From left to right ;P
The blue links are the same. Notice the via @roolsbot part of his and mine message? That means that the message was created using an inline bot (A telegram feature, see here). This specific bot lets you search for these links and also, in a more advanced way, let you insert these links naturally in your messages without you knowing the actual link, you just search for keywords basically. I tried to "show off" using this advanced mechanic to combine the two messages he had to send (because he only used the basic function of the bot) into one, using this advanced technique. And he then told me that he wrote this feature.
Sounds complicated? Dont worry, it is. I hope I could explain it though :)
> I'm not sure you're trolling, but you do realize she is the one who created the characters. She is the one who knows them.
this matters a lot less than you think.
there are many instances of a book - or characters from a book - taking on new meaning the author didn't intend.
perfect case in point; Fahrenheit 451.
everyone on the planet agrees that this book is a harsh indictment of governmental censorship and a state with too much power gone completely amock - except for Ray Bradbury, who insists the book is about "television turning people into morons."
Ray Bradbury - who of course wrote the fucking thing - has been told to his face multiple times that his intended message is wrong because the accepted message is far more obvious, relevant and fitting.
Snape is the same. he's taken on a life of his own beyond his creator's obvious intention, and while she may have her own opinion about his motivations, she gave the audience enough information to draw our own conclusions.
that regional body is so fine.
though tbf everyone seems to think macroeconomics operates intuitively and that because they took home ec in highschool they know how everything works.
I’m pretty sure I read a comic about this in The Big Book of Urban Legends as a kid, and that was published in 95. The story itself is probably much older.
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Book-Urban-Legends-Stories/dp/1563891654
Well, maybe. A hell of a lot of otherwise smart people don't understand probability properly. Aubrey Clayton recently wrote an excellent book on the phenomenon.
Can never go wrong with a good lesson from Big Money himself. I’ve been watching Nobbleberry with his NordVPN code so I can stay away from Ted Cruz’s death squadron of evil bird robots that try to steal my browser history
openSSH vulnerabilities:
> January 14, 2016 OpenSSH clients between versions 5.4 and 7.1 are vulnerable to information disclosure that may allow a malicious server to retrieve information including under some circumstances, user's private keys. This may be mitigated by adding the undocumented config option UseRoaming no to ssh_config. For more information see CVE-2016-0777 and CVE-2016-0778.
Also, you are not getting my point: If you have a complex system, with multiple dependencies and multiple vendors that you can't fully control, and a couple of thousand people working on those systems, it is too hard or too expensive to reach full 100% security. Someone who promises either a) 100% uptime or b) 100% security obviously doesn't know what he/she is talking about.
The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters https://www.amazon.com/dp/0190865970/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_WTVRY2NDDJ4ZNVEWG86H
You’re right. I’m not used to people reading my comments necessarily but it’s a good habit to get into if and when I recommend books
Edit: spelling
They made a comic called "The Star Wars" based on his original script. It was entertaining, but had a very 70s Flash Gordon feel. Nothing that would have survived the ages like Star Wars has. Whoever doctored his scripts, deserves all the credit.
https://smile.amazon.com/dp/1783294981/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_ELTfFb1K255QW
Not true, like I said there are blockchains specialized to do this that are actually up and running. This isn't some theoretical discussion, what I'm saying is demonstrably proven. Examples are Filecoin and Sia. You can read the technical whitepapers here:
The guy making the claim was just puffing up baselessly.
The shot mentioned was taken in December 5th, of 2016. and, through the magic of archived weather data we can see the low that day was 21, with a high of 32.
The person who's the fool here is the one OP up-voted. Moral of the story: Don't lie when empiric data can easily prove you false.
Nah you are just being an idiot, this is literally a photo of Sandra with her parents. https://www.shutterstock.com/editorial/image-editorial/mulatto-official-classification-london-united-kingdom-england-7363733a
Here is another article about her https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/jan/24/chrismcgreal
It is rare, sure but to act as if it cant or doesnt happen is laughable. You should find a mirror so you can laugh at yourself.
