What are
/r/uncensorednews'
favorite Products & Services?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
The most popular Products mentioned in /r/uncensorednews:
The most popular Services mentioned in /r/uncensorednews:
Merriam-Webster
The Guardian
WikiLeaks
Hooktube
PRISM Break
NPR News
Alexa
Pastebin.com
BitChute
Academia.edu
ResearchGate
BleachBit
Microsoft Bing
Dictionary.com
Giphy
The most popular Android Apps mentioned in /r/uncensorednews:
The most popular reviews in /r/uncensorednews:
Google Alternatives
Search:
yacy.net – decentralised search, removes being reliant on a corporation for your search results
startpage.com – uses Googles engine but stands between you and google as a proxy
duckduckgo.com – does not collect private information on you
ixquick.com – same as Startpage
yandex.com – Russia's answer to Google
bing.com – Microsofts alternative
Cloud Storage:
mega.nz – gives you 50 gigs free storage and is encrypted
dropbox.com – we all know it already
Browsers:
Firefox - Also had some SJW shit going on but not google
Brave Browser - Ok alternative for basic users
Vivaldi - Chromium based Norwegian browser, extremely customisable
Opera - Chromium based Chinese owned browser
Pale Moon - Open Source fork of FireFox
Edge (Windows) - Microsoft's browser
Safari (Mac OS) - Apple's browser
Epic Browser - Privacy focused Chromium based browser
Email (to name a few):
tutanota.com - encrypted email based in Germany
protonmail.com - encrypted email based in Switzerland
gmx.com - massive storage for email based in Germany
Fuck Google Add-ons
Google makes money by tracking and logging what you do. There's a ton of ways to make their life a bitch trying to do that or by blocking them from doing so. Best solution is to not use google products but at times most of us have to.
Bare minimum add-ons:
ublock origin - a non BS no sell out open source ad blocker unlike Adblock etc. who want to make money on your ass
Disconnect - blocks sites from tracking you
There are many many more add-ons etc. to increase your privacy and security but the two above are a bare minimum. For the ones who're a bit more tech savvy I can recommend uMatrix. For a more comprehensive list on how to stop corporations and big brother following you visit: https://prism-break.org/en/
He's a philosopher philosophizing about the moral implications of genocide. He is, by virtue of his profession, indulging every pretext which could justify the behavior. Of course I wouldn't expect the morons in this sub to understand the structure of a philosophic paper, but instead to react compulsively like the hysteric shits they are.
But here is the paragraph from his paper which has these morons panties in a ruffle (without entire sentences redacted):
>Reactions of this sort are overblown: while I dispute the idea that genocide is necessarily immoral—one can always concoct a bizarre hypothetical scenario in which the destruction of a way of life is a moral imperative—I do not think that any widely recognized historical instance of the phenomenon was morally excusable. In one sense, then, this particular implication of my view does not amount to all that much. But in another, it does. If the argument of this paper is correct, then there may be a case for classifying as genocide campaigns of social destruction that are widely considered to be not only excusable but morally required. Eliminating the institution of slavery in the American South—which en-tailed the liquidation of a comprehensive way of life passed down from one slave-owning generation to the next—was certainly a moral and political imperative.
So you idiots can go to sleep comfortably at night knowing that the only people out to destroy your lives are these right-wing propagandists trying to corrupt your minds.
Google Alternatives
Search:
yacy.net – decentralised search, removes being reliant on a corporation for your search results
startpage.com – uses Googles engine but stands between you and google as a proxy
duckduckgo.com – does not collect private information on you
ixquick.com – same as Startpage
yandex.com – Russia's answer to Google
bing.com – Microsofts alternative
Cloud Storage:
mega.nz – gives you 50 gigs free storage and is encrypted
dropbox.com – we all know it already
Browsers:
Firefox - Also had some SJW shit going on but not google
Brave Browser - Ok alternative for basic users
Vivaldi - Chromium based Norwegian browser, extremely customisable
Opera - Chromium based Chinese owned browser
Pale Moon - Open Source fork of FireFox
Edge (Windows) - Microsoft's browser
Safari (Mac OS) - Apple's browser
Epic Browser - Privacy focused Chromium based browser
Email (to name a few):
tutanota.com - encrypted email based in Germany
protonmail.com - encrypted email based in Switzerland
gmx.com - massive storage for email based in Germany
Fuck Google Add-ons
Google makes money by tracking and logging what you do. There's a ton of ways to make their life a bitch trying to do that or by blocking them from doing so. Best solution is to not use google products but at times most of us have to.
Bare minimum add-ons:
ublock origin - a non BS no sell out open source ad blocker unlike Adblock etc. who want to make money on your ass
Disconnect - blocks sites from tracking you
There are many many more add-ons etc. to increase your privacy and security but the two above are a bare minimum. For the ones who're a bit more tech savvy I can recommend uMatrix. For a more comprehensive list on how to stop corporations and big brother following you visit: https://prism-break.org/en/
Moloch, specifically.
