He's not wrong.
"Fetal macrosomia can be caused by genetic factors as well as maternal conditions, such as obesity or diabetes. Rarely, a baby might have a medical condition that speeds fetal growth"
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/fetal-macrosomia/symptoms-causes/syc-20372579
Take a look at entry 8 in this photoshop contest. http://www.pxleyes.com/blog/2010/08/pxleyes-top-50-pictures-from-the-photoshop-contests-of-july-2010/
>Contest goal:Many of us have seen chops of cars into miniature versions (as done so brilliantly by Solkee). The aim of this contest is to apply the same concept to an animal. As examples, you may choose to make a two legged dog or shorten a sausage dog. Make the chops as realistic as possible so it looks like this is the way the animal was born. Author: SOLARIS, created for: compact animals photoshop contest
It isn't. A fang is simply a tooth shaped like an animal's claw. It has no bearing on whether you can get an infection from the bite. There are times where a venomous snake won't even inject venom for a defensive bite called a 'dry bite' and even then you can get a nasty infection. Lizards can give you an infection as well.
Very interesting. What about boy cats I wonder. I have a fixed male cat that is going through it's teenage years (not a kitten, not an adult), and it is a good hunter. We made fun of it for trying to catch a fly and about 2 minutes later he snatched the thing out of thin air. Now he likes to sit outside on his leash and watch birds he can't get close enough to. There was this story about a new book a few months ago by an anthropologist and the author says since we domesticated Cats as pest control, that's still pretty much what they do. And they just see us as big stupid Cats.
No, you're wrong on all accounts.
To improvise, is to create or perform spontaneously or without previous preparation.
Having a routine directly contradicts the entire idea of improvisation.
I went and dug out one of the only Dene books that have lasted, it has history and stories. I got the stories oral when I was young. But I found this book maybe 20 years ago. It’s on Amazon. There is also a couple of writers that have series centered around the Dene nation. Tony Hillerman (tv show Dark Winds is based on his books) and R. Allen Chappell. Books entertaining and fairly authentic in the side details regarding culture and reservation life and hardships.
I hope I didn’t overwhelm or worse, disappoint you and I hope gave you some good directions to look in.
You seen those boob pillows? Here's a link.
https://www.amazon.com/Boobie-Artificial-Cushion-Ergonomic-Girlfriend/dp/B092M1W71K?th=1
Ha ha, very funny, right? Great gag gift, right? That's what I thought.
THAT IS THE MOST COMFORTABLE CUSHION FOR READING IN BED YOU CAN IMAGINE!!! Put it behind your neck and it holds your head PERFECTLY!
> ... toxin ...
I agree it's useful to have a word that means "poisonous only when delivered by some certain ways". But It seems really odd that scientists choose to re-define a good old word (poisonous) - perhaps at the same time as they invented a much newer newer word (toxin) to replace it, since they trampled on the original meaning? Though I note that "toxin" apparently means "organic poison" - and if you're saying venoms aren't poisons, maybe toxin isn't an appropriate word to use to describe a snake-byte-chemical either ....
TL/DR - it's more of a linguistic question - If "poison" had a long history of use as any chemicals capable of harming or killing, why did scientists choose to re-use that word for their more narrow definition and invent new words to match the original definition, instead of inventing a new word for for the narrow definition?
If you enjoy both fantasy and hummingbirds than you might enjoy this book https://www.amazon.com/Blood-Engines-Marla-Mason-Book-ebook/dp/B000WCWVIU
Unfortunately its not the exact same but like i said, its pretty similar. It was a budget mouse that I got for $9 USD