I'll make it easy for you: You want a (used) Sony RX100 III.
https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Premium-Compact-F1-8-2-8-DSCRX100M3/dp/B00K7O2DJU
The RX100 was the beginning of Sony's takeover of the entire camera market, from enthusiast level all the way up to full-frame pro cameras. They somehow now have a bigger market share than Nikon OR Canon. I don't know what possessed them to decide they wanted to be The Best Camera Company, but right now they're it, and the RX100 is one of the reasons.
In your shoes I'd go for the RX100 III, they switched from a 28mm-equivalent to a 24mm-equivalent on the wide end which is a non-trivial difference for taking landscape shots. It's $650 new but you can find a ton of used ones for $400ish.
Obviously the RX100 IV, V, and VI have upgraded features but I don't think any of them would be worth it for you on that tight of a budget.
They are using this camera for a lot of their shots
(http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100M-Cyber-shot-Digital-Camera/dp/B00K7O2DJU)
Basically if you want a good point and shoot you get one of the Sony rx100 models. The 1" sensor is much bigger than most other point and shoots.
I don't have experience with the RX100, but it's Aperture can supposedly go to f/1.8 so you should be able to get some shallow depth of field with it.
You can read more about it here. There are even examples of the images you can take with it. A few of them show a shallow depth of field. You could also try and find examples of image take with this camera online. Places like Flickr. I was trying to find out how well I could take photos of stars with the A6000 and ended up finding someone who took a few. That solidified my decision on buying it.
I have the A600 and love it. You will be able to more with it and its not a huge camera. You just have to lug around the extra lenses. Even the kit lenses take excellent shots. Many photographers are simply what I call "camera snobs" and will complain about a kit lens even if they haven't tried it. I use my kit lenses, but I also purchased two additional lenses with it.
I currently have a pixel 3a and it's pretty good but I want to have a budget phone + a camera that is on par with newer iPhones (12 and up). After learning the term "point and shoot" cameras I found this reddit post and I'm probably going to buy something like a Sony RX100 iii. Personally, I want something that's sturdy and I've seen a lot of stuff on the Olympus.
I'm still pretty new to this so it's a bit confusing to figure out what specs I'm trying to look for because with something like the galaxy A53, the pictures I saw online when compared to a 6a look a bit worse than the 6a bc the colors are wrong IMO.
With that said I'd much rather have an A53 for an overall phone when comparing to the Pixel 6a (as an example)
Item Name: | Sony RX100M3 |
---|---|
Price: | $275.00 |
# of Spots: | 55 @ $5.00/Spot |
Price Justification: | Sold for $748.00 in 2021 but brand new |
Price Justification: | Sold for $307.00 on 05/14/2021 |
Price Justification: | Sold for $280.00 on 05/09/2021 |
Price Justification: | Sold for $241.38 on 05/17/2021 |
Call spots? | Y |
Spot limit per person? | No |
Location/Country: | USA |
Will ship international? | USA ONLY |
Timestamp/pics: | Album + Timestamp |
Escrow: | I am for /u/kenyonlord |
Description: | Up for raffle is the Sony RX100M3. The Mark III has an adjustable tilt screen (does not flip all the way around for vlogging mode), Zeiss lens (F1.8-2.8, 24-70mm), 20.1MP, 1” sensor. Including two extra Wasabi batteries with the original Sony, power charger, original box, charger, mircoUSB, and manuals. Also has built-in fill flash and retractable viewfinder. The back screen has a screen protector on it and the body has some nicks here and there. Everything works well on it and it’s on the current firmware (2.0). I bought this new several years back and it's been my compact travel camera when I wasn't taking the A7. |
u can probably find a slightly used version that is newer than the series 1
I have a series IV and like it... but its tiny... if you are young with good eyes and can see the controls and menus... great
​
amazon warehouse has this
​
click over on the right to see the used versions... all under 500
​
if u want something easier to see... but slightly less pocketable and u want to bust your budget
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-powershot-g5-x-mark-ii-review/6
For the use case you're describing, I'd say you really need to prioritise audio.
The Sony RX-100 III is $650 on Amazon) For $100 less, you could grab a Panasonic HC-V770 ($448) + Pixel UHF Wireless Lav ($100).
​
The Panasonic has no record limit (it's a camcorder), it has a 3.5mm mic jack AND it can run power off micro-USB which is cool cause you can set it with a powerbank and it'll record for very long time. It also has WiFi, which you can use to adjust stuff without having to be near the camera.
I apologize for the "what should I buy" question that gets asked all the time, but here we go.
I'm looking at the RX100 M3 and the A6000 with 6-50mm and 55-210mm lenses
I'm a 100% total beginner and I want a camera to capture basically everything (travel, family, outdoors).
From what I can see the RX100 is only better for portability, and I'm 100% okay with a bigger camera for better pictures, but are the two lenses included enough? I'm okay with potential buying one more, but I would like to keep it to the two.
I'm also open to other suggestions!
/u/otpisani - I recommend neither. A larger sensor, interchangeable lens camera will give you more creative flexibility and options for future growth than a $698 point and shoot with a 1" sensor.
Right now, the Panasonic G7 with the 14-42mm kit lens is on sale for $497.99 [Referral Links]. In addition to higher resolution video (here is why you want to shoot 4K in 2017 and here is why material originated at 4K looks better on a 1080p monitor than material originated at 1080p), the G7 has a mic jack and can record for more than 30 minutes continuously at 1080p (the RX100 III has no mic input and is limited to 30 minutes of continuous recording - which can be a challenge if you ever want to use your camera to record a play, speech or other event).
Here is the video image quality this camera can produce:
Narrative
COUPLES: Sara & Adam (Movie Night) by Chris Sturgeon (1080p)
Your Own Size - (Short Film) Panasonic G7 with Kit Lens by Spectrum The Originator (2160p)
Unfigured (2016) short movie - filmed with Panasonic G7 by AgnosLibertine (2160p)
Stars by Tarik Dobbs (1080p)
Documentary
Fotograf Anna Ejemo (2160p)
Indianapolis 500 in 4K (2160p)
Beauty/Fashion
Automotive
AC x PD | The Hakotora by Project-Definition (shot with the kit lens)
Travel/Nature
Panasonic Lumix G7 / G70 Launch - 4K - 4KPhoto Modes (shot in photo/video mode - each frame is an 8MP still photo) (2160p)
Timelapse
Timelapse and Slow Motion
It's a pretty good still camera too: https://www.flickr.com/groups/panasonic-lumix-g7/pool/
In my view, this is a much better camera for filmmaking than a point and shoot and the best still/video camera you can buy in your price range.
If you end up buying the G7, you might also want to subscribe over at /r/PanasonicG7 - lots of knowledgeable folks there who can help you get the most out of your new camera.
Hope this is helpful and best of luck choosing the camera that best meets your needs!
You would be very happy with a Sony RX-100 iii: https://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100M-Cyber-shot-Digital-Camera/dp/B00K7O2DJU
> Not intrested in using multiple lenses as well.
Here is a link to Amazon for those that are curious in specs. http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100M-Cyber-shot-Digital-Camera/dp/B00K7O2DJU