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14333
At the bottom of the email:
"With fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch . . . "
https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=26776&cid=2896625
> by StoneTear ( 469183 ) on Thursday January 24, 2002 @04:38PM (#2896625)
> I'm contracted to a state government, and let me tell you, everyone here saves EVERYthing for cover-your-ass purposes.. it's really sad to see every little memo back to 1997 in someone's inbox taking up PHAT amounts of disk space on the GroupWise server ... sigh
Well, not everything, as it turns out.
Africa's population is projected to hit 4 billion by the end of the century. Europe better get ready to start sinking some boats.
> That would be an excellent way to further expose her.
Expose what exactly? There's plenty of shady stuff about Hillary to "expose" - the fact that she uses apps to post to more than one Twitter account at a time just shows that she's employed a "Social Media Expert" with at least 1 days experience.
It's not even a new concept really - it's called a media embargo. In this case, a SOCIAL media embargo. You produce the content that you want to release, ahead of time, and then schedule when you want it to go live.
In fact, I've got numerous friends that use tools like this, just to post their holiday photos, so it's not 100 photos being posted at once and then radio silence for another 6 months!
Here, you can try it out yourself: https://buffer.com/
I hope that one day we'll finally get a transparent, blockchain based reddit-like platform where this type of shit won't be possible. Reddit is currently ranked #4 in the US according to Alexa, and it keeps going up. Estimated daily time on site is 16:40, which is more than any other site in top 10.
Reddit is simply huge and it just keeps growing. Because of this, it can be successfully used for various manipulations, as we're constantly witnessing. All default subs are censored and any comment that goes against the narrative gets deleted in a matter of minutes. Other subreddits get quarantined or banned on a regular basis. Situation is getting drastically worse every year, and I'm quite certain that trend won't change.
> Most what you wanted me to read on imgur is absolute garbage, or had nothing to do with my comment.
"Ur wrong"
k, thanks.
>one single person
Pretty sure it's more than one, think I've illustrated that a touch. https://youtu.be/8WhaY7suBVM
>it doesn't mean that all Jews watch CNN
No way, you mean jews aren't interested in watching jewish owned and operated fake brainwashing media used to control, divide and conquer citizens? Shocking.
>I'm Jewish.
Checks out.
Pack it up everyone, got an impossible to convince jew that claims to know the truth that jews are totally innocent victims uninvolved in any wrong doing despite oceans of evidence contrary. Guess everyone and 100s of civilizations through out history were just making it all up.
I actually believe you may well be a jew, but more likely you are a jew shill. Either way, your words have the opposite of intended effect.
82% of black women are overweight: https://stateofobesity.org/disparities/blacks/
48% of black women have herpes: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124628530
Every single nigger female looks exactly the same.
Well your comment is still wrong.
The article you linked some crazy number "pledged" to remove ads.
The only actual advertising info is a random site that counted them. Ad numbers do not equal ad revenue.
Every other source I can find points back to those couple of articles that have 0 hard facts.
The only publicly available info is the Alexa ranking, which had a bug.
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/breitbart.com
But hey, whatever gets your dick hard.
This is too perfect, the most odious, effeminate, communist, beast of the bunch got taken down by a red, redneck truck, on Christmas.
I am saving this before their coreligionists at jewtube take it down.
Now and for the rest of my life whenever I hear or read the word "Schadenfreude" a low quality video of this event will play in my head.
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=rcaDO7SY4-4&feature=youtu.be&t=88
> I don't know.
It's not a best seller for no reason.
>I'm not gonna get into an argument about gun control with you.
Nah you're just going to try and lie to me, then back out once I point out that anyone with eyes can see exactly what liberals will do with gun rights if given the chance.
>According to you
You immediately spit out a straw man after this point.
>Someday you'll realize your idiocy.
There's that liberal condescension. Your faux intellectualism is showing.
>I won't mourn you.
Of course you won't, in all likelihood we don't know each other. I don't know why you think that your disapproval of me is a weapon, because I genuinely don't care for the opinion of a fake American like you. You can click your tongue and chide me all you like, you might as well be a squirrel chittering for all I care.
Are you serious?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/then?show=0&t=1369719322
Look at 3.b. The body clause of the sentence is inferred by what the OP said, and the "then" links that inference.
And fuck you.
In the apocalympics sub there is talk that this may be a fabrication.
Edit: according to ESPN, the IOC responded saying this wasn't true. His mom to multiple media outlets otherwise, something happened but I'd not be surprised if the IOC tries to cover up for bad press. I guess we wait and see.
It's a shame this is downvoted as it's actually factual.
>ultimately from Arabic ḥarīm, literally, something forbidden & ḥaram, literally, sanctuary. First Known Use: 1623
Another way of looking at this is simply to question the data its based off of. Do black people actually have an IQ of 75. Where is this data coming from?
I had some super racist guy throwing "The Wealth of Nations" at me once, and it turns out most of the data used in that book is based off of extremely limited sample-size and then they used these poor data-sets to arbitrarily extrapolate data about neighboring countries.
