Again, I'm not knowledgeable to attack all points made in the essay. But I will pick one point here.
Ethereum is premined. That's true. But the important point is how much the founder owns? Can you give it a guesstimate? The answer is>! less than 1%. (you can check cross check this on Google. Compared to other altcoins percentage hold by the founders, he hold significantly less. !<
Another point I subscribe to (you don't have to, but I do), is that the reversal of the DAO hack is proposed by Vitalik, but voted and decided by the community. He alone can't make people fork the chain. Yeah I know, "he and his cronies, etc.". I bet you the story of the DAO hack is a lot more nuanced and complicated than the what people say. More at https://www.amazon.com/Cryptopians-Idealism-Greed-Making-Cryptocurrency-ebook/dp/B08Y8MQ66Z
To me, ETH has its faults, but it also has many advantages and improvements over BTC. An elaborate article trashing ETH looks suspicious to me.