From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

1 point

·
31st Oct 2019

http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm

"The effect [of ether-drift] has persisted throughout. After considering all the possible sources of error, there always remained a positive effect." — Dayton Miller (1928, p.399)

"My opinion about Miller's experiments is the following. ... Should the positive result be confirmed, then the special theory of relativity and with it the general theory of relativity, in its current form, would be invalid. Experimentum summus judex. Only the equivalence of inertia and gravitation would remain, however, they would have to lead to a significantly different theory." — Albert Einstein, in a letter to Edwin E. Slosson, 8 July 1925 (from copy in Hebrew University Archive, Jerusalem.) See citations below for Silberstein 1925 and Einstein 1926.

"I believe that I have really found the relationship between gravitation and electricity, assuming that the Miller experiments are based on a fundamental error. Otherwise, the whole relativity theory collapses like a house of cards." — Albert Einstein, in a letter to Robert Millikan, June 1921 (in Clark 1971, p.328)

"You imagine that I look back on my life's work with calm satisfaction. But from nearby it looks quite different. There is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm, and I feel uncertain whether I am in general on the right track." — Albert Einstein, on his 70th birthday, in a letter to Maurice Solovine, 28 March 1949 (in B. Hoffman Albert Einstein: Creator and Rebel 1972, p.328)

https://www.amazon.com/Ocean-Universe-Dr-Robert-Straitt/dp/1512083887

In 1920, Albert Einstein gave a presentation in which he postulated a principal of relativity that was so against the consensus of science of its day that it was not even challenged it was simply ignored. Einstein’s supposition, if it were validated, would have unraveled popular scientific and mathematical theory all based on the outcomes of several similar experiments with one commonality; a simple but fatal flaw in their Design of Experiment. How would science and mathematics be different today had Einstein’s factual assertions been heard over the popular avowals of consensus belief based on fatally flawed logic and experimentation? Within the covers of this book, we relive the last hundred years of science through a repeatable process of observational analysis, which incorporates the long ignored central preposition of Relativity.

< $25

< $25

< $50