What is Reddit's opinion of Fundamentals of Educational Research, Enhanced Pearson eText with Loose-Leaf Version -- Access Card Package?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

Alright, troll. All you've done is make my job easier.

The way it works in Florida is that textbooks are submitted for review before being approved or denied. The public is invited to review textbooks and assess how they fit in with state standards. These are digital versions of textbooks which can be ordered as print copies later on.

As I said before, digital versions can contain extra content like videos, as I saw that many times in college. Here's a textbook you can get in print that comes with access to an e-text version that states “The Enhanced Pearson eText features embedded video and assessments.” So a screenshot of a page with video means nothing about whether or not it's from a textbook or if it can be a print textbook, as there are e-text versions of print textbooks with added videos, and the textbooks up for review are going to mostly be e-texts anyway.

When textbooks are approved, that means the state will give public funding to purchase those textbooks. Books that aren't approved are not banned for use, schools can still buy and use them, they just need to use at least 50% of public funds given for textbooks on approved textbooks. So nothing was banned.

Also, in the last few weeks many publishers have removed content in their books that disqualified them, allowing them to be approved. This is because after rejection, publishers have time to fix problems and get approved. So it's even fewer textbooks that get rejected than the original 41%.

I did indeed find the book that image was from, here's an article describing the review process and it mentions the book that particular image came from. You may need to view it in incognito mode to bypass the paywall.

https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/education/fl-ne-florida-math-textbooks-examples-20220421-7im4phdjdbfhdiljr6l3lparbi-story.html

As you can see, the offending image came from “Thinking Mathematically” by Savvas Learning Company. From this link you can see that “Thinking Mathematically” was indeed one of the rejected textbooks.

Here is the Florida DoE website where the image is seen:

https://www.fldoe.org/academics/standards/instructional-materials/

And at the bottom of the page you can find information about the public review process I spoke about above, which occurred in January, which matches up with the article quoting the woman who said she was looking through textbooks in January.

So there, no books were banned, rejected books can still be used and can still be approved later on. The DoE takes feedback from the public about which textbooks to approve or deny. And there's the name of the textbook that was rejected for including that content.

Now it's your turn to post a single link showing anything you said is true.