I have a pretty direct approach to this. I am not a designer per se but I end up doing a lot of design on the sites I work on by default.
I approach this from a slightly different angle. To me there are about 5-10 layouts being used on websites at any given time. Sites tend to mix and match these layouts when they stack sections, but really there are 5-10 of them and they change every few years as web users accept new norms (the hamburger menu, for instance).
So to me - this is just a product page. There is one on most sites. And most have a hero space, alternating text/image sections to lay out features, then 1-3 colorful CTA sections beneath them. And logo gardens. So many logo gardens on product pages.
Some examples:
So given these couple examples - I know there's usually a hero, 2-4 alternating text / image sections, then some extra numbers and facts, and ideally some shots of the actual product.
After that it's just a question of applying the site's look and feel to the layout and maybe inventing a header style and some transition animations to load in the sections, if that's part of how the site I am working on functions.
So basically - I look at examples from big companies that spend a lot of money on their websites, then I copy the approach and use my own styles and UX/UI elements. I know it's not as original as some of the approaches here, but most of this work, to me, is just fitting a pre-existing solution to the right problem. I occasionally ideate a variation on a known control of style pattern, but for the most part these are standard elements all designers use to create a common vocabulary for web users. So to mimic those norms is a must, right?