What is Reddit's opinion of
Infogalactic?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
➔ Infogalactic website
By popularity on Reddit, this Service is:
30 reviews of this app found across Reddit:
If it's OK with you I'll just leave InfoGalactic's link here, just in case Wikipedia's Ministry of Truth sanitizes its article.
It appears they want to sub-divide content pages into Fact, Context, and Opinion filters (you can pick which one(s) you want to view at any given time), as well as allow users to rate pages on relativity (left-right political bias), notability, and reliability (accuracy).
For example, if there's a page or subsection with extreme bias, you will be able to create a page on the same topic that is more neutral and anyone with filters set to avoid all fringe articles will only see yours. Similarly, you can add as much slant as you want to the Opinion subcategory, but you can't stick it in the Facts category without being banned, and anybody filtering out Opinions won't see the stuff you added to the article.
The central goal appears to be avoiding edit-warring over the One True Wiki Page That Everyone Sees by allowing for a multiplicity of them. Honestly, as far as core problems with Wikipedia go, I have to agree that the problems associated with edit-warring are way bigger issue than just bias. It is the edit warring of users backed by superusers which is what is creating the bias in the first place.
Personally, I think it's still subject to the same problems, but hopefully to a lesser extent. It's all academic though because they haven't developed any of those features; it's just a wiki fork at the moment, though apparently they want to start development by November.
See the Seven Canons & their site roadmap for details.
There already is, and the way it's trying to approach it, it's trying to completely bypass any sort of "wikipedia BUT CONSERVATIVE!" aspect by eventually having it where you can set your own filters from very liberal to very conservative and get your slant that way.
Check out Infogalactic. It's still a work in progress, but it's already a full mirror of wikipedia, and if Infogalactic doesn't have their own version of it they'll download Wikipedia's version.
Just compare SJW-infested Wikipedia's version of Donald Trump with Infogalactic's Donald Trump
> if they attempt to """legalize""" disarmament and strip speech under the guise of """security""" then 1776 will commence again.
Not 1776, 1793. It will not be as peaceful as the American Revolutionary War. They've seen to that. If we have to fight again for basic freedoms and rights in this country we're going to see blood in the streets and heads rolling to such an extent that it echos through future history with such force we do not again find ourselves in this place any time soon.
The Liberty Tree needs watering. Unfortunately.
Remember one of reddit.com's most famous "Nazis" "European88" turned out to be named "Joshua Goldberg" and he was not only posing as a "White Supreeemacis!" but also a "radical Islamic supporter of ISIS?"
http://infogalactic.com/info/Joshua_Ryne_Goldberg
Joshua Ryne Goldberg (born 1994 or 1995) is an American internet troll, who was arrested by the U.S. government for allegedly distributing information about bomb-making techniques as part of an attempt to incite acts of terrorism on the 14th anniversary of the September 11 attacks.
White supremacist personas
European88 and Reddit
On Reddit, Goldberg made thousands of racist posts as a neo-Nazi and moderated many racist subreddits, including the "r/CoonTown" subreddit.
"Michael Slay"
Goldberg posted on the neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer as "Michael Slay". Upon his arrest, the administrator of the site removed his posts.
...
Remember for YEARS people were complaining about the "anti-semitic racist White people" on reddit - and - AS USUAL - it turned out to be a "false flag."
Anytime on /r/conspiracy I read anyone saying anything about "filthy Jews" or "Khazars" or whatever I pretty much assume it's a Jewish troll. It's a pretty safe assumption.
Wikipedia is run by Democrat National committee paid agents.. And the Democrat Party is run by china. It's third party China censorship..
Wikipedia also deletes any references towards Joe Biden's racism while promoting an entire page of made up examples and debunked claims of "trump racism""
For a long time Wikipedia claimed that Trump called Nazis fine people even though CNN had already admitted to doctoring the footagee
Wikipedia is controlled by the Democrat Party to push propaganda..
And two things need to happen to fix it. Outside of gaining control of Wikipedia by buying it.. we need to get search engines to stop using Wikipedia and start using the more reliable and non-censorship http://infogalactic.com
And more importantly Wikipedia needs to lose its section 230 protections.. Wikipedia never claiming to be a social media Network and should never have gotten section 230 protections. If they publish false information or defamatory information about someone they should be able to be sued for libel. They claim to be an encyclopedia. You can sue an encyclopedia
Israel shares intelligence with the Five Eyes, also with Jordan and Saudi Arabia, has deep trade ties with Europe and China, a thriving tourist line to India (its nearly mandatory for Israelis leaving conscripted service to go let off steam and do drugs in India lol) and military sales as far afield as Colombia, Singapore and Canada.
