Just a suggestion - the website paletton has a colourblind filter setting so you can see how different colour combinations look - might be helping with choosing colours for this!
https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/ssl/what-is-an-ssl-certificate/
i think this can explain it better than most people on here (including me obv), but TLDR its basically a certificate that a website has that contains a bunch of info that tells whatever is on the receiving end of it that its legit
Actually it's a very clearly cut legal case; The footer of the SCP wiki clearly states:
"Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License"
If we then look at the terms of that licence:
You are free to: Share Adapt Under the following terms: Attribution ShareAlike
Thus provided that netflix stated at some point during the episode that it was writen by [Username here], and they allow sharealike and adaptation, then they are entirely in their legal right to do so.
The creator said he had to slow the pace of production down because it wasn't sustainable and he had to pay more attention to events in his personal life. He talks about it here:
He put up a Patreon page so that people could support the project and he could dedicate more time to it. You can check it out here: https://www.patreon.com/theFoundationGame?ty=h
Nvm you can find them on amazon as well
​
https://www.amazon.com/Foundation-Secure-Contain-Protect-Kniga/dp/5913396189
Well, this is going to be commercial, the CC-BY-SA 3.0/4.0 license does not effect that. You can read our FAQ for more info. :)
Early Access/public Alpha is planned for mid next year. We expect full release to hit its mark by 2020 at the earliest, and 2022 at the latest. Once the full release hits, the game will be free to play.
Site rules, the author or admins will just revert it to what the author put, and warn the person who altered it without the author's permission.
If you actually read the Creative Commons Licence that applies to SCP, you'll notice that the author still owns the copyright for the work, they just give an open licence for anyone to share or create adaptions of the work as long as they credit the author.
So yea, an author can do whatever they want with their SCP, but others can't come along and change it without permission.
Multi packs from Hanes or something. You can sometimes find them at Khols or other discount stores, but you can also get them from Amazon
Gildan Men's Crew T-Shirt 6 Pack, White, Small https://www.amazon.com/dp/B077ZCT9SS/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_ynraDbDDH4TEB
Several points under CC-BY-SA 3.0, when combined, make it incredibly difficult to monetize.
First, derivative works must be released under the same license. (Viral License, 4(b)(i))
Second, the license explicitly forbids any sort of DRM. (4(b)(IV))
Third, the licensor (e.g., the producer of SCP The Movie) grants you unfettered, perpetual, royalty-free distribution rights. (3, 3(a))
http://www.scpcbgame.com/scp-087-b.html
Second, much better game. I recommend playing it in a dark room with headphones on. It's very ambient horror. The SCP Foundation website actually got a lot of exposure due to this game, since it attracted a bunch of LPers like Pewdiepie.
here are the links to the cloak and mask! sorry those are the only things i bought, or i would provide more
https://www.amazon.com/Disguise-Costumes-Silver-Venetian-Adult/dp/B002JVDMBM/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?keywords=049+scp&qid=1563338576&s=gateway&sprefix=049+&sr=8-3 https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B07BVLKYH2/ref=cts_ap_2_vtp?ie=UTF8&pi=SL110&dpPl=1&dpID=31GFkhV-HNL
Here is the one I use. The proper name of these long-beaked masks is a zanni mask from Commedia dell'arte, making it a little more difficult to find than the shorter plague doctor masks.
Note that the mask is traditionally only a half mask. For my cosplay version, I took a wide isosceles triangle of black cotton and stapled it around the lower edge to hide the rest of my face, though glue might work as well. Another wide strip of the same material pasted around the top edge should cover your forehead too if you need it.
Yup, this one, precisely.
The random button and the "mark as read" feature made it very convenient, but it has a "payoff" as it tends to show a buggy version of some of the articles: strikethrough text appear as normal, tables are never shown (a huge drawback for SCPs like 1733) and special SCPs doesn't appear at all.
If you can deal with it, though, I can recommend it. I just can't switch to any other SCP reader app.
I messaged the mods before posting this and I think I’m following all the rules and doing this right. Here goes: Credit for the logo itself goest to the SCP Wiki, and I have created this piece under the Creative Commons License (CC-BU-SA for short found here
Please let me know if I botched that.
Basically everything on the wiki (Except 173's likeness) is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike. You just have to give proper credit, in the form of links to any articles referenced or used as inspiration, and you must release your work under the same license.
It's under a creative commons, except where otherwise noted (ie 173's image is a copyrighted artwork, but the text of the article is free to use) meaning anyone can distribute, copy, reuse the material, even commercially, as long as credit is given.
The problem with making an expensive adaptation such as a film/tv show is that when you reuse the creative commons material you must follow the same licence as the original work, which seems to me like a TV show of a creative commons work must then also be a creative commons work, and then you've got an expensive project with no copyright control.
