Do yourself a favor and read up on the theories of Jean-Pierre Houdin regarding the construction of the great pyramid. There are two main documentaries about his theories, one is a National Geographic doc narrated by his friend and his collaborator and another narrated by Houdin himself. I like the one done by Houdin but the NatGeo one is good to. They are both hard to find in their entirety on free video sites. He also has a book
This is important material because it adequately explains many issues with constructing such a huge structure and it helps break it down to an easy to understand project that could be done by ancient Egyptians.
I found the one I like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9C3rob_cTA
All I'm arguing is that the construction of the pyramids does not require 'advanced technology' in advance of what we have today.
The years of scientific research do not point towards such advanced technology. Where is the evidence for your point of view?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You have an extraordinary claim. Where is your evidence?
Notice how once again you do not answer even a single one of my questions? You just attack me instead.
Why can't you answer any of my questions?
Allow me to answer yours, though.
Of course there are plenty of papers about Pyramid construction. Do any of them prove a method beyond a shadow of a doubt. No. But, science doesn't work that way. There is plenty of evidence to show that many traditional techniques were used, and some evidence to show that some unexpectedly sophisticated methods were used.
On the other hand there is ZERO evidence to show that 'advanced technology' in excess of our own was used. Please, provide me with some, if you have it.
For example, here are some 'traditional' papers and evidence about pyramid construction from my bookmarks:
That's just a tiny sample of the material available. There is more than a century's worth of archeology and scientific debate on the subject. Hell, just google it, there's masses of stuff...
Note how the traditional papers are backed up by:
Here are some interesting papers and videos about the geopolymer 'concrete' construction theory, a bit more controversial, but intriguing:
Notice how this theory is backed up with:
Now, what evidence can you provide for advanced technology in advance of our own?
Anything?