It sounded like a half-decent argument into why blacks suck, until you got into what they were basing all their claims off of.
> Hillary has said much more fucked up shit
Shut up you deplorable "basement dweller" always on "colored people time", we all know that: "Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children."
What he did is obviously wrong and he deserves the most severe punishment available. Dude is sick.
The title of this post is wrong from a medical point of view. An HIV-positive person can not give someone AIDs. HIV causes AIDS, the disease you can get after the virus has infected your body and weakened your immune system. Not everyone who has HIV will get AIDS, though. Many people with the virus don’t know they have it. There are nearly 50,000 new cases of it each year in the U.S. (source)
Edit: fixed a mispelling.
Jeff Weaver:
>That term was used by democratic state party officials. That wasn't our term. They've been getting huge donations from wealthy people and doing two things. They said they would give it to the state parties. The state parties have gotten 1% of the money. What they have done is quite remarkable. No one has done it before. They take the money they get from people from contributions above the limit that they are allowed to take and turn it into a small dollar contribution machine which all goes to the Clinton campaign. They are turning it into a small dollar contribution machine that goes to the Clinton campaign. Money that goes to the state parties gets vacuumed up by the DNC sometimes, according to the news report, when state parties don't realize the money is being taken out of their account. It's quite phenomenal.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10358
Another one about money laundering here: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6230
Wait, aren't the Airbnb properties owned by the people participating in Airbnb?
I understand they have policies, but how can they justify different requirements for EU & USA but not outside? If it is outside of the local laws protection?
> Outside of the United States and the European Union, some countries or communities may allow or even require people to make accommodation distinctions based on, for example, marital status, national origin, gender or sexual orientation, in violation of our general nondiscrimination philosophy. In these cases, we do not require hosts to violate local laws, nor to accept guests that could expose the hosts to a real and demonstrable risk of arrest, or physical harm to their persons or property.
https://www.airbnb.com/help/article/1405/airbnb-s-nondiscrimination-policy--our-commitment-to-inclusion-and-respect?topic=250
What if there are no counter-laws, but there is clear & present danger to the potential client if they stay there?
Will Airbnb provide the legal protection for the renter?
>HIV nowadays just means you'll be on meds the rest of your life
Meds which cost a crapton of money and come with a list of side effects so long it's not even funny - additionally, some of those are fairly common.
https://www.webmd.com/hiv-aids/aids-hiv-medication-side-effects
Do you like having diarrhea, nausea and insomnia for the rest of your life? No? Well, too bad.
I'm curious what the person in your quote would consider "relevant to the experiences and legacy of African-American boys”?
What piece of classic literature fits the bill? It can't be Mark Twain. He died over 100 years ago. Hell, even The Autobiography of Malcolm X would have a few rude awakenings.
Heather heyer died of a heart attack, doubtful she was ever hit, there was no intent to murder. https://hooktube.com/watch?v=fSmR8ZS06VM If there was intent to murder, he would have plowed into a crowed, goring them into the walls with great ease.
Google Alternatives
Search:
yacy.net – decentralised search, removes being reliant on a corporation for your search results
startpage.com – uses Googles engine but stands between you and google as a proxy
duckduckgo.com – does not collect private information on you
ixquick.com – same as Startpage
yandex.com – Russia's answer to Google
bing.com – Microsofts alternative
Cloud Storage:
mega.nz – gives you 50 gigs free storage and is encrypted
dropbox.com – we all know it already
Browsers:
Firefox - Also had some SJW shit going on but not google
Brave Browser - Ok alternative for basic users
Vivaldi - Chromium based Norwegian browser, extremely customisable
Opera - Chromium based Chinese owned browser
Pale Moon - Open Source fork of FireFox
Edge (Windows) - Microsoft's browser
Safari (Mac OS) - Apple's browser
Epic Browser - Privacy focused Chromium based browser
Email (to name a few):
tutanota.com - encrypted email based in Germany
protonmail.com - encrypted email based in Switzerland
gmx.com - massive storage for email based in Germany
Fuck Google Add-ons
Google makes money by tracking and logging what you do. There's a ton of ways to make their life a bitch trying to do that or by blocking them from doing so. Best solution is to not use google products but at times most of us have to.
Bare minimum add-ons:
ublock origin - a non BS no sell out open source ad blocker unlike Adblock etc. who want to make money on your ass
Disconnect - blocks sites from tracking you
There are many many more add-ons etc. to increase your privacy and security but the two above are a bare minimum. For the ones who're a bit more tech savvy I can recommend uMatrix. For a more comprehensive list on how to stop corporations and big brother following you visit: https://prism-break.org/en/
Google Alternatives
Search:
yacy.net – decentralised search, removes being reliant on a corporation for your search results
startpage.com – uses Googles engine but stands between you and google as a proxy
duckduckgo.com – does not collect private information on you
ixquick.com – same as Startpage
yandex.com – Russia's answer to Google
bing.com – Microsofts alternative
Cloud Storage:
mega.nz – gives you 50 gigs free storage and is encrypted
dropbox.com – we all know it already
Browsers:
Firefox - Also had some SJW shit going on but not google
Brave Browser - Ok alternative for basic users
Vivaldi - Chromium based Norwegian browser, extremely customisable
Opera - Chromium based Chinese owned browser
Pale Moon - Open Source fork of FireFox
Edge (Windows) - Microsoft's browser
Safari (Mac OS) - Apple's browser
Epic Browser - Privacy focused Chromium based browser
Email (to name a few):
tutanota.com - encrypted email based in Germany
protonmail.com - encrypted email based in Switzerland
gmx.com - massive storage for email based in Germany
Fuck Google Add-ons
Google makes money by tracking and logging what you do. There's a ton of ways to make their life a bitch trying to do that or by blocking them from doing so. Best solution is to not use google products but at times most of us have to.