The era of a beleaguered and outnumbered Israel surrounded by enemies ended in 1972.
> About the only way I see such a site working is through benevolent dictatorship by the right people. The difficulty is in finding such people and keeping everything honest.
That looks to be what they're going for. They've currently got ~40 admins charged with keeping things clean, including "hunt down griefers who are attempting to vandalize, proselytize, or otherwise jeopardize the operations of Infogalactic". Basically, post opinions in a facts page a few times and expect to be warned, suspended and/or banned. The four founding members are responsible for approving requests for admin privileges, which is different from wikipedia's community polling system.
There isn't anything systematic in place to stop the exact same superuser shit from wikipedia taking place, other than the judgment of the founding members in selecting said superusers.
Apparently it's generally called Betteridge's law of headlines, though it's sometimes called "Davis' law" or the "journalistic principle".
Wenns auf Englisch ist: Hier eine Seite erstellen. http://infogalactic.com/ Auf Wikileaks wird das gelöscht, auf Infogalactic nicht. Koordiniert es doch einfach hier, Freiwillige, jeder schnappt sich einen Teil. Einfach loslegen. Andere werden folgen.
Wikipedia is cucked. I'm switching to Infogalatic, same format as Wikipedia but with less lefty bias. Infogalatic places value on truth and facts rather than remaining in the middle.
I don't think reversing our current position is a good idea, but start by looking into the Paris Agreement, which isn't a peace agreement...then look into the Iran Nuclear Deal, which also isn't a peace agreement...
These links ought to get you started in a direction to be able to form your own opinion.
http://infogalactic.com/info/List_of_programs_broadcast_by_the_Arutz_HaYeladim. Here is a list of all the programming on that channel, I looked through all of it looking for key words and found nothing that would be this. Some of the titles are in Hebrew and other languages I’m sure and don’t link to other Wikipedia pages. You would probably be able to recognize the title if you scrolled through all of these.
the moderators of Wikipedia have repeatedly refused to correct articles that push disinformation. It was a big thing about how they claimed that Trump called Nazis fine people and refused to allow anybody to edit it..
the same reason they won't say that Donald Trump jr. Is a victim of debunked left-wing conspiracy against Russiaa
Everyone should use http://infogalactic.com instead
https://infogalactic.com/info/Donald_Trump_Jr.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Trump%E2%80%93russia_conspiracy_theory
the moderators of Wikipedia have repeatedly refused to correct articles that push disinformation. It was a big thing about how they claimed that Trump called Nazis fine people and refused to allow anybody to edit it..
the same reason they won't say that Donald Trump jr. Is a victim of debunked left-wing conspiracy against Russiaa
Everyone should use http://infogalactic.com instead
https://infogalactic.com/info/Donald_Trump_Jr.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Trump%E2%80%93russia_conspiracy_theory
Prove fox isnt reliable
the moderators of Wikipedia have repeatedly refused to correct articles that push disinformation. It was a big thing about how they claimed that Trump called Nazis fine people and refused to allow anybody to edit it..
the same reason they won't say that Donald Trump jr. Is a victim of debunked left-wing conspiracy against Russiaa
Everyone should use http://infogalactic.com instead
https://infogalactic.com/info/Donald_Trump_Jr.
https://infogalactic.com/info/Trump%E2%80%93russia_conspiracy_theory
Not even. Even the most ridiculous left-wing blog is considered 100% truthful while established and reputable right-wing news sites such as national review Fox news The daily wire and others are considered unreliable LOL
they banned using Breitbart as a source but allow Huffington Post. Breitbart is not worse than Huffington Post. Andrew Breitbart literally created Breitbart to be the right-wing Huffington Postt
and the moderators of Wikipedia have repeatedly refused to correct articles that push disinformation. It was a big thing about how they claimed that Trump called Nazis fine people and refused to allow anybody to edit it..
the same reason they won't say that Donald Trump jr. Is a victim of debunked left-wing conspiracy against Russiaa
Everyone should use http://infogalactic.com instead
>Probably a generational thing. Boomers see it as "going the extra mile", GenXers like me see it as wasted effort.
Millennials see it cynically as a warped Morton's Fork: not actually used for the hiring, but its absence is used as an excuse for not hiring.
Wikipedia is Democrat propaganda. The owner of Wikipedia called Trump a cult leader and most of the moderators on Wikipedia are far left agents of the Democrat Party. regularly scrubbing information damaging to the Democrat Party and putting up this information that can be damaging to the Republican party and undoing any edits that anybody might make to improve the accuracy of the information..
there was a whole thing about when they tried to pretend that Trump called Nazis fine people even though CNN admitted to doctoring the footagee.
despite hundreds of people coming in and providing evidence and well-sourced lynx to fix that Wikipedia entry the moderators kept on doing it in order to push disinformation
Wikipedia is not a trustworthy source
a much less biased and open wiki site is http://infogalactic.com
Infogalactic is a project to fork Wikipedia, break out content into different opinion viewpoints and allow you to filter by viewpoint.
