What are /r/mutualism's favorite Products & Services?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

> This is all done in the name of Adam Smith. Yet based on The Wealth of Nations, it should be clear that he would have despaired at what has been done in his name and would have been in conflict with the right-wing think tank that has the gall to append "Institute" to his name.

Fucking finally.

> when people still need materials to print.

corn filaments. Sometimes cheaper than ABS, too. All you need access to is a corn husk.

And a $38k one of these :

http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/pa-nylon-trimmer-line-extruder_60325028638.html?spm=a2700.7724857.29.129.eYhTo5

so it's not completely out of the question for a common-pool resource to donate corn and $38k to generate all of the plastic needs of a small hospital.

It also means that you don't have to transport the unsellable (for eating) corn.

My college degree had its token "Engineering Ethics" course, which basically touched on how to make designs safe, accountable, and not intentionally harming other humans.

It required this book, I'm now re-reading.

Can't give you much in specifics as I'm still reading my AnCom theory, but I know Pierre-Joseph Proudhon is generally considered the founder of Mutualism, so I'd start with him if you're looking for a Mutualist equivalent of the bread book.

I'd expect the anarchist library to have him.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/special/index

Could you go in bit more depth about? (I'm asking for your critique of "vernacular law", not state law). I was under the impression that Proudhon wanted some kind of non-statist constitutionalism.

What do you think of what this article has to say about Proudhon and "social law"?

Some other people (besides Bollier and Weston) like Ugo Mattei and Capra in their book <em>The Ecology of Law</em> have also tried to reconceptualize law and rescue it from liberalism.

I'm pretty sure those who talk about "governance", differentiate governance from "government", governance in their mind being something non-coercive, I also think that Kropotkin makes a similar distinction 'between "state" and "government") in The State: Its Historic Role.

Since you seem to your anarchism, do you have something to say about the theory and critique of hierarchy that David Graeber develops in his book Possibilities: Essays on Hierarchy, Rebellion, and Desire?