What are
/r/Geocentrism's
favorite Products & Services?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
The most popular Products mentioned in /r/Geocentrism:
The most popular Services mentioned in /r/Geocentrism:
The most popular reviews in /r/Geocentrism:
What did you use to make this? Because physically it makes no sense. What are the bands that appear to somehow span across the Earth-centered vortex unperturbed? Why isn't the Earth at all affected by the Sun-centered vortex that seems to cover the Earth (seeing as it is apparently strong enough to affect the planet orbiting the Sun at a distance greater than that between the Sun and the Earth)? If you want a real proper treatment of your 2-vortex model, I would recomend using some sort of fluid dynamics simulation software - you can find a bunch of free ones here, or I also think COMSOL might have a free trial version (not positive on that one though), which would be good cause this is the software actual scientists and engineers use.
What did you use to make this? Because physically it makes no sense. What are the bands that appear to somehow span across the Earth-centered vortex unperturbed? Why isn't the Earth at all affected by the Sun-centered vortex that seems to cover the Earth (seeing as it is apparently strong enough to affect the planet orbiting the Sun at a distance greater than that between the Sun and the Earth)? If you want a real proper treatment of your 2-vortex model, I would recomend using some sort of fluid dynamics simulation software - you can find a bunch of free ones here, or I also think COMSOL might have a free trial version (not positive on that one though), which would be good cause this is the software actual scientists and engineers use.
The Equatorial region is Jupiter's "Belt of Calms"... Other Worlds than Ours, page 148.
You don't have to agree, reality is doing just fine without you :)
> Sungensis's explanation for stellar parallax doesn't work.
Again, Sugenis has an explanation for that. It's not nice of you to jump to conclusions and keep ignoring the concepts. Again, all the geometry is exactly the same as the modern Copernican model. There is no possible geometrically based argument against the neo-tychonic model. The only change geometrically is the frame of reference (perspective).
The only arguments against neo-tychonic Geocentrism is only about how forces could sustain such things.
> Why is it that the Earth is arbitrarily chosen to be still? Why can all other objects move, but not the Earth?
Because God designed it that way. The Universe is like a spinning top. A spinning top doesn't have to have the heaviest mass in the center, agreed ?
> The outer planets and celestial bodies outside the Solar System must move at very high speeds to be able to orbit the Earth once a day. If you do the math, you'll find that the Gravitational Force required to move objects at this speed would require the Earth to be millions of times more massive than it actually is.
Again, you are just showing that you haven't read the materials. Why don't you do read it ?
> Thank you for the discussion and being so patient. Let's just agree to disagree on this.
Thanks, but I think you have some reading to do. I'm sorry that I can't be your answer-bot for everything. No offense, but you'll have to do your own homework.
I recommend starting with "Geocentrism 101 - Sixth Edition - An Introduction into the Science of Geocentric Cosmology" "Recommended for High School, College and Adult Education"
https://www.amazon.com/Geocentrism-101-Introduction-Geocentric-Cosmology/dp/1939856221
This experiment is discussed at length in the book geocentricity, relativity and the big bang. There are many issues issues with the experiment. Look it up yourself if you really care (which you don't).