This wouldn't surprise, they have the tech, but this pandemic is a hoax
A book called the Invisible Rainbow about the Spanish flu pandemic suggests it was caused by the new radio towers that were going up everywhere at the time. We're roughly 70% water, obviously radiation can have an adverse effect on us.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
The Invisible Rainbow is a book. You can buy it most anywhere books are sold.
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
Its not a "conspiracy" book. But it does discuss how humans and other wildlife are effected by EM radiation, and with every advancement of technology we seem to see an epidemic, pandemic, or have some other die off event (birds, bees, etc) until things adapt to the new fields. Usually respiratory or neurological ailments.
The book was published in 2017 (my copy atleast), and in the last 10 pages hes talking about the 5G rollout in Dec19/Jan20 and and some Starlink deployment and how we will no doubt see some kind of pandemic coincide with it.
The Invisible Rainbow is a book. You can buy it most anywhere books are sold.
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
Its not a "conspiracy" book. But it does discuss how humans and other wildlife are effected by EM radiation, and with every advancement of technology we seem to see an epidemic, pandemic, or have some other die off event (birds, bees, etc) until things adapt to the new fields. Usually respiratory or neurological ailments.
The book was published in 2017 (my copy atleast), and in the last 10 pages hes talking about the 5G rollout in Dec19/Jan20 and and some Starlink deployment and how we will no doubt see some kind of pandemic coincide with it.
This is going to be a very different recommendation from what others have posted here, but take a look at The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenburg. What you are describing could very well be caused by a high sensitivity to RF (radio-frequency emissions), and EMF (electromagnetic fields). So this would be from things like cell phones, routers, Bluetooth headphones, baby monitors, a cell phone towers.
It's something that can develop over time, and then suddenly get worse and manifest itself via various neurological symptoms.
This may not be the issue at all, but I try to mention this whenever I can as it's severely overlooked in the U.S., and our safety guidelines are outdated.
I encourage everyone to read a book called “The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life” by Arthur Firstenberg
Half of the 576pages are cited sources It is a profound read to say the least that should raise a handful of questions.
Book: Amazon Link
I have no bluetooth devices. Neighbor's wifi is not detectable in my house (I've measured it). Yes, cell towers are strong sources, but they lessen with distance. I'm not close to one.
The RF issue is an inconvenient truth. No one wants to believe it's harmful, especially not the industry. The default attitude is "if it was harmful, then why would it be allowed." If you want to believe regulators and industry value your health over a global scale innovation, then go ahead.
Unfortunately the technology has become too important and enmeshed to consider its effects anymore. Most people will do a 15 minute search on this, find some articles on Forbes and proceed to say EHS isn't a real illness, RF isn't ionizing energy so it doesn't affect us, etc. All complete nonsense.
If you're interested, this book is an incredible look at electricity from its beginnings to now, including effects on all living things: "The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life"
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
You are right. I should have worded that differently. I think you can thru blood to blood or injections.
I forget the doctors name but I will look it up. He has a pretty popular clip of him explaining what viruses are. He recommends the book Arthur Firstenberg The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life.
That book does a good job of explaining how these "pandemics" really happen.
I've done a lot of research on this and all of it is linked below.
To summarize - all human created EMF, the frequencies we propagate through our devices, are harmful to biological organisms. This is pretty much undisputed fact, as there is a ton of peer-reviewed research to support it (linked below). The only question that remains is to what degree it is dangerous - this undoubtedly varies in relation to a ton of variables, from the general health of a person, to the distance of your Wi-Fi, cellphone and computer you have, to the amount you use it,...etc.
I myself am electrosensitive, meaning I can feel EMF such as Wi-Fi (I could 100% pass a double blind experiment blind-folded where someone opens or closes a Wi-FI near me and I can tell whether it is on or off). It feels like a light electric current in my body which causes tiredness over time, as well as overloads the nervous system and causes anxiety. Since I also practice meditation, this can be alleviated in that manner. When I am full of energy and at my healthiest (physically and mentally/emotionally), the effect is lessened. When I am under stressed, tired, unhealthy...it impacts me far more. In short, I simply do not use WiFi, ever.
