>Not to start an argument 2 months afterwards, but I understand the basics of Relativity - at least as much as I could without relearning Calc II and Differential Equations (all before they allowed advanced calculators in the room / tests.....ahh...memories)...
So like.. Zero..?
>There are issues with it though. In fact, a recent professional article suggests it may be incorrect on the "smallest" of levels, not observable on our size scale.
You probably didn't understand what you read.
>Physicists have also not been able to reconcile Relatively and Quantum Mechanics - all of which might in fact suggest that we are simply missing something when trying to understand how it all "fits together".
Special relativity and quantum theory are fully compatible. It's difficult to do general relativistic quantum theory but possible to calculate quantum corrections to GR
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Quantum_gravity_as_a_low_energy_effective_field_theory
You're probably not aware of that.
It's also of course totally laughable to hide behind these things as if they give the possibility that your nonsense could be correct.
all of which might in fact suggest that ~~we~~you are simply missing something
>As far as the clock slowing down based on a maximum energy output...well I need to add more detail to that one. But simply based on the WIMPS theory, I could "see" how something moving through space, even on board a rocket / International Space Station / etc. may require some small type of energy consumption to do so.
..... wat? never mind.