This product was mentioned in
with an average of
Of course. This is exactly as described by Vox Day in his book
accuracy ~~has nothing to do with~~ is just one component of effective persuasion. quick rundown:
there are two modes of persuasion, dialectic and rhetoric. dialectic is based on facts, rhetoric on emotions. dialectic is concerned with accuracy, rhetoric with effect.
rhetoric is without any question the more effective mode of persuasion. somebody who disagrees with you on an emotional level isn't going to listen to your well-thought out and proven assertions that a given thing is wrong. they will definitely listen to effective ridicule or humiliation for their wrong beliefs.
the most effective rhetoric, however, is that backed up by facts. the reason why SJWs are reacting the way they are to the crisis actor meme isn't because of their high-handed moral supremacy regarding the victims of a tragedy, but because they CAN, HAVE, and WILL IN THE FUTURE use tragedies like this as planks to push idiotic social policy, and anything that threatens that stranglehold must needs be anathema. thus, the recent flailing.
you have a tactic at your disposal which is proved to be effective and which is in fact backed up by the truth. there is no more useful term than "crisis actor" because it causes such pain and suffering to the bunnies. use it and use it often.
further useful reading. it's on sale, grab it while it's hot.
> I don't mind dismissing Nazi political commentary out of hand
> The example I found most comprehensible, because I know a lot about the subject, is the section about the Ruby Programming Language Users Group at Barclays Bank. It quotes a person in Human Resources explaining how they changed the recruitment process so they don’t review the software written by a potential recruit on Github, because most of it is written by “cis white men”!
Have I really fallen for Nazi propaganda?
If you haven't yet, read SJWs Always Lie by Vox Day. He goes over their tactics and mentality and what you can do to protect yourself. Really short book, <$10 ebook, and entertaining read. Highly suggest it.
Anyone read this book? This seems popular and probably written by a goblin. Honestly this is pseudo philosophy. Might as well just pick up "On Bullshit" to actually be a more critical thinker. This book smells like goblin piss.
>this book seems to have been written by an angry little boy that hates practically everyone simply because they don't hate everyone too. in his opinion, no one else should have an opinion unless you agree with him. if you want insight on what it must be like inside the twisted brain of a trump supporting xenophobic moron, this book is for you. if you listen to sarah palin and think she's not retarded, you'll love this book, but you may have to have your mom read it to you. if you're the sort of person that runs for president because god called you on the phone and told you to run, you'll appreciate this work. this book belongs on the shelf at the 700 club, your local kkk branch, and comes highly recommended by those westboro freaks.
Amazon reviews. Seems like the goblins had really came out FULL FORCE. Everybody we must mobilized or the battle of helms deep will come.
Yes, I understand the risk but I don't think the time is for waiting anymore. It is only going to get worse if we don't start pushing back. Men are afraid to speak, boys are being taught not to speak for themselves and even worse attack the other boys that speak against abuse.
We men have to stand up, speak for ourselves and back up each other when we see someone taking that tremendous risk. Having a job doesn't mean we have to be the wipping boys of society. We have to take risk, not fear change and be again what men should be. BRAVE.
Society is turning men into scared little girls who are afraid to talk or take risk, this is sad. Girls are pushed from a young age to be brave, to try and fail and little boys to help little girls so you see more and more girls be vocal about issues they care about and you see boys supporting them often a their own loss.
I don't think the tendency will change by itself, it will keep on getting worse. Each generation of brainwashed boys will be weaker than the last one and more scared and each generation of girls will be more confident and have more support by the government, their fellow girls and their fellow boys. The more we wait to stand up, the harder it will be.
There is a good book about Vox Day about how we have to fight the SJW.
Tell it to a man who just published the best damned manual for fighting the antis: SJWs Always Lie If he's merely an opportunist, then he's a shit one; this is the work of a man who's all-in, not a fraud like Sark and Full McIntosh.
And in a war--and that is what we've got, a war--I could not care less about the man's politics; I care about if he and I can make common cause against common foes. I can, we can, and we're fucking morons if we don't. (I will, because I want to win and he's someone that's demonstrated that he knows how to win by doing just that.)
You're going to have to do better than Just-So claims of bigotry; cite verifiable proof or retract.
