I;m pretty happy with how they represented the Tiger 1 in game. The Chieftains Hatch has a good write up on the Tiger scene from Fury -https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/chieftain/TCH_Fury_Sherman_Tiger/
Comparing the 100m thick front armour of the Tiger 1 to the sloped armour of the M4 being effectively 90mm.
Yeah I find a article about the is2, eugen is right about the ammo count. I just find it a little annoying in game but im ok with it.
Hello, I'm a bot! The movie you linked is called Mais où est donc passée la 7ème compagnie, here are some Trailers
I just got this laptop (ASUS TUF Gaming F17 Gaming Laptop, 17.3” 144Hz FHD IPS-Type Display, Intel Core i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, 8GB DDR4, 512GB PCIe SSD, RGB Keyboard, Windows 10, Bonfire Black, FX706LI-ES53 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08ZLC661T/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_MPGC7TNK3XT5AD28XNGM) for Christmas and its run on ultra and barely gets hot. Been incredible for me as it’s my first true gaming computer ever
https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/chieftain/chieftains-hatch-tanks-marianas/ the chieftain also has a lot of interesting videos on tanks from his youtube channel. could aproximate the japanese 43rd division by mixing the 2 hungarian divisions to see how it might play. the 4th marine division would ironically play like a panzergrenadier division with 2 amphibious tractor battalions (about 100 lvts each) and a tank battalion (alroxmiately 50 shermans)
5) 57mm Gun, M1 a) APC, M86 will penetrate the sides and rear of the 'Panther' Tank at 1500 yards.
b) Sabot fails to penetrate front glacis slope plate and gun shield at 200 yards. Due to difficulty experienced in obtaining hits no conclusion as to the effectiveness of this ammunition was reached.
Finding 5a is clear. But 5b is a little more complicated. The conclusion indicates that APDS would not penetrate the Panther frontally at minimal range. But the board could not determine the range at which it would penetrate the sides because they quite simply couldn’t hit the target. The conclusion is stated in neutral terms, but represents a growing point of contention. Despite British praises of their sabot rounds, the US Army could not abide by the inaccuracy that they saw with the new British rounds.
https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/chieftain/chieftains-hatch-us-guns-vs-german-armour-part-1/
Isigny tests.
APDS was inaccurate as sabot interactions with the penetrator would tumble it off axis. Uk own accuracy testing paint a horrid picture:
To put more perspective on accuracy of British APDS at that time, I would note that the British Army’s own test results, obtained by two 17pr-armed Sherman Firefly tanks in September of 1944, were no better. These results and comments were published in Warrant Office Reports WO 291/1263 and WO 165/135 dated 22 September:
400 yds APC hit 90.5% APDS hit 56.6%
600 yds APC hit 73.0% APDS hit 34.2%
800 yds APC hit 57.3% APDS hit 21.9%
1000 yds APC hit 45.3% APDS hit 14.9%
1500 yds APC hit 25.4% APDS hit 7.1%
Thanks. I adjusted my setting down and my video card is running much better. Graphics arent quite as crisp but still not bad.
I was looking around for deals. What do you think about this?
If you want to try something on android you should try Pixel Trenches. Its a game about WW1 trench warfare I'm developing. Let me know what you think about it:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pixelroar.pixeltrenches
above is the link to the amazon pre order
hope the launch goes great khan!
I just did a quick amazon search and found my books:
https://www.amazon.com/Battle-Bulge-Failure-Final-Blitzkrieg/dp/2352503825/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8
https://www.amazon.com/Battle-Bulge-Assault-Failure-Blitzkrieg/dp/2352504007/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8
These are the two volumes. I hope they're what you're looking for. The first one goes into the planning and and problems with getting the offensive into motion. I have yet to read volume two yet, but from my skimming it goes into depth on the battle itself. They also have a lot of never before seen photos which is what first drew my eyes to them.