1) A successful Gallipoli (or some other events which would have ended the war earlier) means either Germany (or the counterparts, whose option is not entertained by the English speakers) would have capitulated earlier.
2) Without millions of natives being mobilized the natives would have been mostly powerless to resist against increasing Western encroachment. Even after WW2, the Mau Maus in Kenya were defeated in the end (and Jomo Kenyatta, who did respect the rights of whites to live like gods in Kenya, was put into power). And that was AFTER there were lots of arms and lots of people who could draw arms in there.
In this scenario the damage is minimized, less need to draft people from what was not part of the civilized world to have them a taste of civ which they began to crave, and the lack of an experience of seeing the whites slaughtered just like themselves and dispelling the myth of colonial superiority, would have changed things a lot.
Without the need to feed and maintain billions of people in the aforementioned countries, more resources, plus the talents which were not wantonly killed for the duration of the Great War plus their descendants, would have led the world to Type I Civilization (translation: colonies around the Solar System) before 2000.
https://www.amazon.com/Loud-Blast-That-Tears-Skies-ebook/dp/B01BA7DPA8
This book starts with a spaceship going to a moon of Jupiter , shot from German SW Africa (nobody called it Namibia back then although this book did), in 1965 by a Herr Osimov (Asimov). Later it says everyone in that place was simply 'relocated' to make it completely empty of any intrusion. Basically, that book argues a blast of the Tunguska meteor, if it exploded over London instead on 1908, would have been a HUGE blessing in disguise for the humanity, avoiding the World Wars (and being quite silent about the fate of the people who lived in the colonies back then).