What is Reddit's opinion of Bullies: How the Left's Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

His whole gimmick is about how terrible liberals are. He even wrote this book about it. I have no doubt that he has nothing for disdain for people like me.

Ben Shapiro embodies everything I am trying to say in this thread. He has no respect for liberals and he only wants to prove himself right. Conservatives need better representatives for their movement. Even Antonin Scalia, as you mentioned, had at least a modicum of respect for the other side.

But when the conservatives that come to universities are like Ben Shapiro, I am not remotely interested in hearing their ideas.

> Dude, you made non-sequitur and appeals to emotion. Like do you even know what a non-sequitur means? There was no actual argument to avoid.

Ok "dude", I'm not going to "like" waste my time with this "actual" drama. Moving on...

> Your article is riddled with IAT developers that don't believe it is useful for diagnosis and zero in on the one that does.

Yes, thank you for pointing that out. Please refer to my argument and create a counterargument to my argument, which still stands. Moving on...

> There's literally no argument about why political correctness bad.

I was going to give you a hand-written history lesson on what happened with "political correctness" and what it lead to, but it sounds like you're just trolling, so I'll just refer you to this short video. I'll be surprised if you watch it.

> Did that kid make a bomb I wonder?

I've already made it clear that it's just a clock that he bought, disassembled, put in a suitcase, went to school, said "I'm Muslim, look at this clock that I made in a suitcase (where the teachers knew it was a clock)", refused to follow instructions and instigated problems, and then was arrested.

My point is the following: his family members are terrorists, his friends are terrorists, and he himself is a terrorist. The idea of "political correctness" is what allows him to commit these acts of terror.

In the case of Mohamed v. The Blaze Inc, et. al.:

> The “Clock Boy” issue quickly became the forum for a societal debate of critical political issues of critical public interest, including both alleged prejudice against Muslims and the use of claims of prejudice against Muslims to shame and silence critics of Islamic terrorism within the umbrella of what is sometimes labeled by critics as “political correctness.” (See Petition, ¶¶ 28-61)

> In his dealings with the press, the family spokesperson was one Alia Salem, Executive Director for the Dallas-Ft. Worth chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR is a controversial Islamic activist group that was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorist trial.

> As discussed above, Shapiro had no personal knowledge of Plaintiffs, but he had seen photos of the device and believed no reasonable person would take such a device to school during a period of terrorism and school attacks. (Shapiro Aff., ¶ 13, p. 44) He also knew that school officials and the police had reacted to the device as if they believed it to be potentially dangerous. (Shapiro Aff., ¶ 13, p. 44) He knew the family had a connection to CAIR, an organization the federal government had linked to terrorist supporters. (Shapiro Aff., ¶ 12, p. 44) He knew the family had associated with Sudan’s bloody dictator. (Shapiro Aff., ¶ 12, p. 44) Shapiro also understood that a tactic of activists was to manufacture controversies in order to gain media attention, and he knew the family had sought media attention both during this event and previously. (Shapiro Aff., ¶ 12, p. 44) In short, Shapiro knew multiple facts that supported his opinion that this entire controversy was a hoax set up to support the Mohameds’ political narrative, and he knew of no credible facts—the only other evidence being Plaintiffs’ denials, which Shapiro found self-serving and not credible— that led him to any other conclusion.

> E. Plaintiffs Cannot Show That Shapiro’s Statements Were False

> 13 Neil MacFarquharaug, Muslim Groups Oppose a List of ‘Co-Conspirators’, NEW YORK TIMES, August 16, 2007 avail. at. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/16/us/16charity.html, attached hereto as Exhibit L. p. 135 (“The unindicted co-conspirators were named in the case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, which opened July 16. The charity and five of its officers are accused of providing material support for terrorism by...

> February  15,  2015  (DALLAS,  TEXAS)  –  One  of  the  dozen  contenders  in  Sudan’s  presidential elections pledged that he will work with the US administration to lift the decade­long economic sanctions imposed on the country and remove it from the list of states that sponsor terrorism.

> Sudan  is  also  on  the  US  list  of  states  that  sponsor  terrorism  since  1993  even  though  the  two countries have strengthened their counterterrorism cooperation since September 2001 attacks on Washington and New York.

> The Internet is his refuge — and his attacker. He reads every story and long, rambling conspiracy theory about him. Countless blogs and videos have been dedicated to proving Ahmed’s clock was just a RadioShack clock he put in a new box. (It was partially made of RadioShack parts, but the design was all his own, he says.) Others insist that this was all a stunt masterminded by Mohamed to get attention. (“He can’t plan the reaction. And why would he want me to get arrested?” Ahmed says.) Still more have proclaimed that the Mohameds are terrorist sympathizers because they once owned a company called Twin Towers Transportation. (They did own a company by that name, because their offices were housed in a Dallas office building called the Twin Towers.)

The court affirmed that Shapiro's statements could not be proven false, and for since Ahmed the terrorist didn't have a case, the court's decision was that Ahmed had to pay Shapiro a total of $58,189.38.

> Per the affidavits, Shapiro should be awarded $58,189.38, representing the total amount of attorneys’ fees and recoverable costs expended defending this lawsuit. (Exhibits R-S, pp. 162- 171; Schlichter Aff., ¶¶ 2-15, pp. 48-51; Gober Aff., ¶¶12-19, pp. 55-56)

Conclusion: Ahmed cannot, and refuses, to disprove the allegations that he is a terrorist, considering his ties to terrorism.

> Do you know what communism is? socialism?

Yes, and I can write about this for hours, but you didn't read anything I wrote, so I'm not going to reply to this. Go back and read, quote what I wrote, and reply to the quote. I challenge you. If you can't do this, I will assume that you don't have the intelligence to figure out what needs to be done in order to copy-and-paste.

I almost feel bad wasting my time talking to you, since you obviously can't hold a rational argument and you're bigoted. I used to be a democrat, and I used to advocate social justice. I, however, actually have an open mind and collect raw information before making decisions.

It's really ironic how predictable you are.. You just have the same argument over and over again, character assassination followed by character assassination. I've read nearly all of your comments: they're all the same.

Here, a book that lays out why /u/careless is such a tool: Bullies: How the Left's Culture of Fear and Intimidation Silences Americans https://www.amazon.com/dp/1476710007/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_XhK9xbJVZ0CAZ

This sub is only proving his point that the left bullies anyone who opposes them rather than debating their ideas, something he wrote an entire book about. Looks like he was spot on about that.

This sub is only proving his point that the left bullies anyone who opposes them rather than debating their ideas, something he wrote an entire book about. Looks like he was spot on about that.