I recommend you use cables as much as you possibly can (as I see your intention is anyway). Besides that, from my own anecdotal experience, lower bandwidth Internet, such as that on my cellphone (where the speed is less than for example with WiFi) impacts me far less. Thus I use either wired Internet or a 3G connection.
The research (copied from one of my previous comments):
There is an abundance of scientific evidence regarding the dangers of EMF emitted from a variety of sources, from cellphones to WiFi, 3G, 4G, the now spreading 5G... (feel free to copy/paste and share this freely as much as possible):
Generally about EMF:
Concerning general EMF, but also pertaining to and discussing 5G:
www.5gappeal.eu (petition signed by innumerable scientists [MD, PhD in related fields] for a moratorium on 5G. The linked website, besides housing the petition, also discusses the chronic lack of research related to the safety of 5G and the problems it poses)
www.5gspaceappeal.org/ (another petition this time related to both 5G on Earth and satellite "5G" based in space, signed by a variety of scientists and organizations ; in this case regular individuals can sign as well)
Beyond that, a fascinating book on the largely overlooked harmful effects of electromagnetism on biological organisms, including humans, replete with references to scientific research, is Arthur Firstenberg's Invisible Rainbow. A quite handy 17 page summary of the book exists, however the many, many references to scientific studies are not included in said summary.
Everyone wore gloves and masks at the early stage, at least here in Spain, and we’re still sunken in shit. They’re all lies, diseases do not spread like we’re told they do.
I saw a post here stating that transmission experiments failed to infect the subjects with the “Spanish Flu”. Couldn’t find the original post to link it so i’ll just paste it here:
————————————————
Spanish Flu Experiments Attempting to Transmit ‘Virus’ Person To Person. From Arthur Firstenberg’s “The Invisible Rainbow”. Do we need to take another look at ‘germ theory’?
A passage read from Arthur Firstenberg’s book “The Invisible Rainbow”...
Harder than you might think!
Audio book of relevant section:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9EIwo6hA6c
From "The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life" by Arthur Firstenberg.
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
PP 107-109:
“But most revealing of all were the various heroic attempts to prove the infectious nature of this disease, using volunteers. All these attempts, made in November and December 1918 and in February and March 1919, failed. One medical team in Boston, working for the United States Public Health Service, tried to infect one hundred healthy volunteers between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five.
Their efforts were impressive and make entertaining reading: “We collected the material and mucous secretions of the mouth and nose and throat and bronchi from cases of the disease and transferred this to our volunteers. We always obtained this material in the same way. The patient with fever, in bed, had a large, shallow, traylike arrangement before him or her, and we washed out one nostril with some sterile salt solutions, using perhaps 5 c.c., which is allowed to run into the tray; and that nostril is blown vigorously into the tray. This is repeated with the other nostril. The patient then gargles with some of the solution.
Next we obtain some bronchial mucus through coughing, and then we swab the mucous surface of each nares and also the mucous surface of the throat… Each one of the volunteers… received 6 c.c. of the mixed stuff that I have described. They received it into each nostril; received it in the throat, and on the eye; and when you think that 6 c.c. in all was used, you will understand that some of it was swallowed. None of them took sick.”
In a further experiment with new volunteers and donors, the salt solution was eliminated, and with cotton swabs, the material was transferred directly from nose to nose and from throat to throat, using donors in the first, second, or third day of the disease. “None of these volunteers who received the material thus directly transferred from cases took sick in any way… All of the volunteers received at least two, and some of them three ‘shots’ as they expressed it.”
In a further experiment 20 c.c. of blood from each of five sick donors were mixed and injected into each volunteer. “None of them took sick in any way.” “Then we collected a lot of mucous material from the upper respiratory tract, and filtered it through Mandler filters. This filtrate was injected into ten volunteers, each one receiving 3.5 c.c. subcutaneously, and none of these took sick in any way.”
