What is Reddit's opinion of SlickPic?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

1x is a cool site. a lot of quality photography but i believe they run on an approval system

i just found out about slickpic which is apparently trying to compete with flickr (they have tags, comments, likes) their gallery is pretty "slick" as well

they offer no limit on uploading but do restrict size (i believe its 1600 wide)

check out my gallery here to see how it works

This isn't really fair. Just because that is GTA Vs development schedule doesnt mean it would take 12x as long to develop a game with a map 12x the size.

Just Cause 2 had a shorter development schedule and a significantly larger map than gta v. Sure the open world isn't as good, but that is what size costs.

http://www.slickpic.com/photo/share/TZGMTUwwUNMNNy/800/p/117859.jpg

But yeah thise whole idea is impossible anyway, even if you had people willing to do it for free for years, you cant make a star wars game without getting Disney on board and that wont happen.

Hmmm... change from "owner view" to "public view"? I don't know... sorry! I will try imgur over the weekend.

http://www.slickpic.com/share/N1wzNDDMMODNYA/albums/KetoJourney/photo?view&viewer#11550288

I understand the whole is vs. non is thing, I'm curious about the mark I vs mark II of the 70-200 f2.8L is. They both have image stabilization. From what I read and hear, the is versions of the lens are better than the non-is versions. Have you used both?

edit: I rented the mark II a few weeks ago, here are some examples of what I am doing with it: http://www.slickpic.com/u/GHoltphotos/MensSoccer1711/photo#88493

http://www.slickpic.com/u/GHoltphotos/MensSoccer11311/photo#109753

http://www.slickpic.com/u/GHoltphotos/MensBasketball11411/photo#115472

will the mark I compare?