What are /r/SimulationTheory's favorite Products & Services?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

Hey guys, just a quick PSA: YouTube are now reducing video recommendations on conspiracy theory videos, calling them “borderline content”. This is affecting 1% of all channels. Now while I don’t consider my Simulation Theory channel a “conspiracy theory”, they have stated that “flat earth type" videos etc are included. I can’t tell for sure if my own videos have been affected, but my most recent one (Episode #009) had far fewer views than normal and lower recommendations according to YouTube analytics.

Again, I can’t be certain if Simulation Theory content will be impacted – and YouTube won’t tell creators if our videos are affected – but unfortunately this uncertainty means I can’t justify committing as much time to drawing the original animations that I was planning on. The Animated Episodes were taking 5-10 hours to make, so now I will have to use glitch-style video recording instead which is still fun but far less resource heavy.

Don’t worry – I will still be putting Episodes out on YouTube, but my equal focus is now going to be on the Podcast https://anchor.fm/awlias too. I understand why YouTube are trying to stop the spread of misinformation, but I think we have to be careful that new ideas and different type of thinking is not harmed by this move.

Anyways thanks for all your support, and for those who enjoy my YouTube videos please subscribe if you haven’t already (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuzkSQTv7S5U30QsGPVHp3g) otherwise you may not get my simulation theory recommendations anymore. :(

Anyomne can take picture of a statue and create this kind of "coiuncidence " i think .

Here s thinking man

https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-photography-of-a-man-holding-ppen-1076801/

and a statue

https://wallpapercave.com/w/QWyIIv5

coincidence ?

You should check out this book

https://www.amazon.com/Game-Life-Book-ebook/dp/B009U5TCKU

It’s pretty much what you described. Could be a manual to the simulation?

What made you realise it’s not real?

I mean this is essentially true (well, not necessarily "programmed") but our brains give us a simplified hallucination to help us make sense of the world.. see https://smile.amazon.com/dp/B07NMRRJ48.

>Why we are in a simulation?

We don't know if we are in a simulation as we lack sufficient evidence and we cannot falsify it.

>you based your theory on what happend inside the theory.

What does this mean?

>So the idea came when it could be visualize inside the simulation...

What idea? The idea that we're in a simulation?

>And if we were living in a world where scientists experimenting brain in a box, so we would think that we are brain in a box?

I don't properly understand this part, but are you asking if we're in a simulation, would we think that we are a brain in a vat or something similar?

If so, us being in a simulation does not necessarily equal us thinking us to be in a sim.

If I did not understand what your question was, please explain it to me.

>Why the theory is based on the world technological development?

Are you referring to how the Simulation Argument bets on processing power increasing to make simulations more realistic?

If so, that's because to prove that we're in a sim, we need the ability to make realistic sims.

Some may counter this by claiming that we can create a sim by placing a consciousness in a Minecraft world (thus creating an unrealistic simulation). And they are right that a simulation does not have to be realistic to exist. However, to prove that we potentially are in one, we need to make a realistic simulation to prove that a life-like sim is possible.

If I misunderstood what you were referring to, please explain what you meant.

>Science teaches us that everything is made out of informations

Isn't everything made out of matter. If I'm wrong please explain why?

>that the universe is infinite (As far as we know)

From Wikipedia:

Because we cannot observe space beyond the edge of the observable universe, it is unknown whether the size of the Universe in its totality is finite or infinite.

However the rest of your post is pretty solid. That stuff about rendering only when we're looking is exact what I'd do if I were running a simulation.

For this week’s Episode we look at an exciting discovery back in 2014, by a small group of Quantum gravity researchers.

Watch: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZvEOROfy00Y

Listen: https://anchor.fm/awlias or your go to podcast player.

Please subscribe if you enjoy my little episodes and I’ll make some more!

https://www.ancestry.com/boards/topics.royalty.links/212/mb.ashx dont ask for proof then say its not true you come back with evidence proving its not true or dont come back and waste my fucking time, its hard to win an argument with a smart person, but its impossible to win a argument with a stupid person

Beginning is unsure. But one level up or some sort of thing can assume by these. I'm grad if these help a little bit.
　
Why Now? A Quest in Metaphysics - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29AgSo6KOtI
[PDF] On Singularities and Simulations | Semantic Scholar
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-Singularities-and-Simulations-Dainton/15219141829419dd89bdca96b6f6a8122ec83b27

I think absolute reality exists.
But we are maybe in this state.
[PDF] On Singularities and Simulations | Semantic Scholar
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-Singularities-and-Simulations-Dainton/15219141829419dd89bdca96b6f6a8122ec83b27
Dive into VR without real memory is such a high challenge, high risk if you can think normally.
So I think this reality(VR) is going to create singularity and VRs.
This one is highly calculated( or training program) or formulated before it started.
And this one is such a simulation without getting lost because of simulation technology isn't so high nor nomal.
We are pushed in because we can't escape this simulation. If simulation technique is capable in that world, we will end up escaping simulation and continuing.
So we are in this one(before simulation civilization). Are there any questions?
Except that, I don't know why we are here, why we are human, why we are reaching singularity, why we are live in 3,4D to 11D, why we are partially knowing universe and things, entire earth, why I exist as this? Entirely meaningful.
Real reality is highly distant, I speculate.

Very true but I thought there might be something between the game of life, universe simulator http://spaceengine.org/ and a full fledged earth simulation. So far the earth simulator is the closest thing I can find it is focused on weather and not life simulation.

This is the one I actually want which appears to be a failed kick starter project. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/crytivogames/the-universim

I will keep looking around. Just to be clear I realize that creating my own universe and being god of a full fledged earth will take at minimum a super computer if not a quantum computer I was just hoping there was something between the game of life and a complete simulation. Right now a simple game where micro-organisms could evolve and flourish would be awesome.

And I think you shall watch and read these.
　
Why Now? A Quest in Metaphysics - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29AgSo6KOtI
[PDF] On Singularities and Simulations - Semantic Scholar
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-Singularities-and-Simulations-Dainton/15219141829419dd89bdca96b6f6a8122ec83b27

I think all in all subjectivity matters.
And if this world is created by god/gods, they'll create more entertainment.
So, singularity matters.
My probability of being human is very very very extremely low, but I live as a human.
So, my subjectivity really matters.
Creating doomed simulation? What's the point?
I am a misery man but I live in Japan. It's somehow nice.
Also, you should read "Factfulness"(which I didn't read. hehe).
Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About the World--and Why Things Are Better Than You Think: Hans Rosling
https://www.amazon.com/Factfulness-Reasons-World-Things-Better/dp/1250107814
So, I believe we will be gods in this simulation.
I also note "We will be post-human.".
We will have singularity and Pareto improvement will go on until million years ahead. I could figure out the space will be much more explorable.
Sorry. I am the much more optimistic person in the world.