Firstly, I need to make a little preliminary remark on "hispanic." Latin Americans that aren't "criollos" (Spaniards born in the Americas) tend to prefer "Latina/o", their respective countries' cognomens (say, Chileno, Argentino, or what have you) but also just as often won't give a shit and will be fine with hispanic. Hell, some are indigenous and can be part of one of literally thousands of different groups all up and down the hemisphere but cannot really be considered "hispanic" at all, and some don't even care for "Latin America" or even the countries that erected around them. In a way I've already begun answering your question because the need to distinguish between those of direct Spanish lineage and those of a mestizo background (mix of indigenous and Spanish) intimates the rich, complex history that distinguishes Latin America and partially explains why resistance to the US is different than in the rest of the world. There are also large Japanese communities in Peru and Brazil, Germans living in massive coffee plantations in Guatemala (as well as hiding out in Argentina), a very strong African presence around the Caribbean, and definitions of the limit of Latin America can include much of the United States, and this varied history explains partly why the differences in relations with the US between Latin America and "the Muslim World."
Now I say this not to diminish the richness of "the Muslim world," the HUGE diversity of ethno-linguistic, economic, religious, sexual and political groups or their countries' equally varied histories. In fact, the little I know of both of these regions is enough to make me realize that I can't really speak of "the Muslim world" as an encompassing whole if I am to speak about anything other than, say, Islam, but even then, Islam as it is practiced in, say Saudi Arabia, will be different than the Islam practiced in Mexico (that's another growing community in Mexico, for instance; Islam, iirc, is the fastest growing religion in the country, and Lebanese-Mexicans are a growing minority).
That's a super complicated history, but I'll condense it thusly: Latin America was established purely for the exploitation of labor, the extraction of raw materials by a medieval power, not a premodern or modern one, and this was accomplished by the establishment of a caste system buttressed by a religious telos that promotes poverty and suffering over conflict and emancipation as a means to attain the kingdom of heaven.
That's not to say Latin Americans don't "attack" the US. Honestly, I don't think the Muslim world "attacks" the US, either, I'm convinced that, being on the peripheries of a global empire making inroads into these regions, they're pushing back against an encroaching hegemon (fancy talk for, resisting what seems to be the inevitable). Latin America, though, being a southern neighbor accustomed to five hundred years of war and exploitation by a stronger power (Spain, France, UK, or US), and a regional character marked by five hundred years of thorough indoctrination toward passivity by the Church, isn't likely to find a common rallying cry that can politicize their grievances and give them a language to articulate their fury. That's not to say there weren't attempts to break out of that. Liberation Theology was a wonderful, wonderful use of Christian teachings to empower the poor, develop independent communities, and rally the disenfranchised against governments more interested in kowtowing to Washington or London. Naturally, the Vatican swiftly stamped it out and ended it, though its influence remains. (here I recommend you look into the EZLN movement in Chiapas, Mex., a subject very near and dear to my heart).
There also have been various military confrontations as well. Various "civil wars" that have taken place in Cuba, Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala, Colombia, Chile, Nicaragua, Haiti and others at various times in their histories were directly against US forces and interests. One good book that goes over not just the conflicts but the economic factors that led to them is Inevitable Revolutions I warn you though, this is some gross shit done by the US and its fascist cronies: torturing women, raping nuns, dead children on stakes in El Salvador...
Along with that, no matter what some bourgie-ass white man from Yale says, I, Rigoberta Menchu is an excellent first-hand account into indigenous life in one of these countries.
For the whole region, though, and for a look at what a Latin American writes, I strongly strongly strongly recommend Open Veins of Latin America. It was written by a journalist from Uruguay who set out to do a history of the region that was for its time, the first to be told from the perspective of Latin Americans themselves and to this day is far more comprehensive in its treatment of the struggles that the region faces as a result of its ongoing colonial legacy.