I found plenty of photos of this, and we learned in school here in Norway that the stones were found laying down and raised like they thought they used to stand. There even used to be a road cutting straight through it! The carbon dating was obviously not done on the stones themseles, they're ancient. You can only carbon date for example volcanic and man-made stone. What was dated were some antler picks that were used to dig. So it's very possible it's much older, and maybe even stood somewhere else??
I think raising the stones was a great business opportunity. If there's a conspiracy, it's to keep the repairs forgotten.
Part of the Sailsbury Plains are still military grounds.
Here's the image search I made, https://www.ecosia.org/images?q=stonehenge+restoration+photos
The geological history of this area can be found here, along with more interesting pictures. If you've visited this area, you'll be familiar with the number of huge stones that are perfectly counterbalanced. Limestone is a big feature around this area, and some of the rock formations look more like intelligent design than sheer coincidence. Interested to hear anyones thoughts..
Edit: there's lots more to be found in Yorkshire too, check out these pics of Brimham Rocks
amazingly enough there is another woman around this period who reincarnated with memories of being an egyptian priestess. highly recommend this book.
https://www.amazon.com/Elisabeth-Haich-Initiation-21-00/dp/B00HTK0964
I can imagine them having been planted there in modern times, none the wiser. Based on an idea, and only an idea, depicted in art from the 16th century as such: http://www.openculture.com/2018/03/an-artist-visits-stonehenge-in-1573-and-paints-a-charming-watercolor-painting-of-the-ancient-ruins-1570.html
See the "Capriccio" art movement in the 16th century and beyond: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capriccio_(art)
> In painting, a capriccio [...] means an architectural fantasy, placing together buildings, archaeological ruins and other architectural elements in fictional and often fantastical combinations.
https://weather.com/science/weather-explainers/news/saharan-africa-dust-reaches-texas-july-2017
Tbh it may very well be unprecedented amounts documented in the regions described, but this is something we have only recently been able to accurately track, so the data pool is limited. The variances seen in the Saharan dust deposition have a number of factors which are all affected by changing global weather patterns like rainfall in the Sahara, shifting winds from changing currents caused by glacial ice melt, etc. Theres too many factors and not enough data to accurately correlate anything just yet, but you see the patterns at hand and you can draw your own conclusions.
To me this seems fairly normal, or if anything, just another factor to monitor in the ongoing climate change phenomenon
>the "h" in "herb" is silent)
Depending on geography, you are right and wrong.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/herb?q=herb&a=british
Context is Kansas City aka Gully Town.
I'm not daring "anyone else to debate" but that certainly is a passionate strawman. If you were honest, you'd be more skeptical of your own belief system. If you had empathy, you'd try to understand why people believe a theory.
Edit: More photos