What is Reddit's opinion of Bank of America Mobile Banking?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.infonow.bofa&hl=en_US&gl=US

For apps that don't show, you can click a Play Store link and select open it in the aurora store.

Searching the inline autofill and "autofill and save" option is the easiest. For example from the Bank of America app login page, if you search for "Bank of America" and bring up your BOA creds and select the autofill and save option, the following will get added to your BOA creds as a new matching uri:

androidapp://com.infonow.bofa

Which corresponds to the apps Java/Kotlin packaging name. You can find this in the share url for the particular app on the Google playstore.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.infonow.bofa

But again, using Autofill and Save should keep you from needing to find it manually.

Everyone's business is different. Here's what works for me

• BofA
• Counter
• Docs
• Dropbox
• Hangouts Dialer
• Home Depot
• Inbox
• Keep
• Office Lens
• Pinterest
• Sheets
• Sunrise
• Telegram
• Translate
• Venmo
• Voxer
• Voyager
• Waze
• Weather Timeline

List made using List My Apps

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.infonow.bofa

A missed opportunity for big evil.

Lets take the Jeep remote hack as an example. If the engineers of the hack were instead malicious, they could have hacked over a million vehicles, and cut the transmission if the car reaches 60 miles per hour. Can you imagine the number of fatalities that would occur from such an attack? We held Ford accountable for the Pinto and told the auto industry that lack of reliability because its cheaper to settle the lawsuits than make a safe car was unacceptable. We should hold all industries to that standard.

I am not saying 100% secure. You keep putting those words in my mouth. You cannot seem to accept that there are grades between totally secure and new bug every day code. There are levels of security inbetween. We can both agree that a bug every month is 30 times more secure than a bug every day. That is what higher level of security can offer and is at least an order of magnitude more secure than Android and IOS. That validation code and sanity checking sounds awesome, so why doesnt Google use it on Android, because there is literally no reason besides money not to? Or if they already do, it lets a disturbing number of serious, non-OS related errors through the cracks. The something we should be putting critical information on should not be this easy to break into. Surely we can agree that.

I literally gave you the INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR IT SECURITY. Google abides by it and has certified Android to the standard, just like everybody else. My major complaint is the security the Evaluation Assurance Level for Android is CERTIFIED to protect is inadequate for the data they wish to protect. You are asserting vague notions of what is secure and what is acceptable when I am directly referencing THE STANDARD.

The exposure that you yourself acknowledge on an Android device is so high, a user should absolutely expect their bank information should be stolen on a daily basis. However major banks still think its a good idea to use them because people like Google downplay the true security risk on devices because it makes them more money and fuels their greed since they dont care if customers get hacked. They literally make more money off the profits than the cost of lawsuits. Were you affected by the JP Morgan hack that lost 80 million accounts or Blue Cross that lost 40 million? Banks are gambling with our personal information on a game that always loses.