What is Reddit's opinion of
Qwant Lite?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
33 reviews of this app found across Reddit:
Il y en a aussi pour Qwant, ça s'appelle les "qwicks", voilà une liste.
Ce qui m'embête avec Qwant c'est que les résultats sont des liens de type https://lite.qwant.com/redirect/[ID]/https%3A%2F%2Ffr.reddit.com?position=[N° du résultat]&query=[mots clefs]. Je ne veux pas qu'un moteur de recherche sache sur quels liens je clique, ni qu'il ait l'opportunité de transmettre cette info au site que je visite. Startpage et Duckduckgo ne font pas ça.
It's coming to you sooner than you think!!!
Westminster, of all places! I think that's deliberate.
This has the potential to be the Nuremberg Trials of our time.
People should stop calling it a night market, or those fucking assholes of residents' association are gonna call the police to report on all the restaurants until they're all closed.
That said, good to see there are still some restaurants in that area. It was so much better 10 years ago, though :( There was a delicious 刀削麵 place that merged with another restaurant a few years later. Unfortunately, last time I went there it was gone.
Google “The Origin of the World ” (L'Origine du monde). It's a mid/late 19th century painting by Gustave Courbet, and the most famous vulva in art, I'd say.
And it gets reposted every three or four weeks. ;)
Tu peux utiliser Qwant lite si tu n'aimes pas l'affichage systématique de l'actualité/réseau social.
La différence ? La façon de présenter les résultats.
Je sais pas.
- Je trouve les résultats bien plus pertinents sur Qwant que sur DuckDuckGo.
- Tu as essayé Qwant lite ? C'est les mêmes résultats mais avec une présentation plus prochet de celle google.
Hi !
It's so wierd that so much people seems to have loading issues with Qwant cause I have none. I tried on ungoogled Chromium, Vivaldi and Firefox (both desktop and mobile with FF) on cabled internet and wifi and still have no problems.
I will try to communicate this issueto the Qwant team on their official Telegram group (ps: I am not a Qwant's staff member).
Meanwhile, have you tried lite.qwant.com ? It is a javascriptless version of the search engine. Maybe it will be better.
Well DuckDuckGo say they don't track so if they're truthful about that.... then they get their search from bing so they're still censored and redacted, just less so and less ham-handedly than google.
I have found Quant provides me with the search results the previous three refuses to cough up.....
https://yandex.com/ also tends to provide results that Goolag, Bing and Duck won't...
There's also a https://lite.qwant.com/ face.
Not exactly sure what selecting the search region does, but I'm quite disappointed with the cold war era aggregation of countries. ^(Yeah my flair checks out.)
This also doesn't look so nice.
Par défaut, qwant recherche dans tout, et sort des images en premier. Quand on cherche, par exemple "python colander", tu vas avoir une image de passoire alors que c'est pas ce que tu cherches.
Perso, je vois pas l'intérêt de chercher des images quand tu l'as pas demandé.
Apparement https://lite.qwant.com est moins bête, ou intélligent question de point de vu...
You could dual boot with linux for general use and windows for gaming.
Just use windows defender it's as good as other anti-viruses at this point.
Try Freetube to watch utube vids, best with a VPN though.
Try Qwant for search engine, believe it's google results but more private.
I think its pretty good - the search results seem to be up there (at least for the stuff I use). Only thing I don't like about it is the slightly bloated homepage - would prefer minimal like Startpage or lite.qwant.com
Its one of many I use BTW!
The SPLC also has a pdf made by the Klanwatch Project called the "Ku Klux Klan: A History of Racism and Violence" that gives a good overview I think, it's about 50 pages and serves as a good starting point.
I was talking about China, you can search "january 22" but not "january 20" ? Look at the dates, 20 January 2020 : https://duckduckgo.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&ia=web https://lite.qwant.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&t=web
You think that WHO doesn't need time to review China's claims before making the announcement ? Oh right, China controls WHO so they have to make announcement the same day ? And that's why WHO disobeyed China one day later ? Fucking logic !
And of course the one who created the fake news would say that China told WHO to not announce it before WHO's announcement, what's the point of saying China tried to shut the mouth of WHO after WHO's announcement ? Not everybody is as illogic as you but you both made the same stupid mistake by forgetting that there was an official announcement from China before WHO's.
So your stupid logic is : 01/20 : China confirms human-to-human transmission to the world 01/21 : China which "controls" WHO tell them to not not announce human-to-human transmission 01/22 : WHO "controlled" by China disobeys
Use your brain before stalking someone to copy/paste the same stupid message.