For projects made for artistic purposes or nonprofit project that's not an issue, for a hollywood or TV network production, or any other for-profit they would probably want to play it safe with a similar but copyrightable content.
edit; here is the creative commons license summary: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Almost. Lands are colorless so if you hit even a single land, the entire thing grinds to halt.
However, there are ways to get around this, and one of them was conveniently reprinted in the previous set:
It's a linear walking game (think linear RPG, or google that if you haven't heard of it). You're supposed to run to the 'end' down the stairs. The face (different from the original SCP) will appear and possibly harm you. You have to avoid it by walking away and looking/not looking a certain way. It appear very rarely. The biggest fear element is the repetitive darkness and the knowledge that there will be something unpleasant to break that repetition that you've become accustomed to.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/
To be honest we're not going to send a SWAT team for someone making an offline/printed copy. To keep things proper and stress-free, I would insert something along these lines on the first page.
> All contained works are via the SCP Wiki.
> scp-wiki.net
> Licensed CC-BY-SA 3.0
> creativecommons.org
The SCP wiki is not in the public domain. The CC-BY-SA 3.0 license is significantly different from the public domain - it requires attribution and it requires that derivative works be released under CC-BY-SA 3.0 themselves, among other things.
The original photo wasn’t CC compliant so they had to change it. The person in the photo is Yukki, an SCP cosplayer. This wiki really seems to be finally changing the pictures of the more popular SCPS, hopefully this doesn’t go through another 106 incident
How*?
https://www.rainmeter.net/ First, you download Rainmeter.
Then you download a skin you like (I linked the one I used above)
Then you edit it however you like, and run it alongside a desktop background with the SCP logo.
https://imgur.com/a/7oGsdiN The background I used.
Ah, the author is FortuneFavoursBold. And like I said, XACTS prevent time fuckery across an area. From the entry:
> The Xyank/Anastasakos Constant Temporal Sink (XACTS) is a device designed to stabilize the flow of causality across a given field of effect. XACTS’s use high-power electromagnetic radiation in the radio band coupled with a tachyon field emitter [2] to create a permeable event-boundary, allowing organic and electrical systems to pass through unaffected while maintaining a static causal environment. In other words, temporal anomalies which might normally prevent SCP-2000 from being constructed will have no effect, so long as at least one XACTS remains in operation. There are no plans to implement Foundation-wide use of XACTS devices.
So it maintains a stable flow of time, and blocks out temporal effects allowing living things and electrical systems to function normally. So, for example, it could no sell whatever caused 176.
Everyone and no one. Content on the wiki (with a few very important exceptions) is covered by the Creative Commons Share-alike.
Here's a human-readable summary of a version of the license, and here is the wiki's licensing guide page.
In short, anyone can make and sell anything SCP related... but in doing so anyone else can copy what they make and sell it cheaper, repeat as needed. There's simply no money to be made in large-scale SCP projects, even disregarding snarls like 173 et. al.
I have not played it, so I don't know if it's good but someone made an SCP-087 game http://www.scpcbgame.com/scp-087-b.html. Also there seems to be a Russian short film about SCP-087 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5203476/?ref_=tt_rec_tti
If you Google for examples of real world "classified" documents that should give you some nice reference material. If you don't have Photoshop, there are a ton of decent & free graphic editors you can use, like PhotoPea for example.
Looks like a part of the site CSS didn't get loaded. If a force refresh (Ctrl+Shift+R) doesn't fix this then this is likely because some sort of web filter or an extension like Privacy Badger is blocking too much.
Another possibility is that the wiki's host is just having a hiccup and it should get back to normal in maybe 15 minutes or so.
╭╴<strong>S</strong>pace <strong>C</strong>olonazation <strong>P</strong>rocceses╶╮
It seems to be a problem on their end. I just downloaded it last night, but today I'm getting 404 from the link.
Not Found
The requested URL /SCP - Containment Breach v0.2.1.zip was not found on this server.
http://www.datafilehost.com/download-c9026103.html
Uploaded it for you. Not sure if this filehost is any good, but its 100% free with no bs. I'm kind of new at this reddit posting, so it's all crunched together. Any idea how to add a newline character?
I just have to say, holy fuck am I excited for this. Like, I am what you could call a nega-fan of the existing fangames. It's neat they exist, they bring traffic to the wiki, but as actual games they are... not good. This actually looks like it could end up a quality product that actually reflects the wiki.
I might recommend you submitting these as actual links rather than self-posts. Last week you did a self-post, and then someone else just linked to the video directly, and it seemed to get a fair more amount of attention on the subreddit. Could just throw what you normally have in the self-post within the video description. Just food for thought.
