Item | Current | Lowest | Reviews |
---|---|---|---|
Perfect Software: And Other Illusions about Testi… | - | - | 4.4/5.0 |
^Item Info | Bot Info | Trigger
Item | Current | Lowest | Reviews |
---|---|---|---|
Perfect Software: And Other Illusions about Testi… | - | - | 4.4/5.0 |
^Item Info | Bot Info | Trigger
This is a good community suggesting some solid resources.
Here is a couple more suggestions:
The article seems to focus on whether it's realistic or not. I'd argue that the more important point is whether it's effective or not. While automated testing is a key component of testing, there are some benefits of manual testing that simply can't be replicated by automated testing. Similarly, manual testing can help expose some inherent shortcomings of automated testing.
Gerald Weinberg had a great quote in Perfect Software And Other Illusions About Testing...
> The number one testing tool is not the computer, but the human brain—the brain in conjunction with eyes, ears, and other sense organs. No amount of computing power can compensate for brainless testing, but lots of brainpower can compensate for a missing or unavailable computer.
There are a handful of overarching reasons that attempting to rely 100% on automated testing isn't effective...