Bare minimum add-ons:
ublock origin - a non BS no sell out open source ad blocker unlike Adblock etc. who want to make money on your ass
Disconnect - blocks sites from tracking you
There are many many more add-ons etc. to increase your privacy and security but the two above are a bare minimum. For the ones who're a bit more tech savvy I can recommend uMatrix. For a more comprehensive list on how to stop corporations and big brother following you visit: https://prism-break.org/en/
Every time I've tried sharing this on Politico's FB posts, my comment has been deleted:
"Politico reporter colluding with DNC:
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808"
Now if I try to, I get automatically logged out of my account.
Israel shares intelligence with the Five Eyes, also with Jordan and Saudi Arabia, has deep trade ties with Europe and China, a thriving tourist line to India (its nearly mandatory for Israelis leaving conscripted service to go let off steam and do drugs in India lol) and military sales as far afield as Colombia, Singapore and Canada.
The era of a beleaguered and outnumbered Israel surrounded by enemies ended in 1972.
Did you forget the Curveball
>Curveball, who claimed to be an Iraqi chemical engineer with knowledge of even the country's most secret weapons programs, spilled the beans in a big way when debriefed by German intelligence officials. But, as Drogin would later report, he was a twitchy, possibly mentally disturbed drunk who was prone to rapid mood-swings and whose story tended to shift according to what he thought investigators wanted to hear. But despite that fact, and with only the "corroboration" of a few ex-patriots associated with convicted fraudster Ahmed Chalabi, Curveball's claims passed through several layers of often skeptical intelligence professionals and became 'Exhibit A' in the administration's case for war.
When you're ~~looking~~ shopping for intelligence to fit your preconceived conclusions nothing else matters.
>That's not the way the world really works anymore. We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.
> - Karl Rove
If it was a site that was created within the last week or so and only had articles specifically tailored to that type of topic? Yes.
This is the internet, it literally gives anyone the ability to spread their desired message to the world from the convenience of their own shithole. Before taking something as serious and running with it as an actual problem, you now need to take a closer look at the source to determine whether or not it is something that is actually serious.
This sub, of all subs, should know all about "Fake News" and should be very critical of anything that is so outlandish as this. But for some reason if the topic is in line with pre-conceived notions people just take it as gospel and run with it.
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/medusamagazine.com
Here are the SEO rankings for the site in question, the first graph shows traffic totals... You will notice that this site has only received traffic for a few weeks tops, and it jumped from 0 views to thousands of views daily in a matter of days.
This is not something that happens on the internet with a woman's blog. It happens when someone specifically targets a certain group's mentality with a controversial post and then posts it repeatedly on facebook, Reddit and other sites.
Anyone who believes this is a serious article is being catfished.
I'm going to post this each time someone makes this claim:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unnaturalized
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illegal%20alien/immigrant
Unnaturalized does not necessarily mean illegal. It just means they don't have citizenship. Under your interpretation, when you as a U.S. citizen live in Japan temporarily for work after going through customs & govt procedures, then you're an illegal alien. But maybe that's an #alternative fact X)
From the Merriam-Webster dictionary website:
>Although English speakers sometimes use "condone" with the intended meaning "approve of" or "encourage," the more established meaning is closer to "pardon" or "overlook." "Condone" comes from the Latin verb condonare, which means "to absolve."
Wow, he makes some really great points.
I've been a Dilbert fan for years, but have also really enjoyed his non fiction books as well. His most recent book, "How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big" was a really great read.
I'm still not sure if I'm going to vote this year or not, but the guy makes a solid case...
The Clinton's are just puppets. The connections are higher up the chain. You should read The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt, by Edmund Morris for a look at how this all began. It's a good read as well, incredible guy, wish we had him now.
Incase you don't bother reading the article, or somebody already posted one that doesn't have the wikileaks linked, they're right here.
Well, now you're just splitting hairs. Makes little difference to those subjugated what you call it. Also, you shouldn't cite wikipedia although I'll concede the point.
Let's have a look in the dictionary for what editorialized means.
The rules about editorialized titles do not state that the submission with an editorialized title becomes illegal resubmit with the correct title.
I have said previously and will say it again, I usually instruct the user to resubmit with the correct title. If they don't do that then that's their fault.
