What is Reddit's opinion of
WikiSpooks.com?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
➔ WikiSpooks.com website
By popularity on Reddit, this Service is:
27 reviews of this app found across Reddit:
in defense of your claim, you could cite Operation Gladio as establishing that elites have before used targeting of extreme innocents in order to destabilize the society.
There is no proof because it's wrong.
It happened the other way around. The Rothschilds supported England in every way to bring about the end of the revolution. After America won, they refused to accept a central banking system, and the Rothschilds once again dispatched the British armed forces to teach us a lesson. (1812)
It just so happened that the Tsar of Russia lent naval support to the U.S. to prevent being flanked by sea. The Rothschilds made sure he and his entire family were killed when the Russian revolution came.
As far as 9/11, I doubt the Rothschilds had any direct hand in it, but rather lent a nodding approval. They relied on their vast network of well placed Zionists to perpetrate 9/11.
The official story has so many holes, it comes across like a blatant cover up.
There is some pretty compelling evidence that Israel had the motive and the means to pull off 9/11.
You sent me a book over the internet, nothing old fashioned about that. I checked for this book online, and there's hardly anything about it, other than on a website known as wikispooks which was vague as fuck as to the content. A cursory glance at the author reveals he writes a lot of conspiracy style stuff, which I find to be really hit and miss (emphasis on the miss), with his reviews on amazon ranging from raving fans to people that accuse him of distorting facts, using vague sources (some experts say...) and embellishing stories. Maybe if you actually told some people a brief summary they would be more inclined to read it, yeah?
it was likely a paperclip scientist Dr. Luther Greene who worked at edgewood arsenal, a well known infamous MK-ULTRA site.
i'm a fan of para-politics, or para-political research, or deep politics. these at least are somewhat more likely to fetch curiosity about what that means, rather than triggering behavioral programming with "conspiracy theory".
>Peter Dale Scott employs the term "parapolitics," in a completely different manner, as a manifestation of "Deep Politics":
>"...the investigation of parapolitics, which I defined (with the CIA in mind) as a 'system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished.'...I still see value in this definition and mode of analysis. But parapolitics as thus defined is itself too narrowly conscious and intentional... it describes at best only an intervening layer of the irrationality under our political culture's rational surface. Thus I now refer to parapolitics as only one manifestation of deep politics, all those political practices and arrangements, deliberate or not, which are usually repressed rather than acknowledged."
>The term is used to describe either covert political activity that is hidden from the public or a complete (de facto) political system, typically comprising elements of the military and intelligence apparatus, hidden from the public; political actions of subterfuge, secrecy, and deceit; and is increasingly used in discussions on democracy to describe coalitions of institutions and corporations who operate above or outside of the elected government.
Here's some more info to throw into the ring.
There is no doubt that Israel/Mossad were involved in the planning, execution, and cover-up of 9/11 although I think it's incorrect to say that they were solely responsible (to anyone who may think that).
What's interesting is that Bill Cooper addressed the topic in his book <em>Behold a Pale Horse</em> well over two decades ago.
If you want actual legitimate information about the Franklin Scandal, read the book authored by the man who headed the investigation: http://www.american-buddha.com/franklincoveruptoc.htm
Contained therein are well-supported arguments as to why "reliable media sources" and law enforcement officers regard the allegations as a hoax. It's a part of the "sprawl" that Rustin Cohle describes.
The "hysteria" you speak of, by the way, is only called such because of lobbying by groups like the "False Memory Syndrome Foundation," the advisory board of which is ominously saturated with psychiatrists who have spent their lives doing highly unethical contract work for the national security state. https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/dutroux/FMSF_freaks.htm
Remember, the venerable FBI once dismissed organized crime and the resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan as "hysteria" as well.
Without even scratching the surface of the mountains of evidence suggesting that the Franklin Scandal, don't you find it a little strange that so many important witnesses died? That the victim-witnesses were threatened with jail-time? The Franklin Scandal is not what you think it is, and a lot of what you call "conspiracy theorist garbage" isn't either. You might want to read about the Finders, and this case in Belgium: http://wikispooks.com/ISGP/dutroux/Belgian_X_dossiers_of_the_Dutroux_affair.htm
You've been lied to. The reason you and so many others immediately have all of these preconceived notions about "conspiracy theory garbage" is because that perception is beneficial to certain sectors of society.
