What is Reddit's opinion of
Unmasked: Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
By popularity on Reddit, this product is:
32 reviews of this product found across Reddit:
They have chapters, training materials, legal teams, you are literally trying to gaslight people with this nonsense.
Andy Ngo's book breaks all of it down.
https://www.amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
For anyone who wants to read actual proof against what this asshole is talking about.
I suppose Antifa should boycott Amazon next.
Side note: I didn’t even know Andy Ngo had a book, but now I do!
Paras mitä löysit oli konservatiivilehden mielipidekirjoitus tyypiltä joka uskoo Antifalla olevan jokin salainen suunnitelma maan tuhoamiseksi?
> Andy Ngo is author of the upcoming book “<em>Unmasked: Inside Antifa’s Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy.</em>”
BLM:n tukeminen ei ole väkivaltaan yllyttämistä, 97% mielenosoituksista oli täysin rauhanomaisia. Loppuihin liittyi toki mellakointia ja ryöstelyä, jonka valtamediat tuomitsivat. Monessa mellakassa virkavalta oli itse eskaloivana osapuolena.
Andy Ngo has pointed out that many of Antifa's ranks are trans, and they're all marxists. He's written a book on this. Link
I'm not sure they're all learned/conditioned, would be interesting to find out how big % of them were sissy cismen before. Shame GenderCritical sub was taken down, there were threads there where people pointed this pattern out, including the pattern of many people in mtf subs saying how wearing a dress made them hard.
Andy Ngo an author who reported Antifa and wrote a book titled “Unmasked: Inside Antifa’s Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy.” .
There are many graffitis with his name to kill him. And he’s been getting allot of death threats. He’s calling as it is. He’s been attacked multiple times. And when a police arrested an assailant, the assailant gets bailed out by antifa.
I don't know who that is, but I searched his name on Amazon. Is this the book you're referencing?
"Unmasked: Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy"
This shitwaste book has 4.9 stars on Amazon, and the praises are nearly identical - denouncing Antifa as violent, dismissing the right to self defense, paradoxes in the rights to own firearms.
These are the people you are dealing with. Make no mistake - you will never win an argument with people who can believe diametrically opposed ideas. You waste your breathe and time even trying.
These people do not care about you. They dont care if you are poor, trans, physically threatened - they will make every excuse they can to oppress the same "rights" they claim hold so dear. The facade of liberty has a bitter taste.
About how violent Antifa is...kinda ironic
​
https://www.amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
It’s currently the #1 best selling book on Amazon right now.
And an ironic #2 behind it. (Orwell’s 1984).
https://www.amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
I've not read it myself. I hear it is about Andy following America's Antifa over the years, specifically Portland's chapter.
UPDATE: As of Thursday night/Friday, Andy NGO’s book has skyrocketed to 1st place on Amazon’s best seller list
O livro: https://www.amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
No dia deste "protesto" a livraria fechou as portas e o livro foi retirado das prateleiras e só será vendido online.
O "protestantes" reclamam que isso não é suficiente e prometem continuar a impedir a livraria de funcionar normalmente.
Powell’s books in Portland. A store which said it won’t carry that [book](www.amazon.com/dp/154605958X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glc_fabc_4elbGbE4ESMVG) in its store only online.
hardcover, on amazon. (yes, i know amazon sucks)
You might want to read this....
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
> Both of your major political parties are in the right part of most European countries' political spectrum.
Wait do you think Im american? Im Irish. Born and raised.
>Compared to the rest of the world, the US parties skew very heavily to the right, with some mainstream part probably being extreme right elsewhere. Food for thought, maybe.
This is just wholly untrue. The left in the US is exceedingly far to the left on many issues the most glaringly obvious being abortion which for example is around first trimester only in the EU while many US states allow second trimester abortions and some up until birth and even in cases where an abortion fails and the baby is delivered. Theres massive differences between the EU and the US to be sure but to say the US is just a right wing haven with tiny pockets of moderate left wing values is just wrong.
>And I was just going from your comments earlier where you stated they are all communists and then explained that this is because they self-identify as socialist.
The occupy movements were the ones identifying as socialist though as time goes on more and more identify as communist. BLM groups are majority openly communist not socialist and antifa was literally founded by communists and every single antifa group I have ever seen which is a lot have identified as communist and called openly for a communist revolution. I dont know how much more explicit they need to be for others to accept their communist leanings.
>I'm just too uninformed to have a well-founded opinion on what they do and demand, though the few things that did end up getting to me sounded a lot like "everybody should have basic human rights" as other people have quoted here. Honestly, that should not even be controversial.
The statement on its own is not controversial. What they deem to be a human right and what is required in their eyes to get those rights is where the controversy comes in.
>But the caveat is always that I never got a full picture and whatever info got to me was purely by chance and can't be complete, so it may very well have been cherry-picked by someone favoring them.
Well for a great overview of the antifa crowd including insider info on the Portland cells youy could always check out this book. Its written by a homosexual asian journalist that the Portland Antifa groups regularly attacked and beaten. They also allegedly put a price on his head. Bit of a biased source admittedly but most of the information is fact based rather than opinion.
I've been considering whether it's worth writing a long reply. I decided I might as well, so here we go, point by point.
>Sure, but you’re aware that everything you just listed could be tied to religious or supremacist extremism as well right?
Yes indeed I am, that's why I called wokeism a surrogate religion. Just because other extremist groups do bad things does not mean that it's ok for the woke cult to do them, quite the opposite.