Also- If you ever need help from someone with some actual onsite experience, feel free to PM me on the wiki or on Reddit. I'd be happy to answer questions or help with writing bits, and I know a couple other experienced contributors who'd probably love to help as well.
Can't you just use a wikidot css module? It works fine in the sandbox, at least.
You can also use javascript modules, like in the test i did here.
>/x/ isn't a hivemind though
Exactly. Which is why I sort of get skeptical when someone's making that broad claim when I don't even think Moto42 (guy who authored SCP-173) is on wikidot at all now. It's like chasing phantoms except what we're "supposed" to chase is some form of heraldry that has since moved on with their lives. Or not. Hard to prove without consensus and even then we run into the issue of /x/'s anonymity.
My issue is that this all could've been contemplated and circumvented somewhat by simply asking creators for input. But the conspiratorial nature + lack of evidence despite the ability to gather your own interviews or msges, really made me distrust the original source. I do see your point obviously. I don't even know if Gears knows about what's going on or has any input on it. Well, what's your thoughts on the whole situation at hand?
Yeah. That was the only thing I agreed upon from the video. It was borderline outlandish. But it seems like you guys are addressing it. Was wondering, did you guys take a hit to viewership or did the video ironically increase viewership sort of so new people can check out what all the fuss is about?
Definitely seeing SCP 2721 getting downvote spammed now. Not necessarily out of proper critique either if it's due to the rush.
>degradation of djkaktus's name
Wups. I-uh. Typing in darkness and dyslexia.
EDIT: Though I would like to make clear, obviously the start of all this was due to poor banning and transparency. The rest boiled into this, but that is a clear startpoint for this drama.
This is a T-Shirt I made a while back. Yes, I have looked at the licensing, this is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0, and SCP-049 was made by Gabriel Jade. You can get this T-Shirt on Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01M0M5LYC
Please, as much as I love reading the SCP Foundation E-Book, I can't read it all. If there is an SCP that you would like me to design a t-shirt for, please ask.
What do you know, graphic design is also my passion!
Also, side note, the font you're using (Lulo Clean, I believe) is very similar to another font, Raleway. Raleway is Open Source, though, which would align a lot closer with the spirit of the SCP-Wiki.
Montserrat is also really close in all caps, but I personally prefer Raleway.
Don't take my word for it, read the license yourself
I am not a lawyer, but I think the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike license (which SCP-1730 is licensed under, which would then apply to this work as well) actually overrides your decision, as derivative works of a work licensed under the CC BY-SA must also be licensed under the CC BY-SA, which allows commercial use. If commercial use was not desired, the SCP website (the original source of the content) would have had to have used the Noncommercial version (CC BY-NC-SA), or one of the Creative Commons project's other Noncommercial licenses.
They're still required to give credit to you, and to the SCP community and /u/djKaktus though.
Don't take my word for it, read the license yourself: CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported License, for reference
That's true legally speaking. Everything submitted to the wiki is licensed under creative commons. This license is irrevocable (mentioned on this page), so you don't have any options if someone decides to post it somewhere. (As long as they're following the license rules, i.e. crediting you and releasing derivative works under the same license.)
However, the SCP wiki has a site policy of allowing authors to remove their work - they could allow others to re-upload, but they choose not to. Someone could still make a mirror for deleted articles, though. (archive.org works pretty well for this already)
(No idea why you got downvoted so badly.)
Ah, thanks for the heads up:
The Site-42 Teespring Store has shirts, hoodies, coffee mugs, and stickers with art by SCP fans and other friends of mine I commissioned to make SCP things. It also helps us build our budget toward making live-action SCP films.
Volgun and Toadking Studios also have SCP stuff in their merch shops as well. Support SCP Creators, yo!
> and you expect them not to get any cent for their hardwork to give some entertainment in your life.
It's not that he expects that. It's that this is the truth of the situation. The SCP foundation is under the Creative Commons - Attribution - Share Alike 3.0 license. As soon as you put the name "SCP" on the thing, it's 100% legal to copy and distribute the material, with or without permission, for free. All they have to do is cite you and your team as the creators (if you have credits at the end of the episode, this is done for them), and scp-wiki.net as the original source material.
No one wants to steal your product, but if you move forward, you have to understand that anti-piracy laws don't apply to it.
There is already an SCP-087 game that is pretty much the exact same as PT. I'll give you the SCB-087B version as I think it's the definitive version.
