https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/20/magazine/how-donald-trump-picked-his-running-mate.html?_r=0

>When Kasich’s adviser asked how this would be the case, Donald Jr. explained that his father’s vice president would be in charge of domestic and foreign policy.

>Then what, the adviser asked, would Trump be in charge of?

>“Making America great again” was the casual reply.

oh snap.
my sources are daily IT news feeds, sites and /r/'s like /r/sysadmin, and IRL memory (might need a memtest)

here i found one from theRegister that kind of sums up a lot of info. As i can see theRegister have once in 2010 misrepresented the work of a professor, but i see their stuff as light but founded reading. you could check their credibility if you're up for it here is one site for that

His boss was also IN several soft core pornos (and maybe a Russian piss tape).

Sources: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/07/politics/rudy-giuliani-trump-credibility-porn-videos/index.html

https://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/donald-trump-appeared-in-a-2000-playboy-softcore-porn?utm_term=.fobjYVyzdB#.fobjYVyzdB

https://www.amazon.com/Q-Luther-Blissett/dp/0156031965

Especially since it's easy to trace the origin and content of the troll.

You can't really even laugh at this stupidity since it's so sad. A sizable percentage of my fellow citizens are complete idiots. Fox News and Walmart seem to be the height of cognition.

Why are you so sure Michelle 'abused her status'? Did you check to see if the profits benefited a cause close to her heart?

Since Michelle Obama never otherwise 'abused her status' and was an exemplary first lady, I bet this was the case.

Further, you said 'books'. I only found one book on amazon, and that only included Obama as one of two authors because it was a compilation of quotes by her, taken from newspapers etc. and compiled into categories by the other author.

https://www.amazon.com/Michelle-Obama-her-Own-Words/dp/1586487620/ref=la_B004B0TWTK_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1486476617&sr=1-1

Such hyperbole. There's been tons of elections like his.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/18/us/elections/donald-trump-electoral-college-popular-vote.html?_r=0

He barely won. He got immensely lucky in many ways. Clinton "outplayed" herself.

What stupid shit? Like a politicia'ns child shouldn't be given an office, governmental technology, and confidential information? Sorry I forgot to mention the child has zero experience and the only thing they have going for them is a last name.

I'll just leave THIS here.

Install Res. After that mouseover the subreddit name/link and a box will appear with filter at the bottom. Click on that. A confirmation box that the sub is now filtered out will appear in the top right hand of your screen.

The phrase "that's the pot calling the kettle black" springs to mind! https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/pot-calling-the-kettle-black

Or just plain old "people in Whitehouses shouldn't throw stones"

I also want to check this out. I think I may have found it?

She tries to keep covering the news, but she says she has to kind of zone herself out because the mere awareness that the head of state and his party are an existential threat to America may be so personally horrifying that it compromises her ability to do her job.

> If I start thinking about it, then I’m not going to be able to just keep doing my job. I'm being as honest as I can — I try not to think about it. If you’re flying a plane and you think about the fact that if the plane blows up in midair you’re gonna die, do you feel like you can really focus as well? So, I’m not thinking about [the stakes]. This is just my job. This is what we do. Ask me another question.

Also on Fox News, Senior Legal Analyst Napolitano: "Effectively, what Bob Mueller said is: 'We had evidence that he committed a crime, but we couldn't charge him because he's the President... The President can't be indicted, otherwise we would have indicted him.'""

Umberto Eco wrote on the 14 points of Fascism and all of them are easily identifiable with Trumps tactics.

2 The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”

4 Disagreement is treason. “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.”

7 The obsession with a plot. “The followers must feel besieged. The easiest way to solve the plot is the appeal to xenophobia.”

11 Everybody is educated to become a hero. “In Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death.”

http://www.openculture.com/2016/11/umberto-eco-makes-a-list-of-the-14-common-features-of-fascism.html

>You may not have liked all their policies twenty years ago but their policies weren't all lies and crazy conspiracy theories and outright criminal cover-ups.

They've been leaning on conspiracy theories since the Arkansas Project, the Russians just picked up where the GOP left off after 9/11 gave them a new lever to pull:

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas_Project

https://www.texasobserver.org/777-the-arkansas-project-unmasked/amp/

>His tweet appeared to be responding to the thousands of dollars in donations that Linda Bean, who is a granddaughter of the company’s founder, offered to the PAC during his presidential campaign. The donations turned out to be illegal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/linda-bean-ll-bean-boycott.html

Ok and as a result of this L.L. Bean publicly repudiated her.

We had someone this morning trying to post an invite for people to harass L.L. Bean. It was removed.

I also want to check this out. I think I may have found it?

She tries to keep covering the news, but she says she has to kind of zone herself out because the mere awareness that the head of state and his party are an existential threat to America may be so personally horrifying that it compromises her ability to do her job. "I don't have emotions about this. I can't have emotions about this. If I have emotions, I can't do my job. [...] One of the temptations of reporters in this era [...] is to refer back to some arc of history that pre-told what we're seeing now, or is at least familiar, or gives some common frame, but there's no context for this in history."

> If I start thinking about it, then I’m not going to be able to just keep doing my job. I'm being as honest as I can — I try not to think about it. If you’re flying a plane and you think about the fact that if the plane blows up in midair you’re gonna die, do you feel like you can really focus as well? So, I’m not thinking about [the stakes]. This is just my job. This is what we do. Ask me another question.

Impeachment: A Handbook by Charles Black is short (around 80 pages), and extremely readable for the lay person.

In short, not all crimes are impeachable offenses, and not all impeachable offenses are crimes.

You remind me of something.