Then a further attempt was made to transfer the disease “in the natural way,” using fresh volunteers and donors: “The volunteer was led up to the bedside of the patient; he was introduced. He sat down alongside the bed of the patients. They shook hands, and by instructions, he got as close as he conveniently could, and they talked for five minutes. At the end of the five minutes, the patient breathed out as hard as he could, while the volunteer, muzzle to muzzle (in accordance with his instructions, about 2 inches between the two), received this expired breath, and at the same time was breathing in as the patient breathed out…
After they had done this for five times, the patient coughed directly into the face of the volunteer, face to face, five different times… [Then] he moved to the next patient whom we had selected, and repeated this, and so on, until this volunteer had had that sort of contact with ten different cases of influenza, in different stages of the disease, mostly fresh cases, none of them more than three days old… None of them took sick in any way.”
“We entered the outbreak with a notion that we knew the cause of the disease, and were quite sure we knew how it was transmitted from person to person. Perhaps,” concluded Dr. Milton Rosenau, “if we have learned anything, it is that we are not quite sure what we know about the disease.”
Earlier attempts to demonstrate contagion in horses had met with the same resounding failure. Healthy horses were kept in close contact with sick ones during all stages of the disease. Nose bags were kept on horses that had nasal discharges and high temperatures. Those nose bags were used to contain food for other horses which, however, stubbornly remained healthy. As a result of these and other attempts, Lieutenant Colonel Herbert Watkins-Pitchford of the British Army Veterinary Corps wrote in July 1917 that he could find no evidence that influenza was ever spread directly from one horse to another.
(My bold, my bad).
You could have a PhD...doesn't mean you know the health implications!
And many PhDs, make that the vast majority - have zero clue.
but try that...
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
read this book, i also have numerous docs on this, if you want to understand the truth i'll upload them.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
Lol glad I could help steer you in a direction. Now Im going to have to see what "rainbows end" is.
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
Yes, there are scientific studies proving this. I have quite a few books I could recommend, but the best scientific compilation I've found is "The Invisible Rainbow" You can find it on Amazon here. Largest bibliography I've seen in a book on that topic.
https://ehtrust.org/ is another great resource. They have pulled together a bunch of studies and resources.
A great book to look into is The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenberg
I hear you, that test might tell me that it doesn't happen every time. But as long as it's not too time consuming, I just try and avoid additional exposure (I realize it's basically everywhere at this point, and will only get more intense).
This book may open a perspective on it for you "The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life" https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096 But I acknowledge it's pervasiveness, similar to cigarette smoke before they banned indoor smoking. It was everywhere and almost pointless in trying to avoid it. It's crazy the amount of downvotes you get for even suggesting that it might pose a problem.
I usually go into airplane mode when sleeping.
First, avoiding beans and vegetables makes perfect sense for some people with leaky gut or sensitivities to plant toxins or anti nutrients. If you're doing well on a plant based diet, good for you, no need to change anything.
Second, here is my reply to another commenter below:
I'm sorry you feel that way, it is a fact that there are well over 30,000 peer reviewed studies on the biological effects that non-ionizing radiation has on bioelectrical creatures such as humans, bees, birds, and insects.
You seem a bit biased but if you're willing to open your eyes to challenging your own stances and beliefs I'd highly recommend reading through some research below and reading The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenburg, it's an incredible book. There is a zero percent chance that you read that and come away thinking nothing of electromagnetic fields and their interactions with biology.
The Bioinitiative report has plenty of documented research of proven biological harm from very small amounts of non-ionizing radiation, you need only look to see it.
There is one thing we need to examine and keep an eye on with these kinds of things... such as with the tobacco, pharma, processed food, etc, industry funded studies tend to get more publicity and tend to look more favorably on the subject, while if you look, non industry funded studies get buried and don't look so favorably on it. Why might that be, you should ask yourself?
Data compiled by Dr. Henry Lai from the University of Washington shows that funding matters. As it always has. Do not trust the wolf to guard the hen house.
We spent over 5 decades arguing scientifically and socially whether smoking cigarettes was harmful! I mean, come on.