Great idea, though items a little short for a full SCP in my opinion, unless you can spice it up a little bit. In my opinion, the best way to spice up an idea is to give a test log, because you know the foundation is gonna test this shit. Another way to spice it up is to modify how it works. With all due respect, some people will find 9.8m per second boring. Make it act like the Fulton from Metal Gear Solid V and oh fuck yes we've got ourselves a winner. Specifically, the scp works like a Fulton, but remains attached to whomever is wearing it. Once the victim goes airborne their body begins inflating like a balloon and they stabilize at a height of (whatever you want) and their chest cavity/stomach becomes as round as a beach ball. Once stabilization is achieved and the victim expires (whether through G forces, the altitude, their chest being ballooned, etc.) The hat just drops off like a normal hat and falls slowly and gently back to earth, always landing right side up. Our victim will remain airborne for the next 24-48 hours, depending on wind and weather conditions, as well as how fat they got, with their body's orfices slowly leaking air at a rate far slower than they should given the pressure difference.
That's just my idea. Hit me up if you want to do this like a full on collaboration SCP. Stockform is the name. If not, feel free to use 100% of this. We are all in public domain land here. Happy writing.
Here the user says that on the wiki he's "Dr_Anderson", the profile of the user reveals that he page existed maybe about a day in September of 2012 and sadly I can't see any snapshots of that article in the time this version existed.
>Isn't Japan publishing scp light novels?
Is that a thing?? I live in Japan and would love to buy one
Edit: Found this (Amazon JP link)
>「鏡の国のアイリス -SCP Foundation-」
>Iris of the Country of Mirrors: SCP Foundation
Release date August 31, 2018, paperback
MSRP ¥1,296 ($11.77USD)
The name is a reference to the Japanese title to Through the Looking-Glass, and What Alice Found There (「鏡の国のアリス」, Alice of the Country of Mirrors), the 1871 sequel to the original Alice in Wonderland novel
I also found a book called <em>Insane 3: Insane SCP</em> released in March 2016 but I don't know what it's about. It's categorized under "Game & Strategy Guides" so it doesn't appear to be a manga
If you are talking about this book for sale on Amazon, I'm afraid we cannot answer this question. There are a lot of SCP books out there and the SCP Wiki is not affiliated with any of them. Your best bet would be contact the publisher.
There is only one book, but since there is a "1" on the cover, I think there will be more.
I bought the book here on Amazon.
King's alcohol and drug addictions were so serious during the 1980s that, as he acknowledged in On Writing in 2000, he can barely remember writing Cujo. wiki
I was using this for Android. It has offline, which is awesome for those of us who want to read SCP on commutes that don't have consistent signal.
But the developer hasn't updated it since April ~~2005~~ 2015 and the pictures don't load anymore. There are other apps, but this one was arguably the best. Now that it has janked, I'm going to be installing them all to see what's the best of the rest.
Edit: That... was a weird mental typo to make.
You can find the basic controls here: http://www.indiedb.com/games/the-foundation/news/the-foundation-prototype-release
I don't have a how-to up yet, but I will definitely make some once there is actual gameplay. For now its more of a collection of visual pieces to experiment with. Also I would love to hear more details about your confusion as it may be helpful to me for making things better.
Hey JS, I added this text to the sticker:
SCP-049 The plague doctor is based on “SCP-049” Written by Gabriel Jade. Rewritten by djkaktus: http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-049
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/).
Just dug up a discussion on Stack Exchange on this subject, the administrators of that site seem pretty confident that once a post is posted under CC-BY-SA deletion is no longer at the discretion of the original poster.
The summary of CC-BY-SA itself says:
> You are free to:
> Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
> [...]
> The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
With the license terms being the attribution and share-alike clauses. So the CC-BY-SA license explicitly says that the licensor cannot revoke the freedoms it allows, and one of the freedoms it allows is to copy and redistribute the material.
I think the legal side of this is very clear, the SCP wiki doesn't have to allow Von Pincier to delete his stuff. It's just non-binding policy to allow it, which could theoretically be changed any time.
Other people can repost and remix it freely without any legal restraint.
I though it was a decent take on the Humanity Is Infectious trope. The satellite also had body dysmorphia, which is different than being trans.
It might be this Roblox version of SCP: Containment Breach, which is a survival-horror game set in a facility that holds various fictional creatures and objects, many of which are hostile.
You can call it an "unknown cognito-hazard, possibly memetic in nature" then. I don't know if I would write him as sociopathic/psychopathic in nature if he revels in the effect he has on others. Here's the mayo clinic page on ASPD. It may be that he is more actively malicious with a bit of NPD.
Per the creator of https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/, images created by that site should be attributed to Phil Wang, CC 0.
