What is Reddit's opinion of 23 hq?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

I'm going to agree with you. It was probably a one-armed planche. Like this. I've seen it more often in acro gymnastics than in artistic, but every once in a while someone will do it on beam

Edit: on how to do it -I've never done it myself, but the people I know who have done it center their hand under their body bend their arm at a right or less angle and plant their elbow in their side/by the hip. Other than that I believe it is a lot of back strength. Hope this helps somewhat.

The nobility were often larger due to getting plenty of food over generations.

http://www.23hq.com/5473659/5869298_bbfb646d2d86b8abb65294fc23bbf7af_large.jpg

The armour on the left of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster who was around 6' 7". Henry the 8th was around 6' 3" to 6' 4". Obviously there would have been small ones too but they were much better nourished than the peasants.

There's also this one that I think means something is really fucked, because OS X didn't even have a chance to throw up the international grey screen of death.

Pretty sure it is. The Danish church weds gay couples, even though individual pastors may abstain from doing so and will refer to another pastor in that case (also, some vicors don't want to wed divorcees). Again, I don't know how the Danish churches work abroad, but it seems they have a Danish pastor, so you will be welcome in the church, even if the pastor don't want to marry gays in the church.

The Danish church is generally quite liberal compared to American evangelical/Lutheran churches, but there are also many different views among the pastors, some being more liberal and some being more conservative. But I don't think there are any Danish priests in the Danish church who wouldn't welcome gays, their opinions mainly differ in terms of allowing gay wedding ceremonies is church.

This is a picture of my local church (granted, they have one of the more liberal/progressive pastors)

I can do that! Here

And here is some more

I'm on my phone ATM or I'd get carried away :). Mmmm pussy. A fave subject of mine. Mmmm tattoos

I post in different sites depending of the picture.

My main gallery is 23hq because they have not limit in the photo storage/show like flickr does with no 'pro' users. The only restriction for free accounts are 30 uploads per month (except 1st week), I don't upload often anyway.

Other sites I use are deviantart and tumblr.

(sorry my english)

Nice! I love taking photos of landings in that area! It's great how just a little zoom seems to always get the bridge in there too. http://www.23hq.com/Hillson/photo/4497991/original

ERROR: only links to Google Docs and Imgur are allowed (non-shortened links). For your reference, links to Wattpad.com are considered self promotion and Inkitt.com is right out. Post has been removed for having the following link: [http://www.23hq.com]

This is only an error message. The mods don't know about it. Go ahead and resubmit. It wasn't a punishment, rebuke, reprimand, castigation, or objurgation – only an admonitory. And if you can, could you check the thesaurus to get Automod more synonyms? Automod gets bored sometimes...

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/fantasywriters) if you have any questions or concerns.

I find that flash is distracting. I tend to shoot street photography, particularly candids, and it's hard to imagine using it. Still, if I'm missing a tool, I want to learn what I'm missing.

On camera flash is often a 'last resort' for me, and I'm nearly always disappointed by the harshness that it casts on my subjects. I'm often shooting people in sunlight or at night, though, is it just a shade/studio thing?

Now this sounds cool, do you have any examples of exposure effects you can achieve with this technique?

Since, you guaranteed... I rather like these photos I took (though, you're more than welcome to disagree and constructively criticize):

http://www.23hq.com/23666/13558555_cbe479e61822cb62eda59c26b0ce1a8e_large1k.jpg

http://www.23hq.com/23666/13558537_a3cc53ae7e13d3c6dab6b31f50ed35ae_large1k.jpg

>It is the perfect example of artificial selection.

Not perfect, at least not from the taste point of view.

I'm Brazilian and when I saw the "sweet yellow bananas" in the title I thought they meant "banana ouro", literally "golden bananas", the sweetest and tastiest bananas that exist.

It's not easy to find those bananas, even in Brazil there are few supermarkets that have them. And when you find them, they are often too raw, they must be left to ripen on the stalk, they must not be cut too soon or they will never develop that full taste.

But when you find some of those very small bananas that have been raised in the right way, that's the best taste you can get in any fruit I've ever tasted.

Thanks for your reply - it makes me glad to hear you found my post useful.

For the cropping, I had a feeling that was the case. I'd leave it as it is, then. No reason to crop tighter IMHO.

I like your thoughts on the aperture - I often make the mistake of going for too much blur and ending up with the wrong focal point. Reading your comment, I'd say you nailed the "select and hope" on this one :)

I'd love to see your other shots too - I imagine it could quite the series.

I was on Flickr but got a bit fed up with it; having to choose between paying (even though it is a minor amount) and only having your latest 200 pics visible made me abandon Flickr for 23hq.com (a smaller, Danish site with less restrictions).

Unfortunately, I used 23hq as more of a backup-solution, so everything I shot during that time was uploaded, and what I consider the good stuff is buried in all the "meh" shots.