> or do I need a better telescope?
Sadly, yes. The StarSense Explorer LT 114 is what is known as a Bird-Jones scope. It uses a cheaply made mirror, and then a corrector lens in the focuser to correct for the aberrations of the cheap mirror. In theory it should work fine, but these things are stamped out of a factory and are poorly manufactured, so their optical quality is about as bad as it gets in amateur astronomy.
Similar Bird-Jones scopes are the Astromaster 114 (same scope as the StarSense Explorer, but on a different mount), and the PowerSeeker 127EQ. Meade offers similar Bird-Jones scopes, and you can find other cheap variations of them on Amazon. They all have incredibly poor optics.
But that's only part of the problem. There are other factors that go into getting clear views of the planets:
This article goes into more detail: https://medium.com/@phpdevster/help-i-cant-see-detail-on-the-planets-ac27ee82800
So what this means that while upgrading your telescope to a parabolic Newtonian reflector is most certainly necessary to get clearer views out of the planets, it doesn't automatically mean you will get them. The above conditions also have to be met.
It can be challenging to see details on the planets and takes some patience.
For a scope, avoid ANY entry-level scope from Meade, Celestron, Orion, and any of the scopes on Amazon.
Stick to the scopes recommended in the pinned buyer's guide: https://www.reddit.com/r/telescopes/comments/i0tzkw/an_absolute_beginners_quickguide_to_choosing_your/
Unfortunately, the pandemic has made them all hard to get AND more expensive. This is a really tough time to buy telescopes.
For the time being, I recommend not worrying about using your scope to view the planets and use your current scope to its greatest advantage:
The scope works just fine as long as you keep the magnification low by sticking to longer focal length eyepieces, and you get out to a dark site.