Smarter than the dingus tweeting on behalf of the ICF, who not only utterly failed to get Weinstein's analogy, but also apparently doesn't understand what happens when you play Queen versus Pawns.
Alongside Plex I have a number of other programs that handle media management. Some of which include:
Sonaar - TV show management
Radaar - Movie management
Jackett - Torrent/Usenet indexer
DelugeVPN - Torrent downloader with VPN
SABnzbdVPN - Usenet downloader with VPN
After making an account on trakt.tv you can plug in your trakt list(s) into ~~Sonaar and~~ Radaar and they will look for those titles for you. Trakt has "popular" and "trending" lists you can add or you can make a custom list of things you want to see.
Radarr uses Jackett to find available torrents/usenet files. Then sends that info to Deluge (if torrent) or SABnzbd (if usenet). Once completed Radarr will grab the completed download, rename it so Plex understands it and moves it to the library folder.
Definitely look into getting a Usenet account somewhere, you'll find alot more stuff available.
I'm just a software dev and no expert on ML/AI but most likely not, no, for reasons you described yourself. There are too many variables to take into consideration and for most models you need some type of fitness i.e. a goal for the AI to move towards. In this case you'd define fitness as "how funny", which doesn't really have any type of metric you can attach to and is clearly hard for even known writers and comedians, let alone ordinary people, to get right. If you could somehow train the model and give it feedback on what's funny, it could likely compile a list of clips it thinks would be the funniest based on that feedback, but there's way too many factors and inputs you're asking for it to generate something like this on its own.
AI models right now can be very good at very specific things in a narrow field, the type of thing you're describing seems to be more in line with an AGI, artificial general intelligence, which we're still super far from achieving (relatively speaking).
And as far as chess/ML/AI goes, then technically most AI doesn't really rely on if/else decisions, rather than massive amounts of data and the input weights to determine its success in any given position, much like a human would. The early versions of computerized chess tried determining something like 1000 times more positions than current state AI/ML systems, which blow the early versions out of the water. There's a great article everyone can understand on chess.com about AlphaZero: https://www.chess.com/article/view/how-does-alphazero-play-chess
Again, I'm no expert on these subject and it's just based on my limited research/watercooler talk with guys who know more about this than I do, but it's pretty fascinating regardless of knowledge level.
I'm also trying to understand what Megascans are - I googled it and ended up at this site, where the top image is the exact same one that is being shared in the origial tweet and now I'm even more confused.
https://lbry.com/faq/lbry-name
They don't really say.
Seven letters would be unusually long for the protocol part of a URI, so I can understand why it is shortened to lbry for practical reasons.
Of course there's a hefty dose of Web 2.0 marketing mixed in, too.
We had a rocking swing thing and a [door bouncy thing](Bright Starts, Door Jumper - Bounce 'n Spring Deluxe https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B016OOD6XI/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_glt_fabc_SYEBSDK4K9E3978TZWN0) , they were both excellent at getting him to sleep, he definitely has his moments and when he was about 18 months he went through a stage of not sleeping unless I got on the bed with him, but that was fine, I was usually asleep before he was lol
Are you using the shitty official Reddit app? If so, switch to something good like Sync and enjoy Reddit with a great UI and functionality.
"New Book '' Penultimate Hustle: Japan
Book Now Available On Amazon.
Purchase Now
Please click on the link below to know about this buy
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B008ZSW67Y/
#books #bookstagram #book #booklover #reading #bookworm #bookstagrammer #bookish #read #booknerd #bookaddict #bibliophile #booksofinstagram #instabook
The guy who does the “crime a day” account has a how to book!
Surprised that people didn’t catch that, but I guess you have to be a person of culture to be familiar with the author of Helicopter Man Pounds Dinosaur Billionaire Ass