I just posted the android download link. But I'll post it here as well in case that doesn't get seen. And I tried to post this eight minutes ago, but apparently I'm "doing that too much". Well, r/randpaul sub, I'm sorry I annoyed you with my concern over the fate of this country...
You might try http://www.webs.com/ - they've been around for a long time and it's pretty much drag and drop web design.
That said, I'm sick of Trump-spam and would not vote for Trump, even in the General Election, for a variety of reasons. He is not who he claims to be and has changed his position on the issues countless times. I Stand with Rand. :)
I was able to find one in CT today.
There's a 30% off coupon too: http://www.barnesandnoble.com/promos/bn-promo.jsp?cid=3600001
Take the $7.50 you save and add to your next donation to the Rand Paul campaign!
> Nothing highlights the disaster of this government/ corporate partnership like the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which "gave" ISPs $200 Billion to "upgrade" broadband internet in the US
That did not happen. The claim largely comes from someone estimating what ISP profits would have been had they been regulated like telecoms with a regulated rate of return, and comparing that to actual profits, and calling the different a subsidy. Another big chunk of it comes from saying that depreciation should have been accounted for differently.
There's a detailed debunking here.
Hmm phrases, yes the phone records one is popular... also...
Edit: Have some moar.
You aren't suited for the presidency if on core issues you change positions because you just learned about them on the campaign trail. A presidential candidate should have a coherent message and a set of principles before they embark on a campaign. They should be informed of the issues. This was my problem with Ben Carson as well. He said in an interview that he didn't know about key terror groups but that he was a quick learner. Well if you don't even know about key news issues around the world how can you be qualified for presidency? Reagan, bad as he was as he tripled the national debt, increased taxes on net, and armed the terrorists who would attack us on 9/11, at least knew about key issues going on around the world. Donald Trump simply doesn't.
Furthermore, how exactly, would levying new taxes on foreign imports limit government? That increases government bureaucracy! And as far as protectionism goes, I would highly recommend you read Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt(That's not an insult by the way, it's a damn good book).
Moreover, how would Donald Trump find the illegals? Would he forego the 4th amendment by issuing blank warrants and indefinitely detaining them without giving them due process? If not, wouldn't the legal system be so backed up with cases of illegals that nothing would happen? Meanwhile, how would they be shipped out? How would some be allowed back in, as he plans to do? That's going to result in massive bureaucracy, with new rules and regulations with regards to who gets in and out. What happens to the migrant farms and factories where illegals worked for cheap? Won't prices inevitably rise there, harming the labor market and the economy at large?
Id suggest you pick up Rand's book.
In it, he shows how govt that is too big often ends up screwing the little guy. I can tell you from being in business for myself that govt on all levels is too big. I just paid $80 for a piece of paper. Its useless... but hey.. the govt needs it to pay some dumbfck to tell me that I need it.
Have you ever read Titan? It actually goes into this a bit when Standard Oil had to incorporate separately in each state. Pretty interesting stuff and a great book. Also goes into the nature of regulation the oil industry.
I will agree with that. There is a lot of redundancy involved in making multiple companies that service the same thing in each state.
I think we have to either go full socialized single payer or deregulate entirely. This halfway bastardization that we have is pretty horrible.