What are /r/badlegaladvice's favorite Products & Services?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

Oh boy, this is a rough one, and I'm sure I won't be able to point out all the issues with the lawsuit, but it's clear that whoever drafted this wasn't a lawyer. Here's a link to an article about the filing.

R2 (for a few of them):

• The suit argues that Bernie should be award all delegates due to the "Fruit of the Poisonous Tree" doctrine. That doctrine only applies to evidence gathered through illegally obtained information. One class in Crim Pro could have taught you this.

• Former President Clinton cannot be sued under section 1983, he's not a government actor and he wasn't acting under the authority of the Secretary of State, and Bill's actions weren't conferred onto him by the Secretary of State. A quick search on Google Scholar would have confirmed that is how this section works.

• The proof given is certainly underwhelming. The suit argues that disenfranchised voters could have swung the election, but only a poll is given to support this.

I'm not knowledgeable in election law, so I'm sure there's more about how they incorrectly write about state voting regulations as well as voter dilution itself.

He should have not jizzed in it, and instead just left this book lying around.

Natural Harvest: A Collection of Semen-Based Recipes

This one is pretty recent. Civil, not criminal, but hilarious. Guy is tired of neighbor's horse pooping on his lawn so he digs holes to "booby trap" it for the horse.

As planned, horse trips and gets hurt, neighbors threaten a civil suit, and the guy is in denial that booby trapping your lawn with the express intent to hurt a wandering pet may not be legally defensible.

Here's a mirror.

Apparently the source page has been removed! Oh well. (Not the article you've linked to, but the source that they in turn linked to)

Edit: There's an archive of another version of the original here.

I would suggest that between Rooke, albeit Canadian, and Posner, you can cover a whole lot of it.

>Purely for my own amusement, I wish one of these people would release a commentary on the constitution....

If you're interested, apparently they use the Constitution as annotated by W. Cleon Skousen. It's available on Amazon for a dollar.