It fizzled out without it ever working, but the idea was close to you narrativepedia.
ive edited Wikipedia dozens of times fixing bad stuff like mispelled words and sources etc. especially Dead links
it always gets undone bu the powertripping mods of wiki
now i use http://infogalactic.com
its much better
Wikipedia is edited and moderated by far-left editors. To the point that they actually banned Breitbart as a source but no left-wing sources.
To the point that I tried to add context 2 the page on the deep state (by adding links to various news sources both left right and center that explained the deep state) and didn't actually delete anything and they reverted it. Apparently adding context that goes against the Democrat narrative isn't allowed on Wikipedia. They also propagate the conspiracy theory that Donald Trump praised Nazis. Wikipedia was never a reliable source but it's also a far-left propaganda source.
My suggestion if you're looking for real websites like Wikipedia did are moderated by far-left paid trolls is http://conservapedia.com and infogalactic.com
Wikipedia is edited and moderated by far-left editors. To the point that they actually banned Breitbart as a source but no left-wing sources.
To the point that I tried to add context 2 the page on the deep state (by adding links to various news sources both left right and center that explained the deep state) and didn't actually delete anything and they reverted it. Apparently adding context that goes against the Democrat narrative isn't allowed on Wikipedia. They also propagate the conspiracy theory that Donald Trump praised Nazis. Wikipedia was never a reliable source but it's also a far-left propaganda source.
My suggestion if you're looking for real websites like Wikipedia did are moderated by far-left paid trolls is http://conservapedia.com and infogalactic.com
Wikipedia is edited and moderated by far-left editors. To the point that they actually banned Breitbart as a source but no left-wing sources.
To the point that I tried to add context 2 the page on the deep state (by adding links to various news sources both left right and center that explained the deep state) and didn't actually delete anything and they reverted it. Apparently adding context that goes against the Democrat narrative isn't allowed on Wikipedia. They also propagate the conspiracy theory that Donald Trump praised Nazis. Wikipedia was never a reliable source but it's also a far-left propaganda source.
My suggestion if you're looking for real websites like Wikipedia did are moderated by far-left paid trolls is http://conservapedia.com and infogalactic.com
re: "Why don't we routinely write down the reasoning behind our programs in a formal way and have computers check it?"
Well, let me introduce you to SPARK, which does just that.
Maybe, just maybe we should stop electing (and reelecting) old fuckers who were in college in the 70's.
Like start electing people under 50 for a change, instead of Loius Ghomert, McConnel and Grandpa fucking Simpson (looking at you, Sam Johnson
Edited to add THIS LIST
88 of our sitting Senators are OVER 50 ! ! !
I wouldn't trust my mom to make laws on Net Neutrality because she doesn't even understand the internet. Hell, before she died, she barely even understood Facebook, and that's damn near idiot proof!
Please, PLEASE start running younger people for office. Otherwise we're fucking doomed.
DOOOOOOOOOOMED ! ! ! !1
>It would be really cool if they actually do go to the future and stay there...see the impacts of reality TV on the zookeepers, see how the ship dome people end up. Maybe see if Bortus's species has allowed women since then.
Isn't it a bit early to pull a SeaQuest DSV?
If what you are saying is true, and black women actually are running BLM, I guaran-freakin'-T you they'd take Ezekiel Elliott's words as the God's honest truth over the white women who say "believe the (white) women."
Now what may surprise many MGTOW (but not the men of IBMOR, who know this history well) is many activist women in the black power movement believed that feminism is a racist ideology of white supremacy. These women actually created their own women's movement just so that they wouldn't be associated with feminism.
Now this was during the 1970s, which was the high water mark for feminist influence. And while feminists today claim that they are 'intersectional', and that those old concerns of black women are no longer relevant, I don't see much 'intersectionalism' except when it comes to feminist PR and promotion.
Here is an InfoGalactic page with hard numbers and links to source articles for when libtards try to debunk that the pedophile busts are occurring. Please spread this link far and wide on social media so others can see that President Trump is anti-pedo.
While I have your attention, donations to InfoGalactic are always appreciated
*I am in no way affiliated with them other than being a fan.
The answer is on its front page
Also, Canons two and seven are there to combat a "Wikipedia effect", I think.
Of course, nothing is written in stone, so the site would have to adapt as novel attempts at co-opting it emerge.