What is Reddit's opinion of
Manifesto for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money by Gottfried Feder?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
By popularity on Reddit, this product is:
3 reviews of this product found across Reddit:
Archives for this post:
- Link: 1 (glsen.org): http://archive.fo/cNV5U
- Link: 2 (sports.glsen.org): http://archive.fo/OdgHf
Archives for links in comments:
- By wisty (hbr.org): http://archive.fo/3pfN9
By beerknight (answersingenesis.org): http://archive.fo/Xq5t3
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, Mnemosyne saves! the rest of you take 20 damage ^^^^/r/botsrights ^^^^Contribute ^^^^message ^^^^me ^^^^suggestions ^^^^at ^^^^any ^^^^time ^^^^Opt ^^^^out ^^^^of ^^^^tracking ^^^^by ^^^^messaging ^^^^me ^^^^"Opt ^^^^Out" ^^^^at ^^^^any ^^^^time
> Lol are you high? Poland was about as far from communism as could be.
Are you illiterate? Nobody suggested Poland was communist. Obviously your claim that they were "as far from communism as could be" is retarded, but it isn't relevant. There were communists in Poland trying to drum up a revolution there just as they had done in Russia, and just as they were trying to do across Europe, including in Germany.
>The Germans violated the non-aggression pact they signed with Poland because they wanted their lands. It's well known.
It is also "well known" that you hate women, gays, non-whites and liberals and want to round them all up and kill them because you have posted on this subreddit. Just because something is "well known" doesn't make it true. Germany did want their land back, which is why they had been negotiating with Poland for a solution to the problem for 3 years. Allowing the communists to murder Germans served to force them into action, since they otherwise just kept trying to negotiate peaceful agreements.
>Read something for once. Here's an overview idiot.
You read it. Not a wikipedia summary, the actual case. The judge literally said that evidence was not needed because the holocaust is beyond dispute. Just like every single time the question was supposed to be put before a court.
>Yeah there are millions of testimonials relating to the Holocaust when you look at people who worked in the camps, lived near the camps, were in the camps or were involved in the overall architecture of the Final solution.
No there are not. No historian suggests anything so absurd. None. You can't support this lie at all. At least when you stick to the standard story you can fall back on historians, but when you make up nonsense you are out on your own.
>But hey, despite the fact that every serious academic disagrees with the idea that the holocaust was a fabrication, clearly you know better!
"If I define serious academic as only those who agree with me, then they all agree with me!". Why do you suddenly care about "serious academics" now after telling me they are all wrong because they think there are only hundreds of testimonies and not millions?
>Do yourself a favor, when you feel like denying the crimes of the Nazis, go to your favorite fallacy on this website.
I've read all the holocaust nonsense out there dude, that's why I don't believe in it. When attempts to "debunk" holocaust denial simply ignore the concrete evidence and talk about Anne Frank, it does not restore confidence in the narrative. Anne Frank casts doubt on the holocaust, she does not support it. She was sent to the "extermination camp" at Auschwitz, where she lived for a few months and then was shipped off to a camp which is no longer claimed to be an extermination camp. Where she died of Typhus. And this is the official story. Why on earth would the nazis ship trainloads of jews OUT of an extermination camp to a prison camp where they were not killing jews?
>Read "The Wages of Destruction" by Adam Tooze.
He was not even born then, much less a prominent national socialist. Remember your claim. You need to demonstrate that national socialist doctrine is to plunder other countries.
>Hell read a book
Give me one I haven't read and I will. Now you read a book, like one that actually lays out what national socialism doctrine is: https://www.amazon.ca/Manifesto-Abolition-Enslavement-Interest-Gottfried-ebook/dp/B009Q85R32
>Nazi Germany spent between 5% to 20% of it's GDP on rearmament between 33-39,
And you are now left with providing evidence of this, just like all the other communist propagandists who have made this baseless claim you are repeating. I can say "FDR spent 200% GDP on baby mulching machines so he could make puree of baby soup which was his favorite meal", but without evidence it really doesn't matter.
>Rofl, you call me a commie just after I disparage the Stasi idiot.
"Rofl I am engaging in textbook communist subversive behavior why would you think I am a communist you idiot."
>Also it's very well documented that there were mandatory assemblies and when the furher came to visit, the local gauleiter basically told the population to be there
Yes, your feelings are always "well documented" with documents you can't produce. Funny how that works. Please, explain exactly how this worked. How were millions of people forced to travel from all over the country and camp out in tents for days waiting for a chance to see Hitler. Tell me what order was given to whom and how they managed to force this action. The entire combination of all police and military forces wouldn't provide enough manpower for that. Until the war started, they didn't have many soldiers to go around forcing people to wave at Hitler for no apparent reason. Did these millions of magical "love Hitler" fairies also sneak into Austria in advance to help them vote the right way and plan their parades and celebrations for rejoining Germany?
>You're also arguing approval ratings in a dictatorship, you retard, are you not aware how moronic that sounds?
Approval rating has nothing to do with voting and you know it. There were lots of dictatorships, like our best buddies the USSR! Why was Stalin's approval so low then if dictatorships magically make everyone like the dictator?
>Here is the result of the great policies of Adolf Hitler. What a failure.
And you still want to pretend not to be a communist? "If you try to extricate yourself from global finance and we murder millions of civilians to punish you, that means you were the problem!". That's commie logic alright.
What are you smoking? Quote the national socialist text that says that. Or if you want to cure your pathological ignorance, read a fucking book: https://www.amazon.ca/Manifesto-Abolition-Enslavement-Interest-Gottfried-ebook/dp/B009Q85R32
Popular alternatives to Manifesto for the Abolition...
Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland
Mein Kampf