Let's make this crystal clear:
There is a link, lets say cnn(dot)com/newsarticle1.
There is a submission, which is when that link gets put here into r/uncensorednews. The user who is eligible to submit puts something in the title text box, and if this title does not correspond to the title of the linked news item (in this case News Article 1), then the submission is removed on grounds of editorialized title.
The link does not become illegal as a result, and anyone is welcome to resubmit the link with the correct title.
How is this so hard to understand?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unnaturalized
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illegal%20alien/immigrant
Unnaturalized does not necessarily mean illegal. It just means they don't have citizenship. Under your interpretation, when you as a U.S. citizen live in Japan temporarily for work after going through customs & govt procedures, then you're an illegal alien. But maybe that's an #alternative fact X)
>The Jews don't care one bit about the white race
They are trying to genocide whites. https://vid.me/Skhv
>or social imbalances
They produce them. https://www.bitchute.com/video/h6HhcaU11ahx/ This book will illustrate these things and more.
I'm a trained historian, and I purchased this book from Amazon, following which I wrote a thoughtful 5-star review. Some days later not only did Amazon delete my review of the book, they deleted all my reviews.
Bezos is an Alt-Left tyrant lying hypocrite cuck and Amazon web-managers are LBGTQIA+ f*ckin' cucks.
I lost all respect for the website and the author the second it listed global warming.
And I wanted to believe the rest.
Global warming? Let's assume it's fake. POLLUTION ISN'T fake. Nobody is debating the amount of adults dying, and children with serious asthma and allergies, that are caused directly by pollution. Nobody is debating the island of trash floating in the ocean. Nobody is debating that the BP oil spill was a sick fucked up event.
So ignore global warming for a moment altogether.
WE STILL NEED TO FIX POLLUTION.
It feels like Global Warming is this super-fucked-up distraction that the Left and the Right have both agreed to do, in order to distract everyone from the fact they're still dumping toxic shit straight into our drinking waters. I should know. I visited a client last year which literally "legally" dumped thousands of gallons of paint waste from dyeing textiles, straight into the sewers. All they had to do was "buffer it" in a large building container so that it didn't send too much into the sewers at one moment. But it still sent the same TOTAL amount.
I've also visited companies that will literally dump toxic shit into a river if the cost of the EPA fine is less than the cost of rebuilding the machinery that will be destroyed. The EPA and our government have actually made it EASIER for people to write off their immoral decisions because in people's mind, "I paid the fine, so I'm good now." (See Predictably Irrational, which discusses how a daycare that charged people for being late, ended up with more late adults because they no longer felt guilty after paying the fine. It became a transaction.) They've turned our backyards and our health into a simple accounting equation.
Read my past posts. I'm no tree hugging hippy. But I know a fucked up thing when I see it.
are you saying these people
https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=pakistani&FORM=HDRSC2
do not get classified as white. /s
Edit: wait a minute guardian is saying the victims are white. not talking about the criminals. What bullshit are you trying to pull here.
TV ratings are different than internet traffic, of which CNN is something like 2nd in the US.
http://www.alexa.com/topsites/category/News
Not defending them, just pointing out the fallacy in this "CNN ratings drop" trope.
Not many younger people have cable, let alone get their news from it.
Oops: CIA has found no link between Orlando shooter and ISIS.
> "Reinforcing four days of internal government assessments across multiple agencies and a Federal Bureau of Investigation inquiry, the CIA director, John Brennan, contrasted “lone wolf” killers in Orlando, and San Bernardino last December, with recent terrorist attacks in Paris and Brussels, which he told the Senate intelligence committee were “directed” by Isis leadership in Syria and Iraq."
Anyone can "claim" anything about themselves. That doesn't actually make someone legitimately associated with a terror organisation on an official level lol. Ever heard of lonewolf terrorists? They attach themselves to any random terror "cause" they think gives them the power, fame or martyrdom they believe they're entitled to.
Congrats on letting racist media shift your focus entirely from the blatant homophobia of murdering gay people in a gay club during Pride Month at 2am on a weekend when clubs are at full capacity, though.
This was a homophobic terror attack. I don't need to bold and enlarge that text because that should've been fucking obvious to you the minute you heard the shooting took place in a specific safe space designed for LGBT+ people.
Terror attacks can be motivated for numerous reasons, not just one. Technically there is no attaching a "reason" or "motivation" to lonewolves because they literally just act of their own accord (which also makes them that much more difficult to protect people from because they could be anyone).
That quote is from an essay titled Juristic <strong>Classification</strong> of Islamic law. If you read the passage in context, he is making a conclusion about a fact based on literature that is considered authentic by all Muslim jurists. There is nothing in the essay that indicates he personally endorses such idea. He also says in the same article that
“it has to be admitted, however, that the Quran, being basically a book of religious guidance, is not an easy reference for legal studies. It is more particularly an appeal to faith and the human soul rather than a classification of legal prescriptions.”
Likewise people are pointing to his book review as a proof that Khan supports Sharia law, but if you actually read it, there is nothing the review it that supports such idea.
