I've not checked since reading, but as a customer of etoro I have checked before, and I'm pretty sure you're insured up to £1M. Will try to confirm
Edit: Up to £1M excluding crypt0
TDA was acquired by Schwab in 2020. Schwab carries additional coverage via Lloyds of London which provides protection of securities and cash up to an aggregate of $600 million, and is limited to a combined return to any customer from a Trustee, SIPC, and London insurers of $150 million, including cash of up to $1,150,000.
Source: https://www.schwab.com/legal/sipc-account-protection
Finding this list is harder than a simple google query unfortunately 🧐
This is the first complete list of trading restrictions I could find 💎👌:
Here is a quick copy paste:
AAL
AMC
BB
BBBY
CTRM
EXPR
GME
KOSS
NAKD
NOK
SNDL
TR
TRVG
See you on the moon 🦍🦍🦍🚀🚀🚀🚀
Interesting. Pedro Paulo, the "CEO" is standing in front of a wall that says "Gatewit."
Check this out: https://www.trustpilot.com/users/5e4c297d7168c0433d4e8cdd
This is the only person that has given positive reviews to Fintech. They have also given a positive review to Gatewit. The Gatewit website is no longer active and I can't pull up a version from the WayBack Machine.
Adding it to the OP - thanks!
Not according to the etoro website:
“CFD trading is a method of trading in which an individual engages in a contract with a CFD broker, rather than purchasing the underlying asset directly.. CFD is short for “Contract for Difference”
It’s from webflow. It’s used as standard code for this type of scroll animation. If you go through well designed websites, you’ll find webflow is extremely popular.
Dude the thing is: if you infested in eTORO for instance, you are fukd.
Go check out their terms and conditions and then we'll talk again.
If people refer to these kinds of shit companies (I'd even avoid the word "broker"), it is no FUD at all:
There's no check. There's been situations in the past where all of the outstanding shares where bought back, not trading, yet somehow the exchanges where still trading millions of shares.
This example in more are in this book: https://www.amazon.com/Naked-Short-Greedy-Streets-Failure/dp/1910151343
from https://www.etoro.com/customer-service/terms-conditions/ Part 1 4.2.d states:
you will generally not be able to transfer products into your eToro account, out of your eToro
account or to a third party at any time. However, we reserve the right to permit and support
this functionality at our discretion, including, for example, the ability for you to transfer certain
products between your eToro account and electronic wallets operate by an eToro Europe affiliate;
So, there's no need to chance the complete business model...They just need to act at their (better-to-avoid-apes'-fury) discretion to do so.
I believe your maths/understanding is wrong.
Etoro has around 20M users as of 8th March 2021... going right now to their Etoro GME page you can see it says 5.78% of Etoro investors have GME.
709,000 shares voted and that was 63% of eligible SHARES, then 100% is:
Using simple logic, we can safely assume the AVERAGE shares can easily be 5 (random number):
This difference of 4.7M shares (can be more) means there is a large amount of shares NOT eligible to vote and therefore being lent out.
GME cheat code in their Twitter bio is in the movie Wreck it Ralph....that movie gross 741mil....also, yesterday this toy had 741 reviews. Today it has 742. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07FHBBMMG/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_glt_fabc_0W57MPRVES0G7M2W1TMV
I am thinking odd and even mean something. Like on or off...or up and down. Maybe tied to the stocks?
He most definitly did.
There is a whole book about it: "The Quants: How a New Breed of Math Whizzes Conquered Wall Street and Nearly Destroyed It"
​
Wiki Synopsis: "It focuses on, among other things, the 2007 subprime mortgage crisis and how it helped trigger a sudden and massive unwinding of complex, highly leveraged quantitative strategies. The book also delves into critical short-comings of many quantitative strategies, such as their tendency to lead to crowded trades and their underestimation of the likelihood of chaotic, volatile moves in the markets."