Sure, is the EMF Protection industry full of snake oil? You bet it is. Stupid phone stickers everywhere you look, which is unfortunate.
But is not sticking a radiating phone next to your head and instead putting it on a desk on speaker "snake oil"? You need only spend time independently and openly investigating that to come to the correct conclusion.
I'm sorry you feel that way, it is a fact that there are well over 30,000 peer reviewed studies on the biological effects that non-ionizing radiation has on bioelectrical creatures such as humans, bees, birds, and insects.
You seem a bit biased but if you're willing to open your eyes to challenging your own stances and beliefs I'd highly recommend reading through some research below and reading The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life by Arthur Firstenburg, it's an incredible book. There is a zero percent chance that you read that and come away thinking nothing of electromagnetic fields and their interactions with biology.
The Bioinitiative report has plenty of documented research of proven biological harm from very small amounts of non-ionizing radiation, you need only look to see it.
There is one thing we need to examine and keep an eye on with these kinds of things... such as with the tobacco, pharma, processed food, etc, industry funded studies tend to get more publicity and tend to look more favorably on the subject, while if you look, non industry funded studies get buried and don't look so favorably on it. Why might that be, you should ask yourself?
Data compiled by Dr. Henry Lai from the University of Washington shows that funding matters. As it always has. Do not trust the wolf to guard the hen house.
We spent over 5 decades arguing scientifically and socially whether smoking cigarettes was harmful! I mean, come on.
Sure, is the EMF Protection industry full of snake oil? You bet it is. Stupid phone stickers everywhere you look, which is unfortunate.
But is not sticking a radiating phone next to your head and instead putting it on a desk on speaker "snake oil"? You need only spend time independently and openly investigating that to come to the correct conclusion.
This is a good book for ignorant people like you: The Invisible Rainbow
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
Mandatory read for EMF sensitive people: "The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life"
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
I'm not going to dig but here's a few things..
5g causing flu like symptoms aka covid -
In The Invisible Rainbow, Firstenberg traces the history of electricity from the early eighteenth century to the present, making a compelling case that many environmental problems, as well as the major diseases of industrialized civilization—heart disease, diabetes, and cancer—are related to electrical pollution.
https://www.amazon.ca/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
DIA declassified report on emf effects.. Not sure the links work, but you can find the report floating around,, microwaves bad for body..
https://emfrefugee.blogspot.com/2016/01/1976-us-defense-intelligence-agency.html
Bill gates funding wuhan lab and 'science' in China..
https://www.worldtribune.com/emails-detail-multiple-efforts-by-gates-foundation-fauci-to-assist-chinas-international-exchanges/
Not quite 'a chip in the vaccine'
https://americanmilitarynews.com/2021/04/pentagon-develops-implantable-microchip-to-detect-covid-19/
Not sure wtf this stuff is, but DARPA hydrogel wouldn't be too far off, although it would be much smaller.. I can't find the glow in the dark like string they were advertising for 'future' jabberoos
https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/japan-finds-stainless-steel-particles-in-suspended-doses-of-moderna-vaccine-1.5569480
I don't want to look for the UK, australian or US ones, but the UK ones the people are calling prison towns.. And I think the US is called 'shelter in place' centers or something.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6UT7x-0h6k
Yep.
This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.
High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
You will have to wait, finding it right now in my search history will be dreadful.
Meanwhile, you can read two books:
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
and
and bonus book:
I’ve been reading a book about this and it’s actually pretty interesting: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1645020096/
Read “The Invisible Rainbow” linked here all technological advancements have been detrimental to human health and safety
There is an abundance of scientific evidence regarding the dangers of EMF emitted from a variety of sources, from cellphones to WiFi, 3G, 4G, the now spreading 5G... (feel free to copy/paste and share this freely as much as possible):
Generally about EMF:
Concerning general EMF, but also pertaining to and discussing 5G:
www.5gappeal.eu (petition signed by innumerable scientists [MD, PhD in related fields] for a moratorium on 5G. The linked website, besides housing the petition, also discusses the chronic lack of research related to the safety of 5G and the problems it poses)
www.5gspaceappeal.org/ (another petition this time related to both 5G on Earth and satellite "5G" based in space, signed by a variety of scientists and organizations ; in this case regular individuals can sign as well)
Beyond that, a fascinating book on the largely overlooked harmful effects of electromagnetism on biological organisms, including humans, replete with references to scientific research, is Arthur Firstenberg's Invisible Rainbow. A quite handy 17 page summary of the book exists, however the many, many references to scientific studies are not included in said summary.