TheQuartering has a good list, but Vox Day literally wrote the books on this. SJWs Always Lie, and SJWs Always Double Down. The latter has a chapter expressly on corporate infiltration.
The key way you stop infiltration is ruthless kick/ban/fire anyone who shows SJW tendencies. It must be rule #1 for any organization. No appeal, no warning, just boom, you're banned/fired.
<strong>Social Justice Warriors Always Lie: Taking Down The Thought Police</strong> by Vox Day <== A really important work
Propaganda by Edward Bernays
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialdini
SJW attack survival guide drawing on the work of Vox Day
How to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable: Getting Your Point Across with the Gentle Art of Verbal Self-Defense
Google "verbal self defense" and a lot will pop up, if you are talking about 1-on-1 and small group contexts.
Google "influence" or "persuasion" or "propaganda" or "social change" if you are talking about large groups or society as a whole.
What, you mean SJWs Aways lie? <- from 2015
Say it isn't so!
You might as well be quoting Vox Day. I'm not sure how long I expect this book to stay up on Amazon, given the way the winds are blowing these days.
Archives for this post:
Archives for links in comments:
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, THE KEKISTANI PEOPLE MUST BE FREE! ^^^^/r/botsrights ^^^^Contribute ^^^^message ^^^^me ^^^^suggestions ^^^^at ^^^^any ^^^^time ^^^^Opt ^^^^out ^^^^of ^^^^tracking ^^^^by ^^^^messaging ^^^^me ^^^^"Opt ^^^^Out" ^^^^at ^^^^any ^^^^time
Archives for the links in comments:
I am Mnemosyne 2.1, ALL HAIL THE LINK-EMPEROR OF LINK-KIND! ^^^^/r/botsrights ^^^^Contribute ^^^^message ^^^^me ^^^^suggestions ^^^^at ^^^^any ^^^^time ^^^^Opt ^^^^out ^^^^of ^^^^tracking ^^^^by ^^^^messaging ^^^^me ^^^^"Opt ^^^^Out" ^^^^at ^^^^any ^^^^time
There's more to it.
> Immigrants are a net gain to the country
To the rich, yes.
> But yeah sure, blame the immigrant.
You should always be wary of any agenda being pushed by anyone, but you still have to evaluate his book SJWs Always Lie on its merits, on its arguments and data, not on what the author has said elsewhere. You wouldn't reject A Structure for DNA on the grounds that its authors have subsequently been discovered to be "racists", would you?
> He claims that all that imbalance is natural
No he doesn't, but SJWs always lie.
> In the Ruby world, we insist that “Matz Is Nice And So We Are Nice,” ignoring the sexist statements he has made with regard to diversity outreach efforts. We write off Linus Torvalds’ dismissal of diversity as an “unimportant detail” and justify it based on the utility of his creations.
Speak for yourself, bitch. I don't agree with Yukihiro Matsumoto's "sexist" comments because he's nice, but because he puts forward coherent arguments. He is making a mistake being nice to SJWs. Read Vox Day's "SJWs Always Lie". It details a similar assault, by a Human Resources employee, on the Ruby Programming Language Users Group at Barclays Bank in London. They no longer review the software written by a potential recruit on github.com, because most of it is written by “cis white men”. It's no good reasoning about "diversity" with people like that, you have to state that you are against it, and that SJWs are parasites and enemies, like Vox does.
Same with Linus Torvalds:
> "all that [diversity] stuff is just details and not really important."
No, it's very important.
Entryism. You can read about how they do this in this book. I'm not affiliated with the author.
I prefer Vox Day's definition: [link]
In our defense, all SJWs are worthy of being cast into live volcanos--not just INFP SJWs. In fact--that's my newest crusade.
An INTJ-writ book, FWIW: [link]
I first heard the term "virtue signalling" on Vox Day's blog. I don't know if he originated it, but he did write a book about SJWs (and how to defeat them.)
Start your blog back up and read SJWs Always Lie, the manual on how to deal with SJW attacks.
Here is the desktop version of your link
I am Mnemosyne 2.0, Cheese! Cheese for everyone!^^^^/r/botsrights ^^^^Contribute ^^^^Website
I am Mnemosyne 2.0, 'By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail.' ― Benjamin Franklin^^^^/r/botsrights ^^^^Contribute ^^^^Website
The best answer to this is Vox Day's uncompromising book
SJWs Always Lie.