╭╴ʀᴀɴᴅᴏᴍ ʟɪɴᴋ: ᴛʀᴀᴠᴇʟ ɪꜱ ɪɴᴇᴠɪᴛᴀʙʟᴇ,╶╮
I think that under the creative commons you can make the movie, but you would have to put in credit to the original creators. I don't think that it would necessarily mean that the movie you make would immediately fall under creative commons. I'm not too sure, but you can check out the scp CC license here
> as its content is neccessarily in the public domain, it cannot be monetized in any way (at least, I think that's ow it works - feel free to correct me)
Not at all correct. The wiki is licensed CC-BY-SA 3.0 which allows for monetization, but also requires that you release your work under the same license which can be adapted or built on with no monetization. No studio would touch that deal.
Good question. Every year since 2014, the SCP Foundation staff have conducted a survey of the SCP Community. The data collected in these surveys, and used in this chart, represents the composition of the community in the stated year. (In other words, it includes people who joined in all years up to the year of the survey). The surveys are conducted around May or June of the listed year, so the 2017 survey does in fact measure the community in 2017 (this is not the type of survey where there is a year-long gap between the survey being held and published).
In regards to the YouTube vides, Markiplier, who is responsible for about half of all YouTube recruitments, primarily produces let's play of Containment Breach. In the actual survey, Markiplier is listed under the YouTube category (a decision reflected in my graph), although it would probably be more accurate to think of his channel as a hybrid game/YouTube video category since it doesn't cleanly fit into either category. I talk more about this here.
This is the only other SCP game I know of off the top of my head, although there are certainty more out there. That being said, the overwhelming majority of SCP video game recruitments come from Containment Breach.
There is a website called rasterbator that does this exact thing. You can scale it to whatever size and it will even over print the edges so when you go to cut the borders off it won't matter if the line is not straight.
I could try to describe it, but go here and upload a random picture http://exif.regex.info/exif.cgi . If you are a touch paranoid about the website datamining you or something, may I suggest a free stock picture of a cat that was the first result from google??
after looking at the EXIF, you'll hopefully now realize most of the information is pretty dry, basic stuff. Now, give the picture from SCP-106 a try in the EXIF analyzer.
Now we're cookin with gas! Far more information about this mysterious picture! We know when the old man was photographed, with what camera, whether the flash was on, and that it was photoshopped on a mac a year or so after being taken!
But... no location. At that time GPS enabled cameras were few and far in between. What this information is useful for is photographers looking over their photos, and people wanting to make a database sort the info. If you downloaded that man.jpg, you'll notice that sorting by date in the folder puts it quite low. Because your OS read that data. This information can also assist police, and internal developers in debugging their cameras. Most importantly, this data is easily and cheaply attached to an image (in terms of processing and memory), So why not include it? Barring GPS which can be disabled, do you really care if people know you had the flash on or the beach pictures were taken at 11:39.59 am and most of the default settings are still in place?
Its like how modern cars have a blackbox recorder similar to airplanes. If you crash, there is a dump of information that your insurance company will want to look over.
The author explains it in a comment in the discussion that I'll copy here:
>!The "Black Forest Specimen" from the first Nazi memo was a living biomechanical spaceship; if you've ever seen the show Farscape, think of the Leviathans from that. It thought our solar system seemed interesting and came to take a look, and one of the first things it chose to investigate was Jupiter's Great Red Spot. This led to its unfortunate run-in with 2399, and the BFS just barely escaped. Radio signals from Earth clued it in to the fact that a technological civilization existed here, so it limped its way over to us and crash-landed in Germany in the early-mid 1930s. That's when the Nazis found it and poked it with sticks until they figured out how to attach jumper cables to the alien and use it to power a giant battleship. The mutagen that makes the -1 instances is "Compound 17", a failed super-soldier serum. Most of the Bismarck's crew and the BFS were exposed to the entire remaining supply during that final battle, causing them (along with any unfortunate marine life nearby) to fuse together into 4217-B. The biomechanical nature of the BFS further allowed this amalgam to fuse to the Bismarck itself, resulting in the new SCP-4217. This transformation took place over the course of a few decades, during which time it slept on the ocean floor. 4217 has the memories of the alien, sailors, and fish that it was made of, but these pieces were… poorly assembled. I tried to make its dialogue reminiscent of an ape using sign language, because that's about the level of intelligence it's operating on. On top of that, all of these conflicting memories that it doesn't fully understand result in what is essentially a case of Dissociative Identity Disorder. Hostile states are when it switches to "Nazi Mode" and its instincts drive it to perform the mission assigned to the Bismarck: Hunting and sinking Allied shipping vessels.!<
You should check out this site: https://prezi.com/m/xyn4krle5eug/the-physics-of-concussions/ I think you may need to increase the force used to cause a concussion. Besides that, I would uncensor the last one a bit (you don’t have to be explicitly but you should give some details) and have an Ethics Council inquiry if it was something heinous.
Besides that, the changes definitely improved the article.
Hey y'all!