Firstenberg actually claims electromagnetic radiation in a variety of forms is co-responsible for a myriad of human health problems, including the Spanish Flu (in those times radio-frequencies in the forms of radio, radar....just started their rise). Fascinating stuff really.
He also correlates the rise in 5G with the launching of a variety of micro-satellites in orbit (he does this not in the book, which is older, but in his newer articles) that emit frequencies down to create super-fast Internet (a good example is Elon Musk's Starlink, but there are other companies launching these satellites as well). It is actually true that as the satellites started to get launched towards the end of 2019, this virus slowly started creeping up....
Great find!
If anyone is interested in the scientific evidence for the potential link between EMF (including, but not limited to, 5G) and this virus, this is the research I've done on it:
While the virus may not be caused by 5G, exposure could most certainly weaken one's immune system to where the body has a more difficult time coping with the illness.. The .pdfs on the site cover many peer-reviewed studies done in this area.
For more on the (un)safety of 5G:
https://bioinitiative.org/ - a website containing a ton of scientific papers (and their summaries) on the dangerous effects of EMF (here are the abstracts covering the scientific literature of peer-reviewed papers)
www.5gappeal.eu (petition signed by innumerable scientists [MD, PhD in related fields] for a moratorium on 5G. The linked website, besides housing the petition, also discusses the chronic lack of research related to the safety of 5G and the problems it poses)
www.5gspaceappeal.org/ (another petition this time related to both 5G on Earth and satellite "5G" based in space, signed by a variety of scientists and organizations ; in this case regular individuals can sign as well)
Not to mentiom that 5G can be used to ramp up the surveillance state by a thousand fold — but that's another story altogether...
Beyond that, a fascinating book on the largely overlooked harmful effects of electromagnetism on biological organisms, including humans, replete with references to scientific research, is Arthur Firstenberg's Invisible Rainbow. A quite handy 17 page summary of the book exists, however the many, many references to scientific studies are not included in said summary.
Firstenberg actually claims electromagnetic radiation in a variety of forms is co-responsible for a myriad of human health problems, including the Spanish Flu (in those times radio-frequencies in the forms of radio, radar....just started their rise). Fascinating stuff really.
He also correlates the rise in 5G with the launching of a variety of micro-satellites in orbit that emit frequencies down to create super-fast Internet (a good example is Elon Musk's Starlink, but there are other companies launching these satellites as well). It is actually true that as the satellites started to get launched towards the end of 2019, this virus slowly started creeping up....
Here you go mate, this is the research I've done on it, all backed by solid science:
While the virus may not be caused by 5G, exposure could most certainly weaken one's immune system to where the body has a more difficult time coping with the illness.. The .pdfs on the site cover many peer-reviewed studies done in this area.
For more on the (un)safety of 5G:
https://bioinitiative.org/ - a website containing a ton of scientific papers (and their summaries) on the dangerous effects of EMF (here are the abstracts covering the scientific literature of peer-reviewed papers)
www.5gappeal.eu (petition signed by innumerable scientists [MD, PhD in related fields] for a moratorium on 5G. The linked website, besides housing the petition, also discusses the chronic lack of research related to the safety of 5G and the problems it poses)
www.5gspaceappeal.org/ (another petition this time related to both 5G on Earth and satellite "5G" based in space, signed by a variety of scientists and organizations ; in this case regular individuals can sign as well)
Not to mentiom that 5G can be used to ramp up the surveillance state by a thousand fold — but that's another story altogether...