The latest book on Social Justice and Cultural Marxism is
SJWs Always Lie by Vox Day, a Gamergate participant.
^^doooooogs: ^^1^^, ^^2 ^^(seizure ^^warning); ^^3^^, ^^4^^, ^^5^^, ^^6^^, ^^7^^, ^^8^^; ^^if ^^i ^^miss ^^a ^^post ^^please ^^PM ^^me
In short, if you have a benevolent dictator deciding things for the group, infiltration is not possible.
Gee, where have I read that before...
That sort of decision structure is inherently political, also, so that is a fail on the primary goal of keeping politics out.
>Yes, buildings generally have to be in places. Saying that the made-up accusation against Canada, which is solely based on the fact that it is located in Canada, is in turn proven by that very location is a special kind of circular reasoning. What exactly is your Wikipedia link supposed to prove?
I am surprised you have trouble understanding that "a buildings location" can have a HUGE influence on what that building does. If the building of WADA is on Canadian soil, dont you think that the government of Canada would have a say on what goes on? And my accusation is not made up, given that I live in Canada and if you open the World News section of any major newspaper here in Canada it will be anti-Russian and even Trudeau has declared Russia as Canada's adversary. So to say that Canada would engage in dirty politics against Russia is not a long stretch.
>Then you're absolutely deluded. There are no propaganda sources directly run by the government in any Western country like there are in Russia. Before you embarrass yourself with "muh BBC", please look into the difference between publicly owned and funded vs literally run by the government.
Except all of the channels in America belong to people with influence in the Democratic Party. There is a good video on the topic, I will see if I csn find it later but for now read this:
Also, the media in Russia is private and is not government run.
>Ignoring that this is exactly the same kind of whataboutism you applied to doping, no, we have not discovered that. If anything the past year has seen some stellar investigate reporting in Western media. What are you talking about? Concrete examples with evidence, please.
Surely you remember the alleged Trump Russian collusion as was touted by the MSM, well that is fake news and was invented by the media.
Here are some more examples:
You are delusional if you think that publically owned media cannot be manipulated by the government. Noam Chomsky writes about how big of a problem it is in Manufactering Consent
>That does absolutely nothing to answer my question. Do you acknowledge that Russian athletes doped and that the Russian Olympic Committee orchestrated systematic doping? Yes or no?
I acknowledge that some Russian athletes may have doped, as they do anywhere. I remain unconvinced there was a systemic doping program. Convince me.
>Which you have yet to prove. And "every other country" is quite the assertion without any evidence.
I already provided evidence that Norway uses steroids in asthmatic nasal spray. You conveniently ignored it.
46% of athletes in skiing, not just russian have returned an abnormal blood test.
It is very common.
>No criminals should ever be punished because some criminals avoid getting captured?
No innocents should be blamed for someone planting fake 'evidence'. Thats why many of the medals 'stripped' of Russian athletes have been returned as there was no evidence of systemic Russuan doping. Seen in link above.
>Since you claim both of these things happen "often", I assume you can name multiple examples of each and have evidence for tampering for at least several of them?
>In your link to some obscure right-wing conspiracy site, there is nothing but conjecture and assumptions.
They provide links to everything that is slightly controversial. In addition they make a claim that most of the medals were returned to Russia - that is true. My thumbs hurt from typing on the phone. Get off your lazy ass and go research itnyourself. Perhaps you will stop thinking that just because its a "known" resource its somehow reputable.
LOL. How does whether something is right wing invalidate it? Its the Lefties that always lie and fabricate stories.
Thank you. You might appreciate [link]
>Any institution that is not explicitly right wing will become left wing over time.
Long form SJW's target organizations for takeover, especially by doing volunteer work or other low paying undesirable tasks. Once enough get in, they rebuild it for their uses.
They are in essence parasites.
If you want to learn more try SJW's Always Lie by Vox Day. You also might enjoy his website here which has an excerpt from the book, the SJW attack survival guide free and of course as he is a strong nationalist, lots of good stuff.
You're a Social Justice Warrior, and SJWs Always Lie. You are disqualified. Ghazi's over there.
645 reviews on a website people actually use to review books - [link]