Just wanted to update everyone on a new venture I'm working on. As alot of you know I am currently working on a SCP paperback/ebook/audiobook series. Well I have received so much support from the community that I've also decided to start making paperbacks/ebooks out of the SCP tales archives.
Note, I'm not making any profit from these and any royalties are going to the creation and cost of production for more SCP paperbacks and e-books. I'm also going to be using this as an opportunity to keep expanding the SCP-Pooleverse.
Please keep a weather eye out for some more covers for the third book in the J.Poole series and for the sequel series to be coming out soon.
Amazon link for this book
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0955N47G3/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_glt_fabc_D09D29TZM2YTX1XJGD2X
Limited quantities when printed + sought after art book = high prices
The local library in my area had a copy in 2014 though and I was able to check it out. It's a really interesting book to look through. Not sure I'd want to buy a copy for myself though.
Edit: TIL it was reprinted in 2013. It was released for the first time in 1981
Oh, I just downloaded a free model and basically massacred it. I wouldn't advise you use this one, tbh, it'd be a devil to animate. (I'll still upload it so you have a placeholder :) ).
A proper model would take more than 15 minutes to make. This was more to illustrate that you don't need all that much to make these creatures.
EDIT: It's also rife with non-quads which WILL give triangulation issues. Again, only use as placeholder. Don't even bother trying to texture this monstrosity.
Hmm I didn't intend for it to look like it has any hair 🤔
​
Can you point out the areas where he looks like he needs some trimming so I can be sure to avoid the mistake for next time?
I wanted to give Marv a break he tries so hard and helps so many I don't mind helping him out.
Side note congratulations on helping me learn a new word I had no idea artifice was a word especially not a word meaning Clever or cunning devices or expedients, especially as used to trick or deceive others^([1]) or (the use of) a clever trick or something intended to deceive^([2]). That said the word still seems out of place to me.
​
SCP Reader by VSong on Android. Note that it's that specific one I'm using, but that's not the only app on the Play Store called "SCP Reader". But that's the one I use.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ca.vsong.scpreader&hl=en&gl=US&showAllReviews=true
this should do the trick for you i believe
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ca.vsong.scpreader&hl=en_US&gl=US
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tverona.scpanywhere&hl=en_US&gl=US
I found two from a quick search. Maybe one of these?
SCP containment breach ultimate edition. Easy download easy to run and has the most content out of all the games, if you have a high end PC check out the unity version I can run ultimate edition on normal settings 30-60 FPS but unity on “potato” literal lowest setting will all options like bloom turned off and it barely rinds 30ish fps.
That's not how it works. Public Domain is distinctly different from CC BY-SA 3.0.
As you can see, with CC BY-SA 3.0, any derivative works must be also under CC BY-SA 3.0. Additionally, the original must be credited. This means, for instance, if Disney was to make an SCP-079 film, the film itself must be CC BY-SA 3.0 which allows anyone else to also make derivative works of their film under CC BY-SA 3.0 and so on and so forth. Companies like Disney would hate this. It is a lack of control over their product that would never be acceptable.
There is no such clause with Public Domain. Derivative works can be and have been copyrighted (see the many Disney movies of which you mention) as Public Domain is, quite literally, a lack of any license at all.
There is a reason why Disney has spent the last 50 years fighting tooth and nail to not let Mickey Mouse fall into the Public Domain.
u/DoggoDoesASad is wrong, the SCP wiki isn't in the public domain. It's licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike license, meaning that anyone can use it and share it, as long as a) you credit the authors, and b) you put whatever work you're doing under the same license.
This license gives a lot of freedom to anyone looking to become creative with it, but it also prohibits most classical companies to work with it: While the production company could sell copies of the series or movie, it cannot sell exclusive licenses to TV networks, and without that, the thing cannot work.
Realistically, the only viable financing model of an SCP movie is a kickstarter, or just plain old hobby work. Note that hobby work doesn't necessarily result in bad results, DYNAMO ep6 shows that quite well.
I'm curious if you're aware that virtually all of the SCP wiki, the ideas, logos, etc are all under a Creative Commons BY-SA license. That means any work made from material that uses that license must also have the same license.
There is nothing that would prevent you from charging for the game if you want to charge for it, but because your work would have to be under the same license there is nothing that'd prevent people from downloading the game and then reuploading somewhere else for everyone to download. That'd be perfectly legal.
You also can't use DRM as the license explicitly forbids it.
Not trying to rain on your parade, just want to be sure that you know about these license restrictions. Everyone who builds upon the SCP world should be aware of them. The license is why stuff like a Netflix adaptation will never exist.
By default, I think unlikely, because they wouldn't be able to make money out of it. The SCP articles are created with CC BY-SA 3.0 by default. That means that they would have to release the series with similar or compatible license, meaning, free to share.