Edit : Wow on half of the sub where you spammed replies to me, there is a 10 minute cooldown after the previous comment even if it was posted on another sub, you seem very obsessed by me for wasting so much time on me. Well I am going to stop here as I don't have that much time to waste unlike you, cya next time.
I was talking about China, you can search "january 22" but not "january 20" ? Look at the dates, 20 January 2020 : https://duckduckgo.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&ia=web https://lite.qwant.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&t=web
You think that WHO doesn't need time to review China's claims before making the announcement ? Oh right, China controls WHO so they have to make announcement the same day ? And that's why WHO disobeyed China one day later ? Fucking logic !
And of course the one who created the fake news would say that China told WHO to not announce it before WHO's announcement, what's the point of saying China tried to shut the mouth of WHO after WHO's announcement ? Not everybody is as illogic as you but you both made the same stupid mistake by forgetting that there was an official announcement from China before WHO's.
So your stupid logic is : 01/20 : China confirms human-to-human transmission to the world 01/21 : China which "controls" WHO tell them to not not announce human-to-human transmission 01/22 : WHO "controlled" by China disobeys
Use your brain before stalking someone to copy/paste the same stupid message.
I was talking about China, you can search "january 22" but not "january 20" ? Look at the dates, 20 January 2020 : https://duckduckgo.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&ia=web https://lite.qwant.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&t=web
You think that WHO doesn't need time to review China's claims before making the announcement ? Oh right, China controls WHO so they have to make announcement the same day ? And that's why WHO disobeyed China one day later ? Fucking logic !
And of course the one who created the fake news would say that China told WHO to not announce it before WHO's announcement, what's the point of saying China tried to shut the mouth of WHO after WHO's announcement ? Not everybody is as illogic as you but you both made the same stupid mistake by forgetting that there was an official announcement from China before WHO's.
So your stupid logic is : 01/20 : China confirms human-to-human transmission to the world 01/21 : China which "controls" WHO tell them to not not announce human-to-human transmission 01/22 : WHO "controlled" by China disobeys
Use your brain before stalking someone to copy/paste the same stupid message.
I was talking about China, you can search "january 22" but not "january 20" ? Look at the dates, 20 January 2020 : https://duckduckgo.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&ia=web https://lite.qwant.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&t=web
You think that WHO doesn't need time to review China's claims before making the announcement ? Oh right, China controls WHO so they have to make announcement the same day ? And that's why WHO disobeyed China one day later ? Fucking logic !
And of course the one who created the fake news would say that China told WHO to not announce it before WHO's announcement, what's the point of saying China tried to shut the mouth of WHO after WHO's announcement ? Not everybody is as illogic as you but you both made the same stupid mistake by forgetting that there was an official announcement from China before WHO's.
So your stupid logic is : 01/20 : China confirms human-to-human transmission to the world 01/21 : China which "controls" WHO tell them to not not announce human-to-human transmission 01/22 : WHO "controlled" by China disobeys
Use your brain before stalking someone to copy/paste the same stupid message.
I was talking about China, you can search "january 22" but not "january 20" ? Look at the dates, 20 January 2020 : https://duckduckgo.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&ia=web https://lite.qwant.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&t=web
You think that WHO doesn't need time to review China's claims before making the announcement ? Oh right, China controls WHO so they have to make announcement the same day ? And that's why WHO disobeyed China one day later ? Fucking logic !
And of course the one who created the fake news would say that China told WHO to not announce it before WHO's announcement, what's the point of saying China tried to shut the mouth of WHO after WHO's announcement ? Not everybody is as illogic as you but you both made the same stupid mistake by forgetting that there was an official announcement from China before WHO's.
So your stupid logic is : 01/20 : China confirms human-to-human transmission to the world 01/21 : China which "controls" WHO tell them to not not announce human-to-human transmission 01/22 : WHO "controlled" by China disobeys
Use your brain before stalking someone to copy/paste the same stupid message.
I was talking about China, you can search "january 22" but not "january 20" ? Look at the dates, 20 January 2020 : https://duckduckgo.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&ia=web https://lite.qwant.com/?q=China+confirms+human-to-human+transmission+jan+january+20&t=web
You think that WHO doesn't need time to review China's claims before making the announcement ? Oh right, China controls WHO so they have to make announcement the same day ? And that's why WHO disobeyed China one day later ? Fucking logic !