If someone earns less than 11,880 a year, they are not allowed to get the healthcare program. Many republican states don't give Medicaid to them either.
Source: https://www.healthcare.gov/lower-costs/qualifying-for-lower-costs/
Oh wow, never heard of these types of "plans." From the following couple articles I read it sounds like a strangely good option among so many terrible options. May have to read more later when I have time. Thanks.
More like your ipod would be smashed to bits, you'd be grilled in a dark room about why you did this and the usb ports on the computers are disabled anyways.
Going to upvote you cause that lends some credence to any allegations. It's worth mentioning that Fritz Scheuren is not actually the person over seeing the data collection and methods but is just looking at findings. He also has previous pieces in actual journals that explaining how differences between exit polls and vote count can be explained without fraud. His already very cautious quotes they have on that website were cut from a much larger and cautiously worded paragraph.
Quote for reference: "As a statistician, I find the results of the 2016 primary voting unusual. In fact, I found the patterns unexpected [and possibly even] suspicious. There is a greater degree of smoothness in the outcomes than the roughness that is typical in raw/real data."
Source of work actually publish by fritz Scheuren: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261640124_Explaining_Discrepancies_between_Official_Votes_and_Exit_Polls_in_the_2004_Presidential_Election
>You're claim is that because the GOVERNMENTS of a few countries have criminalized being gay, that it is somehow related to regular Muslims killing gay people?
Yes it is. Many goverment of muslim had made homosexuality illegal, how is that point laughable?
> Now if you were to show me a statistic that said ALL Muslims, regardless of what country that are from, kill gay/lesbians on a regular basis, then you would have an argument.
What is regular basis? It is dangerous for gays in muslim ghettos in europe, and in muslim countries, there are statistics about what views muslims have on homosexuality:
Here a poll of western muslims: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/apr/11/british-muslims-strong-sense-of-belonging-poll-homosexuality-sharia-law
"However, when asked to what extent they agreed or disagreed that homosexuality should be legal in Britain, 18% said they agreed and 52% said they disagreed, compared with 5% among the public at large who disagreed"
52% vs 5%, pretty steep difference.
It was good up until the point where they claimed that any claims of an EU army were practically conspiracy theories even though one of their own ministers actively and publicly endorses the creation of one.
Nope. My views are not extreme. Historically, people built houses first and walls second. Nations protected their territory, culture and prosperity. No one, ever, welcomed unchecked immigration from hostile, culturally incompatible, cognitively inferior (on average) strangers. The demographic trends alone will wipe us out if we don't reverse it.
You are calling it extreme because you believe it's a fringe attitude. It's not. Historically it's not and even now the overwhelming number of countries protects their borders from undesirables. Ask the Saudis, Japanese, Russians and Nigerians for confirmation.
This fake globalist narrative is only sold in the US, Canada, Europe and Australia. All those white nations are getting propagandised into racial and national suicide. It's not going to work. We are figuring it out and uniting. It's not a fringe opinion anymore. Call it blowback if you want.
>Every individual should be seen and judged as one person
True. I never had a problem with individuals just because of their race. We can see them and judge them at the border. Right now Europe doesn't need any new bodies. Charity begins at home.
Ultimately, we'll even have to expel most of the undesirables and prosecute the globalist traitors. There's no other way to fix this clusterfuck, unfortunately.
It's the population of Europe not a statement on politics or something and this isn't a research paper. In the time you took to type this you could have googled it.
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/europe-population/
https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Graphs/DemographicProfiles/
Is this good enough for you?
I'm going to post this each time someone makes this claim:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unnaturalized
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/illegal%20alien/immigrant
Unnaturalized does not necessarily mean illegal. It just means they don't have citizenship. Under your interpretation, when you as a U.S. citizen live in Japan temporarily for work after going through customs & govt procedures, then you're an illegal alien. But maybe that's an #alternative fact X)
Great fucking use of the word "defenestrate" as it has two meanings!
The most obvious meaning it has is as "a usually swift dismissal or expulsion"... AKA: Firing a person.
The second meaning is to throw "of a person or thing out of a window", which is why the word choice is so brilliant as it hearkens back to a particular group's trend of Throwing people off of rooftops...
... While you have some details correct, you're completely wrong on others. Yes, timestamps are internally represented as seconds since the epoch. However, the timestamps on a file (created time, last modified time, last access time) are completely unprotected by all major OSes (windows, linux, macOS). Those timestamps can be altered by any program. Here's an example of how to change timestamps in perl: https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/perl-cookbook/1565922433/ch09s02.html
I'm not lying or misrepresenting anything.
Say what you want about that, but whites do not have the -bare minimum- replacement birth rate of 2.1. While whites squabble endlessly about "PROTECT THE CHILDREN" islamists are pumping out babies.
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=kjio2sXNnLQ
So yippie? Our women are 'beating' teen pregnancy and going on to college become really mediocre... womens history majors, art teachers and feminist fart dance therapy instructors. Woohoo.
