>err...this happens all the time. It is easy to give someone's words a different spin by omitting context.
What "spin"? There is no additional words surrounding the quote written by someone else. It is a quote on its own. It cannot possibly be " spinned". What you're saying makes no sense.
>He is talking specifically about methods to resist violent and brutal US aggression, with resistance to imperialism in Vietnam as his model. He notes that to become an effective fighter you have to incorporate a hatred of the occupier and his brutality. This isn't much different to the type of wartime rhetoric used by any other nation.
Totally false. Now you are spinning. No, it is not true that being a cold blooded killer is just what any soldier from any nation is called upon to be. A cold blooded killer is something far different.
Brutal US aggression? Don't be ridiculous. He was talking to his soldiers becoming cold blooded killers for such massacres as at La Cabaña Fortress where him and his thugs murdered innocent civilians.
>He didn't say that though. The infographic changes the words and omits a key part at the end. Here is the actual quotation: "If the rockets had remained, we would have used them all and directed them against the very heart of the United States, including New York, in our defense against aggression"
It is not a defense against aggression to murder millions of innocent civilians in a city centre you psycho. Why the hell are you actually trying to defend Che? Adding "to defend against aggression" does not excuse it at all. It would be like claiming if we added "to defend against aggression" for everything Hitler said about killing people would suddenly make everyone who quoted from him in horror as "pshaw, you're quoting out of context, he was just defending that's all."
I seriously cannot believe I am here reading you trying to defend this psycho. Oh no no no, you're not really defending him, you're just making sure to add inconsequential tidbits and then pretend the criticisms are all unfair, and that Che was just a swell guy who has a bad rap.
Pathetic!
>No it isn't.
Yes it is.
Again, it is quoted in thousands of places.
http://www.amazon.com/Longest-Romance-Mainstream-Media-Castro/dp/1594036675/
If you want a good source of Che's works, you can view them here:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/guevara/works.htm
Goddamn you are religious.