However, the CC license does not limit the rights holder from using their work in a different way. IANAL, but it might be possible for them to, as you mention, talk with individual writers, and license their work individually for commercial purposes. The question is, who owns the individual SCPs?
Most of the posts have been edited by dozens of people, over many years. Do they get some credit? If the rights belong to the original creator only, the most famous posts were made years ago, with many writers MIA... Overall, it seems that the hassle of sorting out the legality of it might be more than it's worth, when compared to literally thousands of creators hurling pitches and scripts at Netflix every day of the week.
Overall I think a series like that would have to be community driven and non-profit, or something similar, cause I don't think any major studio will try to dip into this mess.
You absolutely can. Material on SCP wiki is licenses under [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/](CC BY-SA 3.0) except where noted otherwise meaning you are free to share and remove the content in anyway, without restriction as long as attribution is given to the original author.
The best example of what can't be used under this license is the image of 173. If have to check but it's possible that the restriction may pertain only to that exact piece of art and not the likeness of 173 itself.
I made a document with a few transformation things. Don't know if this is allowed, but here: Document. You can put comments on the side if you have something to add.
There are certain geometric properties that are true in a Euclidean plane; the angles of triangles will always sum to 180 degrees, lines that begin parallel will stay parallel and will never diverge, among other things. If you were to take that plane, roll it into a tube, and then roll that tube into a donut (torus) all of those things would still hold true. If you were a 2D creature living inside that torus, you would perceive it as a flat space that somehow wraps back around on itself.
This article contains a neat visualization of this concept. A lot of old-school video game worlds that seemed like flat planes were actually toroids in reality.
The way you said that, sounded like the family friendly horror comic, Erma. It’s similar to the Ring story, but a ghost similar to Sautiko (I think that’s her name), marries a horror writer and they have a half-living kid named Erma. She creepy and cute, horror for the younger audience (although older audiences may enjoy the comic too).
This is the link: https://tapas.io/series/Erma, and I hope you enjoy it.
I run Site-42 on YouTube; I’d happily donate something from the Site-42 Teespring Shop or do a custom recording/video of some sort. Get in touch and let me know.
I use this app on android to download scp articles from the wiki:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ca.vsong.scpreader
You can download whole series (1000 articles) at a time and up to 2 nested pages at the same time. So if one page is containment and it references another page for logs and that references another page, all 3 will get downloaded and can be looked at offline. You can change the downloaded level in settings.
Or just download individual pages and anything they link to (up to 2 links deep).
You can also bookmark pages too. I like it.
"SCP-106" Emergence (licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0)
Edit: I made a focus on photorealism/photography style, as per specification. A thought for your considerations Dr. [REDACTED].
Legally, it is not. Period. There is no ambiguity here. If you are still confused you are more than welcome to pursue this document for clarification: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode
FYI this is basically the first time I've actually tried to make something half decent in PS so it's probably not great and any tips or suggestions for changes are appreciated
Also, idk what SCP that figure would be. I'm sure there's one looking like it but the original photo had a guy with sandals holding a camera so I thought I'd edit him a bit. This was the original
Thanks for letting us know.
Sorry that it's become this whole ordeal. If you'd like to try again, ProtonMail.com has come up as another option that has worked for a few. I know that ProtonMail does absolutely no spam filtering, but I can't say if that makes a difference in this case or if Wikidot's mail servers just fall asleep sometimes.
We've finally established a dialogue with WikiDot engineers today. A fix is coming. No timeframe for it yet.
I don't know if it perfectly fits what you are looking for but I made one for logos and promotional use for the The Foundation video game I'm working on. It consists of a little over half images from the wiki (public domain ones) with some public domain military pics.
You can check it out here: http://www.indiedb.com/games/the-foundation/images/the-foundation-wallpaper
I would highly recommend something like A Dark Room, at least in terms of technology stack, not in terms of it being fundamentally a clicker. I'd recommend a conceit where you are interacting with the facility through a terminal interface and going from there.
The basic reasons I recommend this are A: I am a professional programmer, and this is something you can actually get going in a reasonable period of time even from 0 knowledge. B: It's something you can write incrementally, starting from a fun tech demo, proceeding through to a simple game, and then you can do whatever you like as you go, while always having something in hand. (Part of being a good programmer is learning that trick. You don't want to make plans that involve seventeen distinct threads of development all having to come together perfectly at the end, prior to which you have absolutely nothing. Also, having something functioning quickly and working all along is just more fun.)
(If you have dreams of writing another genre of game, my recommendation is: 1. Take your favorite example of that genre of game. 2. Watch the end credits, and read aloud every name that shows up in it. 3. Write your name on a piece of paper, and read aloud every name that shows up on it. 4. Compare how long steps 2 and 3 took. 5. Plan appropriately. I think there's a great text-based "administrator using a terminal" game that could be made, if people would stop trying to write SCP first-person shooter MMOs with .75 programmers and somebody's dog.)
