The US health industry makes 3.2% profit on all capital investment. That is pathetic. If you have $1k to invest somewhere, you can probably just open a regular bank savings account than invest it in pharma companies.
They spend the vast vast majority of their money on meeting regulations.
you are making several assumptions here, and may not even realize it
>because single payer is ultimately the only way to preserve healthcare costs.
Doesn't he have plans to reduce healthcare costs?
Anyway, my stance is healthcare costs are being driven up by two things.
The non-evidence based nutritional guidelines that we have, and it seems the more we follow those guidelines the worse people do in regard to obesity, metabolic disease, and diabetes. Some of these guidelines actually have roots in religion rather than science. And even though we may not consciously follow the guidelines, food manufacturers will want to stay within the guidelines to reach the most customers. So you end up following the guidelines whether you want to or not... As pointed out by Nina Teicholz:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJEHiQKqfZM
The other problem is that the FDA is way more strict then the European counter parts which drives up research costs and the amount of time in which drugs are approved which ends up reflected in the costs of the drugs in the US. And the FDA is way too powerful and in many respects corrupt (they have punished pharmaceuticals in the past who have pointed out practices of bribery, by delaying processing of their drug approval). And not to mention going by the numbers the FDA has incidentally killed lots of terminal ill patients who had a hard time getting access to experimental drugs that would save or extend their lives, since pharma doesn't want to risk delaying approval by the FDA by trying to help them. As Mary Ruwart points out in her book:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0963233610/ref=dbs_a_def_rwt_bibl_vppi_i0