>I understand a common initial reservation about these things, but as I explained later, we already place a ton of restrictions around every religion through basic laws. Religions can't do illegal things. One more law maybe making the church Scientology having to alter it's approach doesn't seem like a big deal to me at all.
You have to remember where I come from, I don't like all these laws in place. I don't like morality laws set in place by one group of people to control other people. Things like the war on drugs needs to end. These morality laws don't help people, they long cause more harm. So the argument of a few more laws won't hurt anyone isn't a good argument for me, it kinda misses the point. I'm trying to avoid more authoritarianism and move towards libertarianism.
>Religions can't do illegal things.
Religions also protect against things they deem illegal. And wealth redistribution within a church is an attack upon their rights to privacy.
>Here in America freelancing wasn't common until fairly recently.
Freelancing isn't a new concept. It's been around for thousands of years. It's the basis of exchange of labor or goods without government involvement.
https://www.truelancer.com/blog/history-of-freelancing/
>Even if we don't though, it's kind of splitting hairs.
Yes we are lol.
>The point is freelancing would still be possible in socialism.
I'm just not sure. If I build a company from the ground up and it becomes worth millions, at what point am I no longer protected by those who want to say that they deserve a point of my business? There's no fine line and it would end up being determined by the state and not the individual parties. If I paid you fifty bucks to fix my website, why is it if I become success, you get to retroactively acquire a piece of my company?
Make your Own Development Agency and look for Projects on various Freelance Marketplace like <strong>Truelancer</strong>, <strong>Upwork</strong>, <strong>Freelancer</strong> etc.