If I may recommend a book to you then.
Try to find The Big Bang by Simon Singh. It's a great and easy to read history of Astronomy and takes you step by step through the proces of how science found out about the big bang.
>Where does biology come from? Where does anything that exists come from?
The big bang, stardust. Read a book. https://www.amazon.com/Big-Bang-Universe-Simon-Singh/dp/0007162219
This ones pretty good and has actual proof of it's writings, unlike the Bible.
>The bible gives plenty of passages
The Bible isn't a reputable source. I can say The Hobbit was a true story, doesn't make it so.
>because of your ego.
Mmmno, I just don't believe in things that have no proof. Sorry you believe anything some crazy guy wrote in a book thousands of years ago lol I hope you don't eat seafood or wear clothes with two types of fabric or else you will go to hell. There's your "kind" god at work lolololol
If you would like to learn more on this topic, I would recommend the book big bang - the origin of the universe by simon singh. It was the book my high school physics teacher had me read and within it is the best explanation of special relativity I have ever come across. Along with the history of our discovery of the big bang as the origin of the universe, which is also a great story.
Basically, because people are stubborn and refuse to let go of their ideas. Sometimes the older, established scientists refused to accept newer models or theories because they believe that their's is the correct one; and sometimes they stop or stifle the progress of younger scientist. It's usually only after the older scientists have retired/died that new paradigms arise.
You should read Simon Singh's The Big Bang: The Origin of the Universe for some historical examples.
The Big Bang by Simon Singh is my absolute go-to for this! Easy to read, general overview of the history of cosmology!
Since Newton, astronomers thought the universe was infinite and static. When Albert Einstein published general relativity in 1915, he also assumed the universe was infinite and static.
Two physicists, Alexander Friedman in 1922 and George Lemaitre in 1927, reported to Einstein that his equations suggested the universe is expanding. Einstein hated this claim and denied it until 1931.
Until the 1920s, most astronomers thought what we now see as the Milky Way was the universe. Astronomers could see nebulae which were puzzling. Immanuel Kant claimed in the 1700s these nebulae were "island universes" outside the Milky Way. In 1920, Harlow Shapely and Heber Curtis held The Great Debate about whether these nebulae were inside or outside the Milky Way.
In 1923, Edwin Hubble proved the Andromeda nebulae was outside the Milky Way. In 1929, Edwin Hubble, looked at galaxies outside the Milky Way, reported they are moving away from us. In 1931, Hubble showed his data to Einstein and Einstein was convinced.
This didn't settle the matter, Fred Hoyle, Hermann Bondi, and Thomas Gold strongly defended the static universe. Fred Hoyle coined the term Big Bang in a radio interview. These three physicists presented persuasive arguments for several decades, splitting the astronomical community.
After 1931, other ideas were proposed and supported by observation. One idea is the explanation of steller nucleosynthesis leading to the observed ratio of primordial elements. Another idea is the observed evolution of galaxies as we look further back in time.
The best support for the Big Bang was the 1965 observation of cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) left over from the Big Bang. From what I have read, this observation ended the debate for most astronomers.
To me, the Big Bang is an explanation of what we have observed thus far. What we have observed thus far is not enough to explain what, if anything, was before the Big Bang, what started the material universe to expand or what, if anything, the universe is expanding into. Our inability to explain what we have not yet observed doesn't disprove what we have observed or our explanation of what we have observed.
Many books explain the history of the idea of The Big Bang. I liked Big Bang Universe by Simon Singh, 2005.
Astronomy isn't only physics. I took an astronomy class in high school. This was my favorite class. We learned about it mostly from a historical perspective. We did some fun exercises as well, like learning how they calculated the distance of stars back then using some math formulas. I personally can't fathom not having an interest in our universe, but I think you should teach it from this historical perspective. If it helps, there's a good book I read - https://www.amazon.com/Big-Bang-Universe-Simon-Singh/dp/0007162219
For the record, I ended up studying biomedical science in school, since I wasn't the best at math, and I knew this field was heavy in math. Still, I enjoy reading about all things space.
I prefer Simon Singh's Big Bang.