The drivers license age in South Dakota is 14, an extreme fatal responsibility. But in many places, have sex with 16-17 year old? "OMG AHHH SAVE US ALL AHHH! PROTECT THE CHILDREN!"
Well, that too is somewhat debatable: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3403000143.html
I must say that I have no hard stances in this matter, but as an European, there seems to be too much politics in the matter of racial- or intelligence-based research.
You're right, I never said it wasn't. Expecting people to just switch religions is unrealistic is what I referring to. You have to understand that there are non-affiliates to Islam, just like all religions -- people who just claim to be X without actually closely following the religion. It's called being non denominational. Now is it fair for those to be prosecuted as if they are affiliates, devout, extremists, etc.? Absolutely not. Stop blurring a line that needs to be maintained clear, only harm will come by doing this.
Google Alternatives
Search:
yacy.net – decentralised search, removes being reliant on a corporation for your search results
startpage.com – uses Googles engine but stands between you and google as a proxy
duckduckgo.com – does not collect private information on you
ixquick.com – same as Startpage
yandex.com – Russia's answer to Google
bing.com – Microsofts alternative
Cloud Storage:
mega.nz – gives you 50 gigs free storage and is encrypted
dropbox.com – we all know it already
Browsers:
Firefox - Also had some SJW shit going on but not google
Brave Browser - Ok alternative for basic users
Vivaldi - Chromium based Norwegian browser, extremely customisable
Opera - Chromium based Chinese owned browser
Pale Moon - Open Source fork of FireFox
Edge (Windows) - Microsoft's browser
Safari (Mac OS) - Apple's browser
Epic Browser - Privacy focused Chromium based browser
Email (to name a few):
tutanota.com - encrypted email based in Germany
protonmail.com - encrypted email based in Switzerland
gmx.com - massive storage for email based in Germany
Fuck Google Add-ons
Google makes money by tracking and logging what you do. There's a ton of ways to make their life a bitch trying to do that or by blocking them from doing so. Best solution is to not use google products but at times most of us have to.
Bare minimum add-ons:
ublock origin - a non BS no sell out open source ad blocker unlike Adblock etc. who want to make money on your ass
Disconnect - blocks sites from tracking you
There are many many more add-ons etc. to increase your privacy and security but the two above are a bare minimum. For the ones who're a bit more tech savvy I can recommend uMatrix. For a more comprehensive list on how to stop corporations and big brother following you visit: https://prism-break.org/en/
Google Alternatives
Search:
yacy.net – decentralised search, removes being reliant on a corporation for your search results
startpage.com – uses Googles engine but stands between you and google as a proxy
duckduckgo.com – does not collect private information on you
ixquick.com – same as Startpage
yandex.com – Russia's answer to Google
bing.com – Microsofts alternative
Cloud Storage:
mega.nz – gives you 50 gigs free storage and is encrypted
dropbox.com – we all know it already
Browsers:
Firefox - Also had some SJW shit going on but not google
Brave Browser - Ok alternative for basic users
Vivaldi - Chromium based Norwegian browser, extremely customisable
Opera - Chromium based Chinese owned browser
Pale Moon - Open Source fork of FireFox
Edge (Windows) - Microsoft's browser
Safari (Mac OS) - Apple's browser
Epic Browser - Privacy focused Chromium based browser
Email (to name a few):
tutanota.com - encrypted email based in Germany
protonmail.com - encrypted email based in Switzerland
gmx.com - massive storage for email based in Germany
Fuck Google Add-ons
Google makes money by tracking and logging what you do. There's a ton of ways to make their life a bitch trying to do that or by blocking them from doing so. Best solution is to not use google products but at times most of us have to.
Bare minimum add-ons:
ublock origin - a non BS no sell out open source ad blocker unlike Adblock etc. who want to make money on your ass
Disconnect - blocks sites from tracking you
There are many many more add-ons etc. to increase your privacy and security but the two above are a bare minimum. For the ones who're a bit more tech savvy I can recommend uMatrix. For a more comprehensive list on how to stop corporations and big brother following you visit: https://prism-break.org/en/
Google Alternatives
Search:
yacy.net – decentralised search, removes being reliant on a corporation for your search results
startpage.com – uses Googles engine but stands between you and google as a proxy
duckduckgo.com – does not collect private information on you
ixquick.com – same as Startpage
yandex.com – Russia's answer to Google
bing.com – Microsofts alternative
Cloud Storage:
mega.nz – gives you 50 gigs free storage and is encrypted
dropbox.com – we all know it already
Browsers:
Firefox - Also had some SJW shit going on but not google
Brave Browser - Ok alternative for basic users
Vivaldi - Chromium based Norwegian browser, extremely customisable
Opera - Chromium based Chinese owned browser
Pale Moon - Open Source fork of FireFox
Edge (Windows) - Microsoft's browser
Safari (Mac OS) - Apple's browser
Epic Browser - Privacy focused Chromium based browser
Email (to name a few):
tutanota.com - encrypted email based in Germany
protonmail.com - encrypted email based in Switzerland
gmx.com - massive storage for email based in Germany
Fuck Google Add-ons
Google makes money by tracking and logging what you do. There's a ton of ways to make their life a bitch trying to do that or by blocking them from doing so. Best solution is to not use google products but at times most of us have to.
