Nothing I haven't read before or heard at every conference I go to!
This book was quite a good summary of the counter-case. You'll find lots of slander of the authors online, "big-oil shill", "denier" etc. I'd suggest you read the book anyways if you're truly interested. He who knows only his one side of the case knows little of that, as Mill said.
I don't discount that views are motivated by your pocketbook, as Michael's may be since he has oil money funding, but you must also consider that the people who are sourced in your article have a monetary incentive that relies on the catastrophic Climate Change hypothesis being correct. How many people would stand to lose their careers if it were proven false? I know several personally from my professional life!
If you think there's a 100% chance of 5°C by the middle of the century, why did you throw it under the bus?
https://www.amazon.com/Lukewarming-Climate-Science-Changes-Everything/dp/1944424032