And of course the one who created the fake news would say that China told WHO to not announce it before WHO's announcement, what's the point of saying China tried to shut the mouth of WHO after WHO's announcement ? Not everybody is as illogic as you but you both made the same stupid mistake by forgetting that there was an official announcement from China before WHO's.
So your stupid logic is : 01/20 : China confirms human-to-human transmission to the world 01/21 : China which "controls" WHO tell them to not not announce human-to-human transmission 01/22 : WHO "controlled" by China disobeys
Use your brain before stalking someone to copy/paste the same stupid message.
I just tried https://lite.qwant.com/?q=qwant&t=web on Google Chrome as well, and it does not return any results. I think it may be an issue with lite Qwant, and not specific to Brave.
Deactivate what? I also use Brave, I just set up the search engine in the settings.
I use Qwant, but if you want you can manually add in the settings. If you don't have in the list, just add yourself by using:
https://lite.qwant.com/?q=%s&client=opensearch
Try also Qwant, I've found that their search engine give results closer to Google search, they claim to not keep any data, not track stuff and if you make a Qwant account to manage bookmarks or advanced search filters they will not sell any of the data you store at any time.
I had to go back to Google from DDG because their results were just way too random, Qwant saved me from Google and I quite like it.
I'm not sure about Qwant.
- I went to lite.qwant.com (aka no-JS mode) and every link was in this format:
https://lite.qwant.com/redirect/kJtlFt0l%2ByLN%2Ba7zWhhqatHOQ0T8A%2Bh5hDDyXfRH9pU%3D/https%3A%2F%2F**[THE-FINAL-URL]**?position=10&query=**[THE-QUERY]**&t=web&l=en
- I went to www.qwant.com (aka with-JS mode), every link was like this:
<a href="[THE-FINAL-URL]" rel="noopener" target="_blank" onmousedown="WebColumnComponent.logClick(this, Event, {AjaxRoute: 'url', position: '1', t: 'default', domain: 'web', url: '[THE-FINAL-URL-AGAIN]', type: 'serp' })" onclick="LinkHelper.clickHandler(this, Event)" onmouseup="LinkHelper.mouseUpHandler(this, Event)" class="result--web--link">
Are you sure they are not tracking? That looks like tracking to me.
Adblockers and noScript.
Stop using Goolag, that thing stopped being useful the moment they figured out they could influence their users purchasing and other decisions by tailoring search results...The same holds true for bing to a slightly lesser and less overt/retarded degree.
I use https://lite.qwant.com https://yandex.com/ or https://www.ixquick.eu/
When I want search results that aren't paid, tailored and censored to death and actually want all the results rather than the ones they want to give me...
A ceux qui te répondront "oui mais il y a une version légère", si elle existe, elle n'est pas assez mise en valeur, il faut scroller sur l'interface classique pour la trouver (dernier lien en bas à droite), pas mal rebutant pour celui qui n'est pas habitué.
Car au-delà de la puissance et la réputation de Google, il y a aussi une interface sobre et bien pensée, ce qu'à repris DDG. Je veux bien qu'on vive à l'heure des réseaux sociaux et compagnie mais cette lourdeur dès la page d'accueil ne fait vraiment pas envie.
J'avais lu que Qwant utilisait Bing pour des recherches secondaires qu'ils avaientddu mal à indexer (genre les images) et pour la pub.
Et si tu trouves l'interface classique trop lourde (ce qui est le cas), il y une version Qwant lite.
It is good.. though when I found out it runs on BING search I went looking elsewhere and found DuckDuckGo.. and then finally qwant.. hate to say I still go to g00gle for certain topics that I know I can find only there immediately.
Everything is good there.
No matter what I do, after about two searches, I start getting that error page. Turning off extensions doesn't affect behavior either.
btw, https://lite.qwant.com works just fine.
I've been using it for the past 4 or so months, very happy with it. I've always hated duckduckgo, far too often I would always run into terrible search results even for what I thought would be pretty obvious things, but with Qwant I've not had any issues like that. I'd definitely recommend it.
See also Qwant lite in case you don't like the trending news data on the regular page.
How about this then?
Still think it's preposterous? Having trouble accepting facts that threaten your beliefs?
...and if you don't, you gain nothing from it being OSS, because you can't verify what software the server is actually running. And even if it's running only open source software, that doesn't impede the server operator from collecting your data and selling it to the best bidder. Open Source has really very little to do with privacy.
Regarding qwant: There is a less bloated version at https://lite.qwant.com, you might want to try that. I find the search results less convincing than Google's (or those of Startpage, for that matter), but your mileage may vary.