What is Reddit's opinion of Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

I hate how "historians" think they know more about history than my grandparents.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, removeddit.com, archive.is

2. Tyson’s keynote address for the TA... - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, archive.is

3. Laplace, not having God on the brai... - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, archive.is

4. An earlier post - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, removeddit.com, archive.is

5. r/badhistory - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, <u>archive.is*</u>

6. this article by Thony Christie - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, archive.is

7. Isaac Barrow - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, archive.is

8. Neil deGrasse Tyson on Isaac Newton... - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, archive.is

9. https://www.amazon.com/Isaac-Newton... - archive.org:), <u>megalodon.jp*</u>: "could not auto-archive; click to resubmit it!"), archive.is

10. Karol Zyczkowski’s “On the Stabilit... - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, archive.is

11. Lagrange points - archive.org, <u>megalodon.jp*</u>, archive.is

^(I am a bot.) ^([Info](/r/SnapshillBot) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=\/r\/SnapshillBot))

>From {William L. Harper?s book on Isaac Newton](https://www.amazon.com/Isaac-Newtons-Scientific-Method-Cosmology/dp/019957040X)

Just a heads up to fix your formatting.