What are /r/DimensionalJumping's favorite Products & Services?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

Let's ask him to create a stone that he cannot lift and see what happens.

Fun fact: in my language (French), "god" is pronounced the same as "gode" which means dildo. I think we've come full circle...

Proof: http://www.wordreference.com/enfr/dildo

I have indeed! Although I use them in a slightly different way, I find both "handle" and "felt-sense" good descriptive terms (better than previous terms, e.g. "sensory folds" and "explicated aspects", for general use).

His more in-depth book, <em>Focusing-Oriented Psychotherapy: A Manual of the Experiential Method</em>, is excellent, and his "process model" stuff is interesting. As I recall, he doesn't really explore the idea that this "global summary" is of the dissolved extended pattern of which specific sensory experiences are just the condensed aspects in the moment ("handles"), but his framework for experiential exploration is a great perspective on it.

Have you read Seth? He talks partially about the same kinds of things you describe:

• we each choose, in every moment, a probable present and a probable past

• a person who commits suicide can reverse it, erase memory, and continue as if nothing happened

• "Now, there will be no holocaust unless you believe that you are so evil that you, as a race must punish yourselves. But there will always be benign old spirits like me that tell you that, although you are bad, you are perfectly bad, and utterly beautiful, and nothing will destroy you unless you are convinced you are, as a race so evil you must be destroyed. And even then, only those who so believe will partake in that probability!" (here)

• We are constantly going outside of human formatting when we sleep, and even moment to moment as we exist; and we're not aware of it because it makes no sense in human formatting.

Yet, the world he describes has much much much more structure than this. Despite every person choosing their reality from moment to moment, we are still "caught" in a karmic cycle; it still makes sense to talk of other persons as separate. Consciousness gives birth to consciousness, etc.

In contrast, it seems to me you have a very single-layer conception of the whole thing.

Interestingly, the ideas you propose here are consistent with the writings of physicist Max Tegmark, which you perhaps may already know. However, he does not go so far as to suggest that it is a phenomenon that can be tested and/or manipulated. I.e. he proposes that the basic substance of our universe is a sort of mathematical object, but stops there and does not make the final step to equating that object with the Akashic Record.