>"Were the Soviet Union to sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean, the American military–industrial complex would have to remain, substantially unchanged, until some other adversary could be invented. Anything else would be an unacceptable shock to the American economy.” (emphasis added)
--George F. Kennan in his preface to Norman Cousins's 1987 book The Pathology of Power.
Kennan was present at meetings in DC after WWII which were to shape the CIA and held at James Forrestal’s house...Kennan the Kremlinologist then went about his duty by writing the “Long Telegram” and his “X Article” which helped whip the U.S. into a frenzy and create the Truman Doctrine...eventually, in 1989, Kennan was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by...you guessed it...GHW Bush. Even more interesting is that Kennan’s quote is derivative of one which John Stockwell made:
>In 1980, Stockwell said that "if the Soviet Union were to disappear off the face of the map, the United States would quickly seek out new enemies to justify its own military-industrial complex."[6] http://wikispooks.com/wiki/John_Stockwell
This is just a good summary and introduction to the evidence. Christopher Bollyn has done the lions share of dot connecting, so if you're interested, go look him up. He literally wrote the book on Israel's involvement.
I agree...but sadly the majority of people involved in the machinations of that day were, unfortunately, Jews.
What's funny is that a Jewish guy tried to warn the FBI that Israelis were going to take out WTC that day...and was twice ignored. See:
http://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it#Gomel_Chesed_Cemetery_Incident
There are "rotten apples" in every bunch though. Its not just a Jewish thing.
The Zionists are to blame. Jews and non-jews alike.
I'm Jewish and didn't take place in a coverup...but no doubt some Jewish folks at the highest levels (Chertoff and Wolfowitz spring to mind) did.
Check out the Gomel Chesed Cemetery incident:
http://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it#Gomel_Chesed_Cemetery_Incident
There has been a Jewish presence for a long time in Mumbai, formerly Bombay. So one can assume that Mossad has a strong presence there and is capable of a False Flag operation. The Sassoon's married into the Rothschild family.
> Why would they warn them? If it were me I'd just record the whole thing and make sure I had enough dirt on the perps to keep me safe.
Like the fake OBL videos? Yeah, that's what I thought.
> p.s the dancing israelis said they were there to document the event.. where is their video, pictures etc..? Wouldn't it be damning if it existed?
Collected as evidence, and shipped off to Israel afterwards along with the suspects. No way they would ever let us see that shit.
> that wasn't israel.. zionists maybe, but not necessarily jewish
http://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it
Look here for all the evidence you need. Israeli dual citizens, Mossad, Zionists, they all had a hand in this.
Piper on JFK http://wikispooks.com/w/images/f/f6/Final_Judgment.pdf
video of Piper on JFK http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2utTWSdq8YY
Much more info: http://grizzom.blogspot.com/2013/11/john-fitzgerald-kennedymay-29-1917-nov.html
http://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it
>Netanyahu is considered by some to be the architect of the 9/11, directing the Mossad/Shin Bet, though Mark Gorton infers that George H. W. Bush was the prime mover[17]. Netanyahu was Israeli PM at the time and has a long history of involvement in Israeli terrorism and politics. He's been a prominent member of the Likud Government since 1993. The Likud Party is the literal successor of the Jewish terrorist organization known as the Irgun. He was the prime minister to whom the ACB Doc was presented. Netanyahu wrote a book in the early 80's called Terrorism: How the West Can Win. He founded the Jonathan Institute in the late 1970's to study (and plan) terrorism. Egyptian Intellectual, Hassan Al Bana, has stated publicly that he thinks Netanyahu planned 9/11 with the Jews at the Jonathan Institute. Al Bana cites a book written by Netanyahu called Uprooting Terrorism which speaks of plans to attack the U.N., and the World Trade Center with small nuclear bombs.
> Also, that woman is the leader of the Search for International Terrorist Entities Intelligence Group,
This group is a for profit propaganda agency. http://wikispooks.com/wiki/SITE_Intelligence_Group
This is a PhD thesis.
From the wikispooks page on the author:
>Maurice Tugwell was a career officer in the Parachute Regiment who served in the 1939-45 war and in a succession of colonial counterinsurgency operations.
