What is Reddit's opinion of Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20: 2016 Edition?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

The ending of Mark was not added later. You are listening to heathens who aim to disprove the Bible. I actually wore out my first Bible and had pages falling out of it. Mark was most likely the end of a scroll and its like the cover at the back fell off.

James Snapp on Defending Mark 16:9–20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nrte4885ldg

A Case for the Longer Ending of Mark

https://textandcanon.org/a-case-for-the-longer-ending-of-mark/

Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20: 2016 Edition

https://www.amazon.com/Authentic-Case-Mark-9-20-2016-ebook/dp/B01EU1OR9O

Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20 by guest contributor James Snapp, Jr.

https://peterlumpkins.typepad.com/peter\_lumpkins/2012/05/authentic-the-case-for-mark-169-20-by-guest-contributor-james-snapp-jr.html

Last Two Videos on NT Textual Criticism and Askeland on GJW

https://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2021/12/last-two-videos-on-nt-textual-criticism.html

https://www.curtisvillecc.com/AuthSupplx.html

The Authenticity of Mark 16:9-10

https://truediscipleship.com/the-authenticity-of-mark-169-10/

James Snapp on Defending Mark 16:9–20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nrte4885ldg

A Case for the Longer Ending of Mark

https://textandcanon.org/a-case-for-the-longer-ending-of-mark/

Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20: 2016 Edition

https://www.amazon.com/Authentic-Case-Mark-9-20-2016-ebook/dp/B01EU1OR9O

Authentic: The Case for Mark 16:9-20 by guest contributor James Snapp, Jr.

https://peterlumpkins.typepad.com/peter_lumpkins/2012/05/authentic-the-case-for-mark-169-20-by-guest-contributor-james-snapp-jr.html

Last Two Videos on NT Textual Criticism and Askeland on GJW

https://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2021/12/last-two-videos-on-nt-textual-criticism.html

https://www.curtisvillecc.com/AuthSupplx.html

The Authenticity of Mark 16:9-10

https://truediscipleship.com/the-authenticity-of-mark-169-10/