What is Reddit's opinion of Gickr?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

I didn't notice how bad the original photo looked until seeing your touch-up. Here's a comparison for anyone who's interested

EDIT: jim-_- alerted me to his alternate fix. New gif here

Also, darkmooninc, NOW she looks like she's at a terrible rave: Link

Wow. I can't believe I've never seen that picture before. That's got to be one of my favorites, the crop/edit/frame of it perfect and Ware looks like a lion or tiger that just started it's lunge for the kill.

Here is a 2-frame animated picture I stitched together, that shows how good Ware's first step was. In this preseason game he was wrongly called for offsides.

He is already exploding off the line by the time the ball moves, and no one besides the center and QB moved on the Bengals side.

The LiveJournal community discovered this years ago (you know, when LiveJournal was still a thing). It's a Mexican thing, apparently, so naturally things like this and this happened (the links referred to have long since been broken, sadly).

Figured would try to switch back and forward between those two images from the thread. Does not seem like glitch or photoshop since water texture affects it.

Made a gif to see if anyone else sees something I don't.

http://gickr.com/results3/anim_8bdb9857-aef4-7eb4-d596-ebf12f21bb1b.gif

looks photoshopped take a look at the "free speech unit", there's some color fringing around it. there may have been some sort of bumper sticker there before it was photoshopped.

http://gickr.com/results3/anim_8c9eeaa3-1d6a-8094-d9ea-1c8a80c3e010.gif

I only downvoted you because I have seen this GIF posted every couple of days in this subreddit.

Its a great GIF, one of the better reaction GIFS I have ever seen, but I'm getting tired of seeing it over and over. Maybe if possible make some OC? Even if you don't get the flair, you would be injecting new life blood into the system. A system that stagnates and stops evolving: dies. I don't want that to this subreddit. This is possibly my favorite subreddit, but reposts run rampant on here. Reposts in themselves are not bad. But if everybody is just using the same 20 GIFs for everything, we are gonna get bored and leave. When that happens this subreddit will die. I don't want that to happen. /r/reactiongifs is amazing, be a part of the solution, not the problem.

Here are two websites that are simple and are used to make GIFs. I know its a lot of work, but it will be worth it.

http://picasion.com/ http://gickr.com/

awesome I cried a little. mostly because my dogs name is <strong>Bleux</strong> and <strong>she</strong> looks a decent amount like your Blue.

I haven't tried any of these yet, but these three look promising:

Glickr

Picasion

Make a gif

Have fun with the new ways to make sexiness, sweets! <3

Some phones have an animation that fills the bar as it charges on loop, this is one of those cases.

Sort of like this.http://gickr.com/results4/anim_eaccb534-1b58-ec74-697d-cd082c367a25.gif

Oh, wow, thanks for sharing. That submission has comments with two other animated versions.

But then if you look at their time stamps, it doesn't make sense in terms of how complex they are (of course, most likely each poster went their own way and came back about an hour later).

I can't be the only one who instantly heard the kirk/spock fight scene music in my head. relevant

Not anymore, though it's a pretty good description of my husband (at the Indy hub). He's working DG now though, so not driving as much.

Also, relating to your other comment reply about non-cons weeding out weaker people--As a 5'7 120lb woman who worked in non-cons through my whole pregnancy up to the night before I gave birth, I scoff at these weak ones dropping out. Deal With It!

I'm no expert but I don't think so. Did the resize and overlay as requested.

• Couldn't get the two to match pixel to pixel, there was ghosting because the distances between features are not the same, nor is it simple stretch operation (it could be multiple localised stretches though)

There are also significant differences that show they are not the same image, imho.

• Eyes are different as already mentioned by other redditors

• Dent in join of headband and hat top LHS, not in photo

• Small bead/stitch in seam of headband over his left eye in photo not in painting

• Seam of the headband as it wraps on itself not the same (it puckers up in the photo and is flat in the painting)

• Small dent in crown of hat in painting is not in photo

• Seam detail on the jacket collar not the same

• Collar/buttonhole detail not the same

• Detail of the topology (bumps) of the left jacket collar is widely inconsistent

• Geometry of his right ear does not match

• Background blurred images are similar but not the same

• Marks and mottling in textures are not the same (e.g: headband centre, the wear on the jacket collar, reflectivity around the shoulder, etc)

Could it have been processed, resized, stretched and then 'shopped? Certainly.

It's either an excellent copy by hand, or a lot of work to fake a copy by hand.

You be the judge

*original picture! by Sergi Reboredo

*side by side!

*.gif!