>The only difference is, religion as well as supremacy are actually committing terrorism and killing, Let's talk about terrorism. The dictionary definition of the word is "using violence or intimidation to advance a political or religious position." This is precisely what the woke twitter mob does. For example, they recently drove Daphne Dorman, a friend of Dave Chapelle into suicide. They did the same to Alex Halowka, an ex-boyfriend of notorious SJW Zoe Quinn. There is at least half a dozen or so other prominent cases that I don't care to remember. I could also mention the numerous attempts at ruining people's lives, such as the case of James Damore, Lindsay Ellis, Jenna Marbles, Phil Mason (a.k.a. Thunderf00t), J. K. Rowling and many, many other people. The purpose of this behavior is intimidation for political reasons, i.e. terrorism.
>marginalizing Can you define the term for me, and give concrete examples? Bonus points for examples that are not also committed by the woke left.
>as well as covering up mass sexual assault. This is very ironic. I refer you to this and this. In case you're wondering why this is relevant: the local government covered up the abuse for decades because they were afraid of being called Islamophobic by the woke cult.
> Ultra woke kids are just being annoying on Twitter In light of the examples I gave (and believe me, I could give many, many more), do you think the term "annoying" is appropriate?
>you’re failing to acknowledge the duality of the subject What do you mean by duality? Do other groups commit bad things? Yes. But those other groups are rightfully marginalized and scorned, whereas the woke left has completely taken over Hollywood, Silicon Valley, most universities and parts of the US and other governments.
>but they are not the one committing mass crimes on humanity. The main reason they don't is because they do not have total power yet. We live in a relatively wealthy, peaceful society. People are more sensitive to violence than they were back in the days of the Bolsheviks and the Nazis. The woke have to keep a low profile for the most part, but my reading of history clearly suggests that this will only last until they get to actually wield political power instead of sniping at people's livelihoods on Twitter.
>Plus you mentioned fascism, but the supposed “woke mob” is against this, and authoritarianism is as much a threat in this day and age if not more. The woke left is nothing if not authoritarian. Let's talk about Fascism. Fascism is a somewhat loosely defined collection of similar ideologies that are characterized by collectivism, authoritarianism (in fact I believe it was Mussolini who coined the term 'totalitarianism'), support of political violence, dogmatism and hyper-nationalism. Antifa (who have been rightly classified as a domestic terrorist organization in most western countries) are characterized by collectivism, authoritarianism, support of political violence, dogmatism and hyper-internationalism. They are the people who re-define everyone who opposes them as a Fascist, and then proclaim that it's ok to "punch a Nazi". The less radical woke left often hides behind the the term "diversity of tactics". This means that they don't have the balls to go out and commit arson, vandalism and assault, but they support Antifa when they do it. You will rarely find a woke personality who will readily condemn Antifa and their terrorism. I would strongly recommend "Unmasked" by Andy Ngo (a gay Asian man who is hunted by Antifa for his wrongthink).
From a liberal perspective, the Fascists and the woke are peas in a pod, equally awful and to be equally resisted.
>White supremacy and extremism are responsible for terrorism. White supremacy is a tiny, insignificant force in the Western world. Case in point: Richard Spencer, the alt-right poster boy barely got a few hundred views on his videos before his YouTube account was banned. My favorite development with this guy was his post-Charlottsville meltdown (I recommend you watch it, it cracks me up every time). It has been remarked accurately that the demand for Nazis vastly outstrips the supply. The woke left therefore has invented the term "far right", which is malleable enough to encompass even figures like Sam Harris, Glenn Greenwald, Jimmy Dore and Noam Chomsky.
> Religion and the church are responsible for the marginalization and brainwashing of millions, as well the mass raping of children and covering it up. When it comes to hive minds, they are up the among the most evil.
Two wrongs don't make a right. Just because other movements are bad does not mean that wokeism isn't also bad. Fortunately for all of us, wokeism is on its way out the door, or at least I hope so.
How are they not? They attack people (sometimes randomly, such as the trans person who was beaten by an Antifa crowd, leading to the "kicked in the face from behind guy" video), scream ideological nonsense at normal people/police/counter-protestors, set fire to municipal structures and private property (in Portland and beyond), constantly try to prevent information about their activities and collaboration from getting out (censorship by violence), etc, etc, among other things.
Hell, even Wikipedia has the integrity to admit that Antifa "engages in protesting and other tactics, including digital activism, doxing, harassment, physical violence, and property damage", yet their article clarifies that Antifa does all this to "people who antifa identifies as being fascists and racists, such as neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other far-right extremists", but that's pretty goddamn tenuous when they're a hard-left group who identifies anyone to even the slight right of them as a Nazi. To them, the center-left might as well be Heinrich Himmler.
If you'd like to know more, you can always buy Andy Ngo's book about Antifa, wherein he details exactly how they operate (like ISIS cells, if you were curious) and all of the fucking evil fascist-like shit they've done (and still do).
They took the name from an anti-fascist group, but even that first German group was comprised of communists. Sure, it's good to be against fascism. But being a communist isn't better.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X - well we can add that to the list of things you are completely wrong about.
Keep peddling your crap Antifa shill.
Unmasked: Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy https://smile.amazon.com/dp/154605958X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_D8X4YXMSZGAZGKA9CHFY
There's a whole book about them:
https://www.amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X
[Great book on Antifa tactics from a journalist who reported on them for years.](amazon.com/Unmasked-Antifas-Radical-Destroy-Democracy/dp/154605958X)
It's cheaper on Amazon.
Unmasked: Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy https://www.amazon.com/dp/154605958X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_DRWYPJMJM8QMW3JS2YRG
Popular alternatives to Unmasked: Inside Antifa's R...
Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters
Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media
