Radical Remission is a great book which goes into diet as well as many other ways to counter cancer growth. The author, Dr. Kelly Turner, interviewed tons of people who had seemingly beat the odds and her book attempts to distill what she learned.
Aha - so they have a twitter page. I just found the website for The Radical Remission Project a couple of days ago -
Over 800 cancer stories online as well as stories of people recovering from other conditions. This is all based on Kelly Turner's excellent 2014 book, Radical Remission -
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0062268740/
And she has a newer book (2021), Radical Hope -
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1401965245/
I read the story from the tweet above - wow - she really went through a lot, And I clicked on your search link - man, you have stuff here going back 7 years. Quite a database here. Thanks for keeping this going!
Prevention is the most rational, efficient, and effective approach to cancer.
But when a cancer process is already occurring, the likelihood for thorough recovery (both depth and duration) is directly tied to the comprehensive-ness and intensity of anti-cancer components marshaled and sustained against it. (Interestingly, many/most cancer-prevention components carry through, also, to the cancer-recovery side of the equation. Although, these components are often much more intensified and committed to when being leveraged against an active cancer, than when being only incorporated with prevention in mind -- according to what I've observed. Such components would include diet, nutrition, lifestyle, exercise, stress management, sleep restoration, and many more. When recovery is the goal, people tend to get much more serious and committed to each component, etc.)
This type of approach (wide-ranging, comprehensive, multifaceted, non-toxic, health-promoting, sustaining, and more...) is not studied. But alt-minded thinkers might, like me, think that its omission from investigation is both glaring and indefensible.
I highly recommend that anyone interested in a respected professional's well-researched opinion on how science is completely dropping the ball (with their narrow vision and failure to study thousands of unexpected recoveries based on comprehensive approaches) on best likelihood for cancer recovery read Radical Remission: Surviving Cancer Against All Odds, by Kelly Turner, PhD: http://www.amazon.com/Radical-Remission-Surviving-Cancer-Against/dp/0062268740/
Let me add, also, that when I say that "remedies for cancer" is flawed, I most certainly don't mean that cancer can't be overcome. It's just that seeking its demise via only/merely novel, narrow, cytotoxic, bodily-damaging methods is completely flawed.
Only through methods which comprehensively support the body's own, innate, 'cancer prevention and control' systems will cancer be genuinely "remedied" to the greatest possible extent. Best outcomes in life extension and quality of life will never come from only utilizing "standard of care", conventional approaches. (Though they will continue to ride along on their troubled wave, wildly swinging between lows of ineffectual disappointments and highs of over-hyped, underwhelming "successes" -- all marginal, and paradigm-trapped in 'tumor response' as their measure of benefit. (Learn more by searching "surrogate endpoint"))
NOTE: Everything I've said, above, is also applicable to those who choose to include conventional cancer treatments in their overall plan. I firmly believe that the anti-cancer components I've listed are very likely to 'modulate' the overall outcome -- no matter what the other specifics of anyone's treatment approach literally are. Things like diet, nutrition, exercise, stress management, sleep restoration, etc, will always impact the body, and increase likelihood of the best outcome possible (depth and duration).
EDITS likely -- for about a day, or so....