What are /r/PresidentialRaceMemes' favorite Products & Services?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

Libertarians aren't about liberty: they are about property.

They start with property rights as the natural right, and extrapolate from there. That's how the prominent Libertarian thinker Murray Rothbard arrives at the following batshit insanity:

> Now if a parent may own his child (within the framework of non-aggression and runaway freedom), then he may also transfer that ownership to someone else. He may give the child out for adoption, or he may sell the rights to the child in a voluntary contract. In short, we must face the fact that the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children. Superficially, this sounds monstrous and inhuman. But closer thought will reveal the superior humanism of such a market.

In other words, parents should be able to sell the kids to the highest bidder. This fucking dude read A Modest Proposal and went "Hmm, man's got a point!".

That sheep has too much wool on it. This is us now.

​

And keep your head up, we live in a cruel society that demonizes the poor and down trodden

Hey my good dude!

You don't even need photoshop! Personally I make all my memes with Paint.Net. It's a super straight forward little app that works great for memes and simple editing stuff like this.

If you are looking for more power GIMP is also an option but sorta overkill IMO, but if you are gonna add in text I think it works a schooch better.

Anyways both are free and super easy to learn. Most memes are basically just the crop tool and keeping everything on separate layers.

Good luck!

lol, you couldn't be more wrong.

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/counting-victims-of-the-castro-regime-nearly-11000-to-date/

https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Military_Units_to_Aid_Production.html

What seems to me to be a much more dangerous problem that could cause Trump to beat the democratic nominee in the general election, is if we do not select the strongest candidate now because we are afraid to criticise weaker candidates. There is a large part of the primary-level electorate that thinks Sanders and Warren are as good as interchangeable. That's absolutely wrong. There's a huge difference between them and people should know that.

Having said that, I am also against such criticism being made in an empty, uninformed or vulgar way. That is why I have drawn up the above list in order to conduct that debate in a constructive, substantive manner.

​

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator

Anarchism is not a back to nature ideaology tho? I'm sorry friend what you're saying is simply false.

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/special/index

I'd recommend reading up instead of talking like your personal take is fact. As anarchism isn't we all go back taking shits in the woods lol.

'Don't believe the numbers you see': Johns Hopkins professor says up to 500,000 Americans have coronavirus

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/marty-makary-on-coronavirus-in-the-us-183558545.html

--

Also the official US tested positive number is 2,488 right now.

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

All of this is limited by number of tests, this number is ridiculously incorrect.

It WAS from Scandinavia, as it stands now its in the hands of a Chinese consortium.

I say this as someone that has been using Opera since the early 2000's: stop using it, switch to Vivaldi. One of the original co-founders of Opera started it, and it's as close to old-school Opera we're going to get.

You should read this Best Seller... Even President Trump recomended it-- Reasons to Vote for Democrats: A Comprehensive Guide

Be sure to read the preview pages

this book is very well researched and will answer your question pretty definitively: https://www.amazon.com/Start-War-Bush-Administration-America/dp/0525561048

But the short answer is:

-bipartisan consensus was that Saddam was a bad dude an we'd be better off with him gone, but that wasn't enough for everyone to be convinced of war.

- Senior Bush admin officials' desire to go after Saddam fed CIA's tendencies to exaggerate their intel on WMDs and al qaeda/Saddam ties, which fed the desire to go to war further.

- Colin Powell, the British, and the MSM all getting on board the CIA's narrative helped convince the Dems that the narrative was true.

- Some Dems weren't sure, but in the hyper-patriotic/hyper-militaristic post-9/11 environment, nobody wanted to be seen as weak, so they went along with it.

It is vanishingly unlikely a Dem administration would have proactively went to war in Iraq. On the flip side, if Wolfowitz had a hard-on for going to war against a different country than Iraq, the Dems probably would have gone along with invading it too, didn't really matter, the political calculation was just cowardice - "everyone else seems convinced that we should do this, I'd better go along with it!"

Ah yes, referring to oneself as a hoe is an entirely serious statement of their preferences and not a lighthearted label that is supposed to evoke a mild "hah."

You've run out of this.

That sucks because my Amazon order is already on its way

​

https://www.amazon.com/Dahle-Professional-Guillotine-Self-Sharpening-Engineered/