>Tugwell served most notably in Ireland where he headed the black propaganda Information Policy unit (1971-73 (March)) which operated covertly inside British Army HQ in Lisburn in Northern Ireland.
>After leaving Ireland in March 1973, Tugwell 'transferred to Iran as an instructor at the Imperial Armed Forces College', during the reign of the Shah. 'He was awarded the CBE the same year. In 1975 he went to Nottingham, and in 1976 he took up a defence fellowship at King's College, London'.
>His Phd focused on revolutionary propaganda at King's College in London, following which he moved to Canada and became involved with right wing think tanks including the Centre for Conflict Studies (1980-86) and the Mackenzie Institute (1986-91).
One of the operations he is well-known for managing is Bloody Sunday in 1972 in Northern Ireland.
I believe what you're referring to is 'Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars', a technical manual of sorts allegedly leaked from the first Bilderberg Group meeting in 1954:
It was made famous by none of other Milton William Cooper (author of Behold A Pale Horse), a former Naval intelligence officer turned conspiracy author and whistleblower who had predicted 9/11 (in June, 2001), and was subsequently gunned down on his own property later that year after being ambushed by local deputies.
There are a few well-supported cases of such cults and subsequent cover-ups.
Ever heard of the Franklin Scandal in Omaha? This is a book by the man who investigated it. See how much you can stomach: http://www.american-buddha.com/franklincoveruptoc.htm
What about the Finders in Washington? The network surrounding Marc Dutroux in Belgium? (http://wikispooks.com/ISGP/dutroux/Belgian_X_dossiers_of_the_Dutroux_affair.htm) The Presidio base in San Francisco? (http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/aquino01.htm)
The only reason why it is commonly believed that such activities are the unhinged fantasies of fundamentalists is because the people involved in them have the power to manufacture that perception.
Furthermore, people like Vigilant Citizen wouldn't have anything to work with it wasn't for the fact that popular culture has consistently shown an obsession with certain occult themes and symbols for quite a long time. Even the most rigid rationalist should find this a little odd, especially considering that the media itself is largely owned by only a select group of corporations.
"True Detective" appears to shine light on a world most like to dismiss as "conspiracy theory" simply because they've been misinformed or would rather not believe such terrible things actually happen. The show is not based on fantasy at all. What it depicts is all too real and, as in the plot, it is consistently covered up.
"The State Attorney General and the FBI have discredited rumors that the accused was in some way related to the family of Louisiana Senator Edwin Tuttle."
"Go back to sleep.. Go back to sleep.."
Once you can move past the official story, it's time to start looking for likely suspects.
The evidence against Israeli Mossad and their diaspora is mounting.
>Did they make money off of it?
Approximately $300 billion within the first few weeks, an unknown number afterwards but likely at least as much after.
Here is an ok summary of the first part. Read both 1 & 2. You will need to do more research throughout the reading to understand the theft that took place.
Weltall82: ^^original ^^reddit ^^link
i'm a fan of para-politics, or para-political research, or deep politics. these at least are somewhat more likely to fetch curiosity about what that means, rather than triggering behavioral programming with "conspiracy theory".
>Peter Dale Scott employs the term "parapolitics," in a completely different manner, as a manifestation of "Deep Politics":
>"...the investigation of parapolitics, which I defined (with the CIA in mind) as a 'system or practice of politics in which accountability is consciously diminished.'...I still see value in this definition and mode of analysis. But parapolitics as thus defined is itself too narrowly conscious and intentional... it describes at best only an intervening layer of the irrationality under our political culture's rational surface. Thus I now refer to parapolitics as only one manifestation of deep politics, all those political practices and arrangements, deliberate or not, which are usually repressed rather than acknowledged."
>The term is used to describe either covert political activity that is hidden from the public or a complete (de facto) political system, typically comprising elements of the military and intelligence apparatus, hidden from the public; political actions of subterfuge, secrecy, and deceit; and is increasingly used in discussions on democracy to describe coalitions of institutions and corporations who operate above or outside of the elected government.
Actually, his handlers were responsible. George Bush couldn't plan his way through a Sunday stroll. Bush only did what he was told.
The correct answer: http://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it