Beyond that, a fascinating book on the largely overlooked harmful effects of electromagnetism on biological organisms, including humans, replete with references to scientific research, is Arthur Firstenberg's Invisible Rainbow. A quite handy 17 page summary of the book exists, however the many, many references to scientific studies are not included in said summary.
Firstenberg actually claims electromagnetic radiation in a variety of forms is co-responsible for a myriad of human health problems, including the Spanish Flu (in those times radio-frequencies in the forms of radio, radar....just started their rise). Fascinating stuff really.
He also correlates the rise in 5G with the launching of a variety of micro-satellites in orbit that emit frequencies down to create super-fast Internet (a good example is Elon Musk's Starlink, but there are other companies launching these satellites as well). It is actually true that as the satellites started to get launched towards the end of 2019, this virus slowly started creeping up....
Thank you for responding in a normal, civilized fashion and even providing counter arguments / sources. For posting this research I have been called a "schizo", a "Russian disinfo agent" and a "conspiracy theorist" with pretty much zero counter arguments refuting the research I've presented. I understand Reddit loves technology and people are terrified of information like this, information that may well mean their every-day exposure to EMF is already unsafe (not to mention what may still come), but the experience of posting this has left me awe stricken in human ignorance and stupidity.
I will check the counter-sources you posted, so thanks for the links.
Even if Pall is only partially correct, I have no doubt that many consequences will be side-lined or attributed to something else entirely. The consequences could also be gradual and will only show their full force years from now after much is sadly already too late... But hey, if people don't even give a shit about other types of pollution, I can't sadly imagine them doing so over electromagnetic smog...
My own personal anecdotal experience is also one of electromagnetic sensitivity, whereby I can easily feel EMF in my vicinity when its concentration is high (Wi-Fi especially for example). I could be blind-folded and know when the Wi-Fi on my laptop has been turned on or off simply by the sensations present in my body, so there is absolutely no question this is not a nocebo effect. It is definitely bothersome and has made me stop using Wi-Fi entirely.
Ultimately more time will tell who is right, as we slip into ever more global EMF coverage. Sadly, I believe that time is something we do not have. Much like climate change, the harmful effects are already present for all biological organisms and will only increase. But in our current tech-obsessed society, not many care about that, or wish to be inconvenienced by science that goes against their vision of a "Smart" future (even though that Smart future will largely be turned against them by authoritarian governments and corporations through mass surveillance and control - at least that people somewhat partially can see).
P.S.: A fascinating book on the largely overlooked harmful effects of electromagnetism on biological organisms, including humans, replete with references to scientific research, is Arthur Firstenberg's Invisible Rainbow. A quite handy 17 page summary of the book exists, however the many, many references to scientific studies are not included in said summary.
First you need to understand historical flu in a new light. From 1870s onward. Do you like to read books?
Try this:
https://www.amazon.com/Invisible-Rainbow-History-Electricity-Life/dp/1645020096
My bad wrong name i didnt think anyone cared.
The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life https://www.amazon.com/dp/1645020096/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_i_mLyoFbCFQQW77
You won't be bored if you read this
I completely understand your perspective.
Firstly, I do think it's not the best to simply rely on authority figures (especially in terms of the amount of authority figures) in order to come to any definitive scientific conclusions about a topic. Authority figures in terms of science have been wrong many times throughout history, so one cannot come to definitive answers through their opinions alone (that does not mean they have no value, however basing one's perspective on their view alone, without examining counter claims and factual evidence, is not enough to get the full view of the picture).
Vaccine skeptics, even Axo's articles, do not say vaccines don't work, they simply point to the fact that the safety measures regarding vaccines and the independent research done on them is far too small. If you check the opinions of certain doctors that do believe in vaccines, they will often state that the pros with the vaccines outweigh the cons. This however, does not mean that vaccines have no cons and no dangers. They are a very popular solution that will work differently in different people - and in some, the reactions may be (and are, I actually know people that have had bad reactions from vaccines) very severe. There are a lot of factors here and it's not as simple as the propaganda states - and the propaganda usually states that vaccines are unanimously good, without question. This leaves no room for the skeptics to be labelled anything but "anti-vaxxers", when many of the skeptics aren't even completely against vaccines!