Bare minimum add-ons:
ublock origin - a non BS no sell out open source ad blocker unlike Adblock etc. who want to make money on your ass
Disconnect - blocks sites from tracking you
There are many many more add-ons etc. to increase your privacy and security but the two above are a bare minimum. For the ones who're a bit more tech savvy I can recommend uMatrix. For a more comprehensive list on how to stop corporations and big brother following you visit: https://prism-break.org/en/
Unfortunately, malware makes a lot of money for the people who operate it. It's a very low risk / high reward business so there's a lot of incentive for bad guys to find innovative ways to spread malware. Right now there's a new strain for ransom-ware that operates like a pyramid scheme. You can either pay the ransom, or get 3 of your friends to infect their machines to get the decryption key. It's really nasty business.
Your best defense is awareness (and a browser plug-on or two), which is why I'm sending you this. Personally, I don't web surf without the following plug-ins installed:
NoScript: Prevents all JavaScript from running unless you allow it.
uBlock Origin: A wide-spectrum blocker that blocks much more than ads. It is available for all major browsers. A quick Google search will give you a download link for the browser of your choice.
Privacy Badger: A nifty tool from the EFF that stops collection of your online activity.
I Highly recommend you take a look at them.
12 million? Oh please. A drop in the communist bucket.
And seriously? Have you read a history book? WW2 was directly a result of Bolshevik communism taking hold in Germany after it's rise after WW1
Vietnam and Korea were also communist. As was the Cold war.
Pretty much every major war in the last 100 years was communists trying to take over
https://www.minds.com/archive/thumbnail/675940318687797255/xlarge
https://overpassesforamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/death-toll-of-communism.jpg
Sorry, but that's an absurd accusation in every way. Opera is using a common VPN company called SurfEasy, who say this:
> No one will know what you do online. Not even us. SurfEasy is a no-log network. We don’t keep a record of any information about you, your browsing activity or downloading history on our servers.
and...
> The SurfEasy network is a No Log network. SurfEasy does not store users originating IP address when connected to our service and therefore cannot identify users when provided IP addresses of our servers. Additionally, SurfEasy cannot disclose information about the applications, services or websites our users consume while connected to our services; as SurfEasy does not store this information.
And of course, if you think the UK government wants to pay some random mix of foreign companies for your browsing history, you're delusional.
I harbor no illusions about our relationship with Israel. Hell, they attacked us during the Six-Day War.
But they're a thriving, peaceful democracy in an area of the world where every other Muslim shithole country is a massive pain in the ass. Plus, they're a great underdog story. In just a couple generations, they went from gas chambers to a thriving tech sector with more startups per square mile than Silicon Valley.
And Israeli commandos have forgotten more about killing shitbag Muslims terrorists than ours have yet learned. Read Ghost Warriors. I mean, holy shit, they are the tip of the spear when it comes to Counter-Islamism. And fuck yes, I'm all for that.
And I respect their culture. They value education, hard work, humility. They are the polar opposite of the hoodrats that I fucking loathe.
So yeah, I really don't get all the antisemitism in here. I've always associated antisemitism with uneducated "dey took er jerbs" sort of people. But I went to great schools, and knew a lot of really smart, funny Jewish people, so I just disagree with all this Hitler youth vibe in here.
This is actually complicated stuff.
If you really want to learn more, I'd suggest you start here: https://www.amazon.com/Statistics-Hypotheses-E-Wayne-Courtney-ebook/dp/B072J38X28/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1499910514&sr=8-3&keywords=null+hypothesis
When discussing the effects of fast twitch muscle fiber, that gets into an area of biology that I'm not an expert in. I don't have a good reference, but I bet your local community college could give you some good places to start researching.
Remember when they call someone a Nazi or a fascist, throw this at them.
https://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Fascism-American-Mussolini-Politics/dp/0767917189
Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist.
Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal.
If you really are interested you should read a book called Certain Samaritans, I think you will like it.
https://www.amazon.com/Certain-Samaritans-Esther-Pohl-Lovejoy/dp/1258279371
Whut? I see 1.5 stars? Where are you guys looking at? https://www.amazon.com/Stronger-Together-Blueprint-Americas-Future/dp/1501161733/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1474896875&sr=8-1&keywords=stronger+together
I am not throwing insults, I am pretty calm and just explaining that you have a lot to learn next time you want to prove a point on the internet. This isn't a public rally and you can't shoo me away with your screaming and by pointing a finger in my face.
None of my arguments were ad hominem, you are projecting. I was perfectly able to explain why I think what Beyoncé did was not immoral. You weren't however able to explain why you think it was.
I recommend this book: https://www.amazon.com/Art-Debate-Warren-Choate-Shaw/dp/1230324453/182-3920204-0503923?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0
Happy reading :)