therefore about the economic control of these two classes and the eventual overthrow of American aristocracy. The author argues that abolition only became a major component due to the slaves stealing themselves in mass, an act which was appropriated by the Union; abolition was forced on the Union through the actions of black people and not because of some high moral qualities of the Union.
Actual source: How to Talk to Your Cat About Gun Safety: And Abstinence, Drugs, Satanism, and Other Dangers That Threaten Their Nine Lives https://www.amazon.com/dp/045149492X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_ee0XDb7M2H58A
> He seems to have a vested interest in assuming Nazis are left-wing, no matter what the actual historiography has to say on the matter, which is causing him to argue in bad faith.
I'm going to guess the poster read/heard something about the latest historical perversion from vaunted intellect-for-hire and convicted felon Dinesh D'Souza. Just another useful idiot who doesn't know how to sort fact from propaganda.
Ahhh, I’m really sorry to hear this. Unfortunately it’s quite common for cats and owners to have differing political views. Fortunately, there is plenty of literature which can really help you both in learning to live together harmoniously. Firstly, you need to consider whether or not there is a possibility of your car bringing firearms in to the house, should your conservative cat follow party lines. I found this book, how to speak to your cat about gun safety very useful for triggering (no pun intended) a meaningful discussion.
Best of luck!
> I think Amazon has as much right not to distribute a book with 3-D printed gun schematics as it does to not distribute a book with instructions for how to make a bomb in your garage.
> I'm watching the events around the Alex Jones deplatforming with some concern for where it's going. I understand that people further to the right than me have every right to be more worried than I am.
Ok, thanks. That's really all I'd have the right to ask for.
I am against all bans on information. Yes, I am pro-free speech. And you can buy books on Amazon right now that have bomb making tutorials.
You cant but help to love Bill Cooper.... and how he destroyed Star Trek for me...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GChemEEDRNM&index=1&list=PL5llvwa-5byTu0wrp9AU_SuC6hK4yKr66
If you read the reviews on his book on amazon, people are woke
You're going to need to buy this book if your cat keeps trying to mess with your guns.
​
https://www.amazon.com/How-Talk-Your-About-Safety/dp/045149492X
We're not in the end times; the Millennial generation is simply at the same age the Boomers were in the 1970's. The Boomers were horribly destructive at that age, and the Millenials are simply repeating the behavior of their parents. Eventually, people will get hate-fatigue and it will be Morning in America again.
Wait, you accuse the left of calling everyone they don't like Nazis? Seriously? Conservative call liberals Nazis way more often. The biggest conservative movie last year was all about how the Nazis were left wing. It was written by Dinesh D'Souza and entitled "The Big Lie". If you're such a smarty pants truth teller, why didn't you know about this movie that tens of millions of conservatives watched? Why didn't you know about Dinesh and all the times Fox News has said the Nazis were liberals? Fox News was even going to recently run a special saying the Nazis were left wing. Because, you know, Hitler hated the white privilege and patriarchy.
​
>Ainda me tens é de dizer onde é que é socialmente aceite ser ladrão
(retirei a raça desta frase de propósito)
A mesma fossa académica que produziu Franz Fanon, produziu recentemente este livro:
https://www.amazon.com/Defense-Looting-Riotous-History-Uncivil/dp/1645036693
É uma tese académica que defende a pilhagem como argumento político.
De resto, imagens de pilhagens não têm faltado um pouco por todo o mundo.
​
Estas coisas começam sempre como ideias, experiências...
Depois são interpretadas, de forma cada vez mais literal.
Depois cristalizam-se em ações.
E quando são ecoadas para lá da memória, são aceites.
I suppose Antifa should boycott Amazon next.
Side note: I didn’t even know Andy Ngo had a book, but now I do!
I've not read it myself. I hear it is about Andy following America's Antifa over the years, specifically Portland's chapter.
Those followup questions feel like they deserve more depth than I can go into. I know Ayers' history from looking him up during the 2008 campaign culture wars. The usual recommendation is Days of Rage, which hasn't actually made it's way to the top of my To Be Read list yet.
Dude, your whole argument comes from this documentary that was on Fox News.
Dinesh D'Souza is the one who started all these bullshit lies about the Nazis being left wing.
O livro: https://www.amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
No dia deste "protesto" a livraria fechou as portas e o livro foi retirado das prateleiras e só será vendido online.
O "protestantes" reclamam que isso não é suficiente e prometem continuar a impedir a livraria de funcionar normalmente.
Well, I guess I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the government then...
​
Amazon still sells the anarchist cookbook as well.
​
> i don't think it's an unpopular opinion that rioting and looting is bad.
...really, I wouldn't get that impression at all looking around Reddit these days. Insane ideologues can be found in multiple subs trying to rationalize, justify and even condone the violence. You even have crazed activists now writing books about how looting and destruction is a GOOD THING:
> https://www.amazon.com/Defense-Looting-Riotous-History-Uncivil/dp/1645036693
...and they are fucking being PRAISED by leftist media for such publications!
$10 amazon
How to Talk to Your Cat About Gun Safety: And Abstinence, Drugs, Satanism, and Other Dangers That Threaten Their Nine Lives https://www.amazon.com/dp/045149492X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_VeqJCb806D6DW
Consider this as a secondary support purchase- How to Talk to Your Cat About Gun Safety:
Perhaps you should tell that to others in your quadrant.
https://www.amazon.com/Defense-Looting-Riotous-History-Uncivil/dp/1645036693
You have it backwards. The 1st Amendment protects a fundamental human right of self-expression. If you wish to supress that fundamental human right, you much overcome a VERY large hurdle of extraordinary justification.
Libel is a narrow exception to free expression that, under the extraordinary circumstance that the information is false and is intentionally published with the intent to cause harm, only then can the speech be made unlawful.
So we have here a desire for prior restraint on the publication of true and accurate and already publicly available information on how to conduct perfectly legal activity. How can that possibly be justified?
Despite providing instructions for legal and illegal activity, you can right now go purchase a copy of The Anarchist's Cookbook on Amazon.
How to Talk to Your Cat About Gun Safety: And Abstinence, Drugs, Satanism, and Other Dangers That Threaten Their Nine Lives https://www.amazon.com/dp/045149492X/ref=cm_sw_r_awdo_navT_g_42S512K8ZJK9M57H3MQ4