> like X-com but deeper
Which would suffer the usual problems with being way too ambitious to ever be finished.
I've often thought a really solid possible SCP base-management game that would work, and is in fact something one person could do in their spare time with a reasonable hope of finishing, would be a base management game that is a take-off of A Dark Room. Not the clicker elements of it, but the rest of it; the way things open up to you ("you've been assigned a new base but it's Foundation policy to ensure that the new management is up-to-spec before allocating precious resources to it, so prove yourself in the small before we give you large things", etc.), the way events can happen, the way that the interface is primarily text eliminates all of the "asset pipeline" that is so hard to set up with volunteer workers, etc.
It is also a game layout that would allow for much more creativity in the anomalous effects than having to work out how to do them in a 3D engine. 3D engines can easily do certain effects, but there's some they just can't do in any sensible way.
Plus the structure of the game itself would enable incremental development, and you get something playable relatively quickly.
One of the problems with SCP games, or, indeed, any game inspired by a community like this, is that people bite off more than they can chew. They want to create XCom or the next Doom.
The next time you have that goal in mind, do me a favor. Watch the ending roll of credits for that game on Youtube, and read aloud the name of every person involved, at least for the game itself. (That is, skip marketing and legal if you like.)
Don't cheat. Read every one of them aloud.
Then think about what that means exactly.
Personally, I'd suggest that a Foundation Site Management Simulator built around the ideas of A Dark Room could be quite interesting, and that's well within the reach of a person or two. The way the game progressively unlocks could work really well for, say, bringing up a new Site, and with just a bit of randomization so that a given SCP's containment procedures aren't the same for any two playthroughs, the surprise factor can be maintained.
(In fact, were I going to do this, I wouldn't even try to use real mainlist SCPs, or, if I did, I'd be really cruel and have a chance of changing things up sometimes. Oh, was that Euclid your last couple of playthroughs? Guess who just grew some memetic properties. Etc. I wouldn't make the game about spending some quality time with the SCPs we know and love, I'd make it about managing a Foundation site, because they never know what's going to happen next!)
Just wanted to thank Zhange for the awesome work he put for our game. As there are 25 playable characters and many of them are from the GOIs from Series 1 and 2, they needed to have an original logo as a background. For example, a Horizon Cleric card looks like this.
If you want to see the game's progress, you can check out our web www.efs19.com, where you can find links to our facebook and instagram and subscribe to our newsletter for some extra goodies.
You should use this song in it. It can be powerful, or sad depending on which scenes you play it over
SCP games generally inherit the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license from the source material that they are based on. So at this point there are probably over a hundred SCP games that are libre software.
But I imagine that you are already familiar with how viral licenses like this work, so I might just be misunderstanding your question. SCP Wiki's [[Licensing]] Team might be a better point of contact for this question. A bot will provide link to their info and contact page in reply to my comment.
╭╴ random link : dive for it , mrs whatsit ! ╶╮
Hello! Co-coder of this theme (The other being Croquembouche) here! I'm sure many of you have been wondering what in the hell the fancy new theme on various articles as been.
It's essentially something started by djkaktus (author of many SCPs, particularly the two in the title) and taken up by myself (Woedenaz) and Croquembouche.
It is an attempt at bringing the SCP Layout to more modern design standards as well as increase accessibility via a number of less obvious improvements.
And now it is a UserStyle so you can see it on every page of the site!
In order to install this you will need a Browser Addon, either Stylish or Stylus.
If you notice any bugs or issues, feel free to message me here and I will be happy to address it.
Enjoy!
Looks like a part of the site CSS didn't get loaded. If a refresh doesn't fix this then this is probably because an extension like Privacy Badger is blocking too much.
The first 5 people to respond to this comment with their desktop screen resolution, agent name, and 3 customization requests will get their own personalized wallpaper, courtesy of me (OP). Multiple monitor resolutions are acceptable and customization requests must be with in reason. I will dm you by Wednesday if you were one of the first 5.
If you missed the boat on getting a customization, see the link below for the full-size wallpaper and the .xcf for personal customization. Files will be available for 1 week. If it has been longer than that, just dm me.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you shouldn't get your hopes up for this game. Stories have leaking out about how the studio developing this game is horrifically mismanaged, with the senior management having little experience in game development and a history of ill-conceived arbitrary decisions. I hate to link to r/KotakuInAction, but it's the only place I've been able to find an English translation of the original Russian article that made these allegations.
It's a crying shame if all this is true. This was an unique vision, and I'm always up for GRU Division "P"-style shenanigans.