I find pascal's wager to not be very convincing or reasonable. I address it in depth in my book, but to put it briefly: the big issue is that the wager assumes there are only two possible beliefs: secular atheism, or nicene christianity. Of course, there are more religions than that! It also assumes that we can choose our beliefs, which we cannot.
It's basically really only a way to make nicene christians feel good as a result of their already existing beliefs (thinking the wager is on "their side"). The correct "position" would be to try and satisfy as many afterlife criteria as possible, so that no matter which one you end up at, the result is decent.
Or rather, perhaps just figure out what is actually true, so that we can be certain about our destination.
I'd recommend my own book. Though that's a bit biased of me. So I'll go ahead and point to The Eternal Verities: For Old Souls in Young Bodies being the book that ultimately tipped me from atheism to theism.