Oprah is stating not only that she has power to her name as it is, but also her production company, Harpo Productions, has power as well. “Harpo” is “Oprah” spelled backwards, hence the name. Source
As with many of their battles, the more I listen to it the more I like it. I always go look up the meanings right after my first listen and I am consistently amazed at their incredible talent for puns, layered meanings, references, etc. I was listening to this one in the car today and I finally really got the "Disneyland-lord of your intellectual property" line and I thought WOW. And I didn't get the MIC/KEY part that the words mic and key were both featured in each line until I read the meanings. Hot damn.
I say give each battles several listens and definitely check out the meanings at this site: http://genius.com/artists/Nice-peter-and-epiclloyd
I just read another lyric reference that I didn't get before (Nietzsche: call me übermensch cause I'm so driven - didn't even think of uber the driving service). Insane. I appreciate their talent so much.
>Nice Peter is implying that Chuck Norris' music skills are bad. Also, Lloyd played Chuck Norris in the third Epic Rap Battle of History and opened up his final verse with the line “I am Chuck Fucking Norris”. Peter is mocking Lloyd’s talent with Lloyd line and adding on the fact that Chuck Norris has no musical background.
They get most of their music from Hollywood Legend Productions.
Then, Nice Peter and Jose "Choco" Reynoso master and rework it.
By propaganda, I mean pretty much portraying a desired outcome from bias (more or less). Having Jefferson straight-up cower out and surrender just to lose even more was basically that. And yes, there actually was something he could've done in addition, so how about a few things they could've done to fix this issue:
diamond in the dirt by allrounda productions links: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_songInfo.cfm?bandID=896439&songID=12134590
https://soundcloud.com/allrounda/instrumental-diamond-in-the-dirt-beat-by-allrounda
Funny thing is that they're not all that different... Both saw the laborer as the source of productivity. That's what Smith was referring to as being "The Wealth of Nations."
I'm still trying to figure out how that message got co-opted into "caveat emptor."