As said, I understand your position, I would simply nudge you, if you are ever curious, to look at the research and objections pointed out by the skeptics. Only through debate can we ensure a brighter, healthier future for us all. If you want an alternative view, you can listen to this:
Medical Doctors on the issue of vaccine safety:
Oh and regarding the Spanish flu being caused by the electrical grid. Again, I understand that this assertion might seen utterly bizarre to many that haven't really dug into these topics. However a researcher and engineer, Arthur Firstenberg, has written an expansive book on the subject of how electricity and electromagnetic radiation has caused great harm to our biosphere and human health in general. His book, the Invisible Rainbow, is replete with scientific references (100 pages +) and has been praised by many scientists and professors (you can check that on Amazon). I understand that you won't likely be buying this book in order to prove or disprove the assertions of the rise of electricity being correlated to various degenerative and pandemic illnesses, however there is a short 16 page summary of this book, that is available here:
If you are interested and not invested emotionally in this topic either, I highly recommend you check it out.
Well, here's my short contribution for the time being -
I've been researching the connection between 5G/EMF and the Coronavirus, as my curiosity was peaked by this video and it all led me down a pretty weird rabbit-hole.
I was certain it was mostly bullshit at first, but now I'm not so sure anymore. All roads led me to a book by Arthur Firstenberg, called the Invisible Rainbow. The book's main premise is that one of the fundamental problems wreaking havoc to our health today and causing epidemics and pandemics (as well as destroying the environment) is the immense amount of electrosmog present. But not only EMF on Earth, but especially from the sky (I'm talking about satellites of course). It connects a variety of disease outbreaks to the continuous increase of electrosmog in our environment and atmosphere, ranging from radio-transmitters at first, to covering the planet with radar, starting to place satellites in orbit, the cellphone and GPS revolution, all the way to the Internet and its rapid spread.
Funnily enough (or perhaps terrifyingly enough) there have been no real new significant satellite launches in terms of the global telecommunications industry since the beginning of the millennium. All till now that is. With Elon Musk and his Starlink program, as well as others that are following suit, the launching of these satellites en masse very interestingly correlates with the increase of this virus (something Firstenberg warned about two years ago in an article).
The book is greatly praised both by scientists and other reviewers (just check its Amazon page) and contains a large slew of references to studies and other scientific data. I have found a pirated copy online, but will purchase it if I decide to read it to support the author.
Here is an interesting summary of said book:
So that's pretty bad all in all. Ultimately for the individual, meditative and spiritual practices could offer great protection from the increase in radiation exposure, as those practices themselves help strengthen the subtle body (and electricity itself is merely an aspect of the physical manifestation of subtle energies such as prana), as would spending time in nature, eating and living healthy in general. However since most people aren't doing any of that (or at least not most of those things) I wonder what is going to happen.
Indeed if this is true, then the continuation of the launching of satellites into orbit will quite likely help create and spread the second wave of this pandemic. I hope I'm wrong though.
Absolutely true.
There is an abundance of scientific evidence regarding the dangers of EMF emitted from a variety of sources, from cellphones to WiFi, 3G, 4G, the now spreading 5G... (feel free to copy/paste and share this freely as much as possible):
Generally about EMF:
Concerning general EMF, but also pertaining to and discussing 5G:
www.5gappeal.eu (petition signed by innumerable scientists [MD, PhD in related fields] for a moratorium on 5G. The linked website, besides housing the petition, also discusses the chronic lack of research related to the safety of 5G and the problems it poses)
www.5gspaceappeal.org/ (another petition this time related to both 5G on Earth and satellite "5G" based in space, signed by a variety of scientists and organizations ; in this case regular individuals can sign as well)
Beyond that, a fascinating book on the largely overlooked harmful effects of electromagnetism on biological organisms, including humans, replete with references to scientific research, is Arthur Firstenberg's Invisible Rainbow. A quite handy 17 page summary of the book exists, however the many, many references to scientific studies are not included in said summary.